![]() | Spoken Wikipedia | |||
|
![]() | Wikipedia:Spoken articles is a reader-facing page intended for viewing by non-editors. Please prioritize their needs when adjusting its design, and move editor-facing elements to the WikiProject page. |
Currently it reads:
But for consistency with existing practice, shouldn't it be the other way around? The
Featured articles page has an image for spoken articles, and bold for appearance on the main page. I think this page should follow the established tradition, or else it can get kind of confusing. —
Timwi 13:07, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
So is there a good reason to have the same information listed "three" times on the page? -- CGP 22:05, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Spoken articles should only be used for disabled individuals such as blind people etc... However I would really, and I mean really reconsider the people who are chosen to record and used to read out the articles, because so far they are all below average, with slurring, mis-reads and weird accents. You can't expect just anyone to do these with their computer mics (resulting in reverb and irritating interference), but I would strongly advise using professionals in audio-visual or audio-engineering instead. Piecraft 00:50, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
Which brings me to this suggestion or request - is there a page that could collect and award the spoken files for their high quality? And when I say high quality, I don't just mean sound quality, but I am talking about the quality of the speaker (so maybe it should collect names of users who are highly regarded for their spoken files). I'll go right ahead and give props to the spoken file for Rachel Green. I think the person who recorded this is a podcaster that has his own site at http://www.techonthefly.com/techonthefly/drupal/, but isn't particularly involved with Wikipedia. The first file he uploaded advertised his "techonthefly" site within the file, so someone ( User:MarkSweep) cut that part out. In any case, the quality of the speech is very good. Kenumay 20:58, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi,
i added the hear it links because im from germany and would like to use this files to learn speaking and hearing english but my downloadmanager can only catch directlinking files and noone who have a site before. For the actually status i must write an extra ripper :| I hope the use of this file is ok for wikipedia?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.146.210.136 ( talk • contribs) .
Who makes these recordings, and how can we request that an article is spoken? - 007bond aka Matthew G aka codingmasters 21:53, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
The new icon for oggs is acquard, fussy, and dreadful. Where is the forum for discussing this. Thanks. Ceoil 19:55, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
There is a discussion underway at Wikipedia talk:Categorization#Hidden categories concerning what kinds of categories should be hidden (using the new HIDDENCAT magic word). For the moment it is proposed that hiding be applied to all categories which classify the article rather than the article subject (i.e. maintenance cats, stub cats, etc. and this category). Please weigh in. -- Kotniski ( talk) 08:55, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
how can i add these spoken articles to podcast of iTunes —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.94.151.182 ( talk) 11:05, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
That's a bit disrespectful to Sports. Or plain overgeneralization. -- AaThinker ( talk) 14:37, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Many of the categories are awkward. Many categories are missing. Am I correct that anyone can edit the categories to make better sense? Alanasings ( talk) 16:17, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
I have been listening to a few of these on my MP3 player and really enjoy them. I wanted to suggest that it would be would a really great idea to start a spoken article podcast. Each week a spoken article can be chosen, one that is well written, and spoken and recorded, or may be just relevant to that weeks events. May be chosen by a vote or something. Then that article could be podcasted out. I don't know all the technical aspects that would be required, or weather it would need to be done some where else other than on Wikipedia. I just think it would be a cool idea and I'd love to help make it happen. -- The_stuart ( talk) 21:55, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
They can be used to jog while listening on an mp3 device. (Referring to a comment above saying this is "only" for the disabled). -- 94.71.106.211 ( talk) 17:13, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi, iv been thinking, cant we put these pages in collasping templates?
