Essays Low‑impact | ||||||||||
|
Am I correct in my interpretation of this as "Pages that have actually been deleted as G6 but do not qualify"? If so, it'd probably be better to say that. (Maybe not with the "actually".) I'm of two minds about linking to examples of them; while it would be helpful to show that we're not just being randomly alarmist, it would likely be taken poorly by the deleting administrators, and rightly so.
This section name would be better listing broad guidance of the sorts of pages that aren't G6s, rather than these very specific examples. Stuff like "any non-temporary deletion of information" (not just "content", which could be interpreted as excluding most pages outside the main namespace); "any page whose deletion anyone familiar with Wikipedia could object to in good faith, or who has already objected to"; and "any page which nearly fits another speedy deletion criterion but is specifically excluded from it". — Cryptic 21:43, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Essays Low‑impact | ||||||||||
|
Am I correct in my interpretation of this as "Pages that have actually been deleted as G6 but do not qualify"? If so, it'd probably be better to say that. (Maybe not with the "actually".) I'm of two minds about linking to examples of them; while it would be helpful to show that we're not just being randomly alarmist, it would likely be taken poorly by the deleting administrators, and rightly so.
This section name would be better listing broad guidance of the sorts of pages that aren't G6s, rather than these very specific examples. Stuff like "any non-temporary deletion of information" (not just "content", which could be interpreted as excluding most pages outside the main namespace); "any page whose deletion anyone familiar with Wikipedia could object to in good faith, or who has already objected to"; and "any page which nearly fits another speedy deletion criterion but is specifically excluded from it". — Cryptic 21:43, 10 February 2024 (UTC)