Okay, so I already enabled wikibreak enforcer on user:Agradman to prevent myself from editing wikipedia during the school year, but I am still editing wikipedia obsessivel. So I am just going to have to enable it for user:JD Caselaw as well (but not at User:AConcernedChicken -- I gotta have some outlet!)

I'll be checking this page periodically (no, let's be honest -- obsessively). But if you are awaiting my response and a long interval lapses, please send me an email before you take any action. Thanks.

I'm turning on wikibreak enforcer now.

JD Caselaw ( talk) 4:45 am, 3 September 2010, last Friday (2 days ago) (UTC−5)

I'd like to thank everyone for being fair and understanding. This was a much better outcome than my worst fears. In the scheme of things, I win because I'm still working with the people I respect.

I just have a question about the outcome. I don't understand why it is desirable that I formally identify JD_Caselaw with Agradman. During the course of the discussion, nobody ever disputed my contention that, for the last fifteen months, JD_Caselaw has been a legitimate alternative account for making edits which I did not want associated with my real-life name. If I have to identify the two accounts, that undermines the entire concept of the "legitimate alternative account."

Before I identify the two accounts, I would sooner retire JD_Caselaw. But my point is, why do you want me to do either?

- user:Agradman editing as 160.39.222.244 ( talk) 07:38, 4 September 2010 (UTC) reply