it would make it a lot easier to browse the page
and different versions could be added to the articles themselfs
let me know your thoughts
Sghfdhdfghdfgfd ( talk) 15:43, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
Just listen to the example of Portal Prelude voices: http://www.portalprelude.com/2008/09/day-sixteen-about-voices.php Three male voices used in the game sound prefect. http://www.acapela-group.com was used there. GrayFace ( talk)
I think that this project would be useful at Wikiversity. It's sometimes easier to learn when listening to stuff, and it will be a great aid for visually impaired students, as many coursebooks aren't in braille. Thoughts? ManishEarth Talk • Stalk 05:56, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
T2S and all other computer generated articles should either have their own section or their entries should be distinct enough to be able to tell that that's what they are without having to open them. If no objections arise, I shall proceed with making their entries distinct (I'm thinking underlined gray). Temporal Fugitive ( talk) 07:45, 7 May 2010 (UTC) Done. Hope I didn't miss anything! Temporal Fugitive ( talk) 10:18, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
There are many spoken articles that no longer bear even the slightest resemblance to the current text version. I think those articles (eg dinosaur) should be indicated in the list. Serendi pod ous 20:12, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
Please consider providing subcategories according the dialects of the speakers narrating the articles. This request is prompted by a
question in a discussion at
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language. (This talk page is on my watchlist, and I will watch here for a reply or replies.)
—
Wavelength (
talk)
06:38, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
There are spoken articles, which are not listed in this list:
Please, add to appropriate section. -- Andrew Krizhanovsky ( talk) 19:20, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
Done
Derfel73 (
talk)
20:01, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
This section contains too many "Erotic" spoken articles. I propose to make a separate subsection titled "Sexuality". -- Andrew Krizhanovsky ( talk) 08:58, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
The audio File:Acharya Jagadish Chandra Bose College.ogg is very similar to the computer generated audio. If it is true, then it should be Grayed out.
English native speakers, please, check it. -- Andrew Krizhanovsky ( talk) 06:59, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
I learn Japanese and me very need that page. But I cannot find it. Haven't Japanese people recorded audio articles? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.8.152.168 ( talk) 19:39, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
I have added a recording for [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion, but it doesn't show up as it should, can somebody fix this for me -- The ChampionMan 1234 04:58, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
If somebody want to create spoken version of article, which have some words/phrases in Russian, then I can record these Russian words for you and upload to Commons. Because Russian is my native language. I hope that the result spoken article (with mix of native Russian and native English) will be more high quality spoken article. :) -- Andrew Krizhanovsky ( talk) 12:28, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
All the podcasts I listen to include music and some have sound effects. - These can serve nicely as an audio equivalent of chapter markings and block text. However I haven't heard any spoken articles using these, and the result comes out rather dry. Is there a policy? Also, if an article about a TV show included background music from the show in question, (under me reading the article) would that pass as fair use? Algr ( talk) 22:02, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
I'm wondering if there is a way to gain bulk access to (meta)data on the spoken wikipedia files, e.g. file length, user, accent? Which script or workflow would allow you to export this data into an easy table format? Anyone know of an easy fix, or willing to help make it happen?
Incidentally, are the data on files added only by the author, or also by later reviewers?
Pusle8 ( talk) 10:40, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
The torrent link on the page referred to seems broken. Is there an updated version? Pusle8 ( talk) 10:40, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
Is this page automatically updated via some categories (couldn't find local markings) or is this curated, and updated as the moderators manage too keep up? Pusle8 ( talk) 10:43, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
Bhutanese Passport lol, seriously? TomemPL ( talk) 16:11, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
I would like to record articles in my free-time, but I don't have very much of it. If I had an easy way to find short articles, are any strategies to optimize recording, it would be extremely helpful. Thanks in advance for any ideas! Tanzensally ( talk) 09:06, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
I'm finding it hard to credit that a recent bulk request is really genuine, especially as all are just tagged "important", no more explanation.
Donald Trump stuff? Sure.
Some of these though? [1] [2] Special:Contributions/Lionsdude148
@ Lionsdude148: - can you please explain why so many, and all "important" ? Andy Dingley ( talk) 02:25, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Many articles use this template when the first word of the article title is "The" which leads, unfortunately, to an unnecessary repeat of "the". Can someone please fix this or at least tell me why you can't Jodosma (talk) 20:42, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
There appear to be articles that were recorded as spoken articles many years ago where the pages have likely changed significantly since and need re-recording. Is there any way to highlight this? If not I think it would be handy if we could implement a way to highlight outdated spoken articles (perhaps a new template?). For example the spoken article for the Avril Lavigne page has not been updated in over 9 years. Helper201 ( talk) 22:07, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
This is not even a project page per se. I have removed the text "If you have more questions, please ask the project coordinator, {{u|Galendalia}} on their [[User talk:Galendalia|talk page]]."
from the prominent box at the top of the page, because of concerns about
ownership of content and Wikipedia's
third pillar. There has been some discussion about this at
User talk:Galendalia, and I would be surprised if there is consensus for adding this text, after all what has been discussed. If anyone else than the "project coordinator" agrees to include the text, I'd be surprised.
