 | Buses Project‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
This reminds me of an old comedy song called " Yes, We Have No Bananas", where by saying yes, you mean you don't have any. Use of double negatives and cryptic abbreviations for the headings in this table makes it hard to follow. Under this system if you want to indicate that an article has an image you enter N in the field NOIMG, when it would be simpler and more intuitive to enter Y to IMAGE. More explicit headings could then be something like: REFS, NOTABLE, STYLE, INFOBOX, LOGO, IMAGE, etc., and yes, no BANANAS. - Secondarywaltz ( talk) 15:48, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
- Your ideas do seem to have a bit logic in them! If we are going to do any changes it would be good to do them now before the table gets filled up. Adding "no" to "refs" seems a bit more sensible that "yes" to "noref", but MickMackNee may think it's easier the other way around. It's early days at the moment, we have already made one change so "yes" is always the "bad" (used as a general term) thing. Arriva436 talk 16:05, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
- Change it to whatever makes more sense, you don't need my permission here ;) (Just be sure to change the instructions so I know what's what). MickMacNee ( talk) 17:06, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
I have filled in the entry for Wilts & Dorset. I did all the main things required for it but there I an issue with the main text. The list of routes has sort of expanded in to a complete guide. I think that some parts are worth keeping (like say the texts giving details of "more" and "Route ONE", as the are sections. But in some of the route lists, the things like "Two return journeys Mon-Fri" should go. I wanted a second opinion on how much to get rid of/keep. Any other ideas?? Arriva436 talk 21:41, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
|
| Buses Project‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
This reminds me of an old comedy song called " Yes, We Have No Bananas", where by saying yes, you mean you don't have any. Use of double negatives and cryptic abbreviations for the headings in this table makes it hard to follow. Under this system if you want to indicate that an article has an image you enter N in the field NOIMG, when it would be simpler and more intuitive to enter Y to IMAGE. More explicit headings could then be something like: REFS, NOTABLE, STYLE, INFOBOX, LOGO, IMAGE, etc., and yes, no BANANAS. - Secondarywaltz ( talk) 15:48, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
- Your ideas do seem to have a bit logic in them! If we are going to do any changes it would be good to do them now before the table gets filled up. Adding "no" to "refs" seems a bit more sensible that "yes" to "noref", but MickMackNee may think it's easier the other way around. It's early days at the moment, we have already made one change so "yes" is always the "bad" (used as a general term) thing. Arriva436 talk 16:05, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
- Change it to whatever makes more sense, you don't need my permission here ;) (Just be sure to change the instructions so I know what's what). MickMacNee ( talk) 17:06, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
I have filled in the entry for Wilts & Dorset. I did all the main things required for it but there I an issue with the main text. The list of routes has sort of expanded in to a complete guide. I think that some parts are worth keeping (like say the texts giving details of "more" and "Route ONE", as the are sections. But in some of the route lists, the things like "Two return journeys Mon-Fri" should go. I wanted a second opinion on how much to get rid of/keep. Any other ideas?? Arriva436 talk 21:41, 23 September 2008 (UTC)