~ ToBeFree (
talk)
11:08, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
I edited one of the list guidelines, encouraging people to include the year of their recordings to this page when they add them, and I programmatically added the year to the majority of the recordings already here. (Specifically, I added all the ones which had a date format that I could easily get my code to recognise). With a little more work I could finish the job, coding to recognise some more formats, then doing any remaining troublemakers manually. However, before pressing on too far, I want to make sure people are on board with this!
There have been a few requests over the years from people wanting to identify which recordings are out-of-date, and I think this could help with that. Have a look yourself at the ones that are up to see if it seems helpful. I'm feeling a bit cautious because the page I edited is aimed at readers, whereas this change is definitely motivated by editing; however, the information could be useful to readers too, who may want to know when a recording's from.
I first tried adding the whole date, but that made the page look too cluttered, and so I think including only the year is a good compromise. (Even if it's a bit harsh on articles uploaded in December!)
Looking ahead: it could be even more useful to get more accurate measures of how much an article has changed – e.g. detecting how much the actual text of the article has changed since the recording, or whether the article has become good/featured quality since the recording was made – but that would take time and (probably) a bot, and just the date may be enough for now. (Such changes would need a seperate page, too, since all the info would clutter this one up a bit, and it'd be harder to justify the value to non-editors.)
Thrownfootfalls ( talk) 18:57, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
I think the page could do with a restructure, to make it easier to navigate for listeners, and to make it easier for editors to know where to put their recordings. I have a draft for one almost ready to go on my sandbox (feel free to have a look here), but since it's a substantial change, I thought I should flag it up early instead of surprising everyone.
This started off as I was trying to shift around a few of the recordings for more consistent organisation. Then, seeing how pages like Wikipedia:Contents and Wikipedia:Vital_articles are organised, I started using them as guidance, and, well, one thing led to another. (This is what happens when you're keen to work on recordings, but your neighbours are doing DIY all day...)
I could understand that people might be attached to this layout, and as a relative newcomer I might not be aware of its advantages. Nevertheless, I reckon it's a good move to change it now, since it brings the structure more in line with other such overviews within the encyclopedia, and when the list on this page grows further, many of those other pages will provide a useful example for how to manage that structure. Lastly, I personally find the proposed structure easier to navigate, though I'm definitely happy to be disagreed with on that point! At the very least, I think having a separate "People" section is a very useful and unambiguous category.
Thrownfootfalls ( talk) 21:49, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Helllo, I completed my first recording which is found in the music section. However I seemed to mess up the upload part because it has a page on here but a duplicate on Commons. I looked at the instructions on WP:CMF but this seems to be from an older version, made me more confused. The recording itself is okay. I know for the future I will just use Commons...
Is there a way u can delete the other version? Thanks Grey.vs.gray ( talk) 00:11, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
Is there an place in this project (or another project) for people like me who have been recording the poems that are in some articles? ~~~ Back ache ( talk) 11:46, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
Welcome to use the following collection of music files with free licenses (Creative Commons BY, CC BY-SA, and similar licenses):
The categories are very disorganized. Shouldn't there be a category for Science? Not all Science is Biology or Physics. Alanasings ( talk) 20:45, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Could spoken versions of articles be created for Simple English Wikipedia and/or other languages? I am interested in creating spoken audio files over there. It seems like spoken articles would be particularly useful there. Thoughts, anyone? Alanasings ( talk) 20:14, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Abiogenesis is listed here, but the article does not seem to have the audio files attached to it? Should it be removed from the list of Spoken articles? Alanasings ( talk) 20:43, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
![]() | Spoken Wikipedia | |||
|
![]() | Wikipedia:Spoken articles is a reader-facing page intended for viewing by non-editors. Please prioritize their needs when adjusting its design, and move editor-facing elements to the WikiProject page. |
Currently it reads:
But for consistency with existing practice, shouldn't it be the other way around? The
Featured articles page has an image for spoken articles, and bold for appearance on the main page. I think this page should follow the established tradition, or else it can get kind of confusing. —
Timwi 13:07, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
So is there a good reason to have the same information listed "three" times on the page? -- CGP 22:05, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Spoken articles should only be used for disabled individuals such as blind people etc... However I would really, and I mean really reconsider the people who are chosen to record and used to read out the articles, because so far they are all below average, with slurring, mis-reads and weird accents. You can't expect just anyone to do these with their computer mics (resulting in reverb and irritating interference), but I would strongly advise using professionals in audio-visual or audio-engineering instead. Piecraft 00:50, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
Which brings me to this suggestion or request - is there a page that could collect and award the spoken files for their high quality? And when I say high quality, I don't just mean sound quality, but I am talking about the quality of the speaker (so maybe it should collect names of users who are highly regarded for their spoken files). I'll go right ahead and give props to the spoken file for Rachel Green. I think the person who recorded this is a podcaster that has his own site at http://www.techonthefly.com/techonthefly/drupal/, but isn't particularly involved with Wikipedia. The first file he uploaded advertised his "techonthefly" site within the file, so someone ( User:MarkSweep) cut that part out. In any case, the quality of the speech is very good. Kenumay 20:58, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi,
i added the hear it links because im from germany and would like to use this files to learn speaking and hearing english but my downloadmanager can only catch directlinking files and noone who have a site before. For the actually status i must write an extra ripper :| I hope the use of this file is ok for wikipedia?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.146.210.136 ( talk • contribs) .
Who makes these recordings, and how can we request that an article is spoken? - 007bond aka Matthew G aka codingmasters 21:53, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
The new icon for oggs is acquard, fussy, and dreadful. Where is the forum for discussing this. Thanks. Ceoil 19:55, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
There is a discussion underway at Wikipedia talk:Categorization#Hidden categories concerning what kinds of categories should be hidden (using the new HIDDENCAT magic word). For the moment it is proposed that hiding be applied to all categories which classify the article rather than the article subject (i.e. maintenance cats, stub cats, etc. and this category). Please weigh in. -- Kotniski ( talk) 08:55, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
how can i add these spoken articles to podcast of iTunes —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.94.151.182 ( talk) 11:05, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
That's a bit disrespectful to Sports. Or plain overgeneralization. -- AaThinker ( talk) 14:37, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Many of the categories are awkward. Many categories are missing. Am I correct that anyone can edit the categories to make better sense? Alanasings ( talk) 16:17, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
I have been listening to a few of these on my MP3 player and really enjoy them. I wanted to suggest that it would be would a really great idea to start a spoken article podcast. Each week a spoken article can be chosen, one that is well written, and spoken and recorded, or may be just relevant to that weeks events. May be chosen by a vote or something. Then that article could be podcasted out. I don't know all the technical aspects that would be required, or weather it would need to be done some where else other than on Wikipedia. I just think it would be a cool idea and I'd love to help make it happen. -- The_stuart ( talk) 21:55, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
They can be used to jog while listening on an mp3 device. (Referring to a comment above saying this is "only" for the disabled). -- 94.71.106.211 ( talk) 17:13, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi, iv been thinking, cant we put these pages in collasping templates?
it would make it a lot easier to browse the page
and different versions could be added to the articles themselfs
let me know your thoughts
Sghfdhdfghdfgfd ( talk) 15:43, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
Just listen to the example of Portal Prelude voices: http://www.portalprelude.com/2008/09/day-sixteen-about-voices.php Three male voices used in the game sound prefect. http://www.acapela-group.com was used there. GrayFace ( talk)
I think that this project would be useful at Wikiversity. It's sometimes easier to learn when listening to stuff, and it will be a great aid for visually impaired students, as many coursebooks aren't in braille. Thoughts? ManishEarth Talk • Stalk 05:56, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
T2S and all other computer generated articles should either have their own section or their entries should be distinct enough to be able to tell that that's what they are without having to open them. If no objections arise, I shall proceed with making their entries distinct (I'm thinking underlined gray). Temporal Fugitive ( talk) 07:45, 7 May 2010 (UTC) Done. Hope I didn't miss anything! Temporal Fugitive ( talk) 10:18, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
There are many spoken articles that no longer bear even the slightest resemblance to the current text version. I think those articles (eg dinosaur) should be indicated in the list. Serendi pod ous 20:12, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
Please consider providing subcategories according the dialects of the speakers narrating the articles. This request is prompted by a
question in a discussion at
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language. (This talk page is on my watchlist, and I will watch here for a reply or replies.)
—
Wavelength (
talk)
06:38, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
There are spoken articles, which are not listed in this list:
Please, add to appropriate section. -- Andrew Krizhanovsky ( talk) 19:20, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
Done
Derfel73 (
talk)
20:01, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
This section contains too many "Erotic" spoken articles. I propose to make a separate subsection titled "Sexuality". -- Andrew Krizhanovsky ( talk) 08:58, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
The audio File:Acharya Jagadish Chandra Bose College.ogg is very similar to the computer generated audio. If it is true, then it should be Grayed out.
English native speakers, please, check it. -- Andrew Krizhanovsky ( talk) 06:59, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
I learn Japanese and me very need that page. But I cannot find it. Haven't Japanese people recorded audio articles? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.8.152.168 ( talk) 19:39, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
I have added a recording for [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion, but it doesn't show up as it should, can somebody fix this for me -- The ChampionMan 1234 04:58, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
If somebody want to create spoken version of article, which have some words/phrases in Russian, then I can record these Russian words for you and upload to Commons. Because Russian is my native language. I hope that the result spoken article (with mix of native Russian and native English) will be more high quality spoken article. :) -- Andrew Krizhanovsky ( talk) 12:28, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
All the podcasts I listen to include music and some have sound effects. - These can serve nicely as an audio equivalent of chapter markings and block text. However I haven't heard any spoken articles using these, and the result comes out rather dry. Is there a policy? Also, if an article about a TV show included background music from the show in question, (under me reading the article) would that pass as fair use? Algr ( talk) 22:02, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
I'm wondering if there is a way to gain bulk access to (meta)data on the spoken wikipedia files, e.g. file length, user, accent? Which script or workflow would allow you to export this data into an easy table format? Anyone know of an easy fix, or willing to help make it happen?
Incidentally, are the data on files added only by the author, or also by later reviewers?
Pusle8 ( talk) 10:40, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
The torrent link on the page referred to seems broken. Is there an updated version? Pusle8 ( talk) 10:40, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
Is this page automatically updated via some categories (couldn't find local markings) or is this curated, and updated as the moderators manage too keep up? Pusle8 ( talk) 10:43, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
Bhutanese Passport lol, seriously? TomemPL ( talk) 16:11, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
I would like to record articles in my free-time, but I don't have very much of it. If I had an easy way to find short articles, are any strategies to optimize recording, it would be extremely helpful. Thanks in advance for any ideas! Tanzensally ( talk) 09:06, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
I'm finding it hard to credit that a recent bulk request is really genuine, especially as all are just tagged "important", no more explanation.
Donald Trump stuff? Sure.
Some of these though? [1] [2] Special:Contributions/Lionsdude148
@ Lionsdude148: - can you please explain why so many, and all "important" ? Andy Dingley ( talk) 02:25, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Many articles use this template when the first word of the article title is "The" which leads, unfortunately, to an unnecessary repeat of "the". Can someone please fix this or at least tell me why you can't Jodosma (talk) 20:42, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
There appear to be articles that were recorded as spoken articles many years ago where the pages have likely changed significantly since and need re-recording. Is there any way to highlight this? If not I think it would be handy if we could implement a way to highlight outdated spoken articles (perhaps a new template?). For example the spoken article for the Avril Lavigne page has not been updated in over 9 years. Helper201 ( talk) 22:07, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
This is not even a project page per se. I have removed the text "If you have more questions, please ask the project coordinator, {{u|Galendalia}} on their [[User talk:Galendalia|talk page]]."
from the prominent box at the top of the page, because of concerns about
ownership of content and Wikipedia's
third pillar. There has been some discussion about this at
User talk:Galendalia, and I would be surprised if there is consensus for adding this text, after all what has been discussed. If anyone else than the "project coordinator" agrees to include the text, I'd be surprised.
~ ToBeFree (
talk)
11:08, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
I edited one of the list guidelines, encouraging people to include the year of their recordings to this page when they add them, and I programmatically added the year to the majority of the recordings already here. (Specifically, I added all the ones which had a date format that I could easily get my code to recognise). With a little more work I could finish the job, coding to recognise some more formats, then doing any remaining troublemakers manually. However, before pressing on too far, I want to make sure people are on board with this!
There have been a few requests over the years from people wanting to identify which recordings are out-of-date, and I think this could help with that. Have a look yourself at the ones that are up to see if it seems helpful. I'm feeling a bit cautious because the page I edited is aimed at readers, whereas this change is definitely motivated by editing; however, the information could be useful to readers too, who may want to know when a recording's from.
I first tried adding the whole date, but that made the page look too cluttered, and so I think including only the year is a good compromise. (Even if it's a bit harsh on articles uploaded in December!)
Looking ahead: it could be even more useful to get more accurate measures of how much an article has changed – e.g. detecting how much the actual text of the article has changed since the recording, or whether the article has become good/featured quality since the recording was made – but that would take time and (probably) a bot, and just the date may be enough for now. (Such changes would need a seperate page, too, since all the info would clutter this one up a bit, and it'd be harder to justify the value to non-editors.)
Thrownfootfalls ( talk) 18:57, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
I think the page could do with a restructure, to make it easier to navigate for listeners, and to make it easier for editors to know where to put their recordings. I have a draft for one almost ready to go on my sandbox (feel free to have a look here), but since it's a substantial change, I thought I should flag it up early instead of surprising everyone.
This started off as I was trying to shift around a few of the recordings for more consistent organisation. Then, seeing how pages like Wikipedia:Contents and Wikipedia:Vital_articles are organised, I started using them as guidance, and, well, one thing led to another. (This is what happens when you're keen to work on recordings, but your neighbours are doing DIY all day...)
I could understand that people might be attached to this layout, and as a relative newcomer I might not be aware of its advantages. Nevertheless, I reckon it's a good move to change it now, since it brings the structure more in line with other such overviews within the encyclopedia, and when the list on this page grows further, many of those other pages will provide a useful example for how to manage that structure. Lastly, I personally find the proposed structure easier to navigate, though I'm definitely happy to be disagreed with on that point! At the very least, I think having a separate "People" section is a very useful and unambiguous category.
Thrownfootfalls ( talk) 21:49, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Helllo, I completed my first recording which is found in the music section. However I seemed to mess up the upload part because it has a page on here but a duplicate on Commons. I looked at the instructions on WP:CMF but this seems to be from an older version, made me more confused. The recording itself is okay. I know for the future I will just use Commons...
Is there a way u can delete the other version? Thanks Grey.vs.gray ( talk) 00:11, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
Is there an place in this project (or another project) for people like me who have been recording the poems that are in some articles? ~~~ Back ache ( talk) 11:46, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
Welcome to use the following collection of music files with free licenses (Creative Commons BY, CC BY-SA, and similar licenses):
The categories are very disorganized. Shouldn't there be a category for Science? Not all Science is Biology or Physics. Alanasings ( talk) 20:45, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Could spoken versions of articles be created for Simple English Wikipedia and/or other languages? I am interested in creating spoken audio files over there. It seems like spoken articles would be particularly useful there. Thoughts, anyone? Alanasings ( talk) 20:14, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Abiogenesis is listed here, but the article does not seem to have the audio files attached to it? Should it be removed from the list of Spoken articles? Alanasings ( talk) 20:43, 11 September 2023 (UTC)