 |
Essays Low‑impact  | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Per WP:ESSAYS, this should probably be placed in the userspace of the creator, ScienceApologist ( talk · contribs) until/unless it proves to be something that reflects a broader consensus of Wikipedians. SA, would you be amenable to such a move? -- El on ka 22:22, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- I think with some additional input it would make a reasonable projectspace essay. — Locke Cole • t • c 00:25, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
"...we're saving you from yourself." @ harej 22:32, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Armbrust The Homunculus 10:58, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Sanctions against editors are not punitive → Wikipedia:Sanctions against editors should not be punitive – Guideline is more helpful than a description, especially when the latter is inaccurate. Hyacinth ( talk) 04:24, 1 May 2014 (UTC) Hyacinth ( talk) 04:24, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
- I've fixed the request, assuming you don't want to move the essay to WT space. -- BDD ( talk) 16:31, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support: The fact that the current title isn't true is the entire reason the essay exists! — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 10:12, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
- I think this is a good idea. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 14:25, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
I believe that this essay has earned enough support from the community that it should be upgraded to a guideline.-- Mr. Guye ( talk) 22:03, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
- Support, if the interest is building an encyclopedia then this should be paramount over punitive measures that have no inherent benefit for the mission of collecting free knowledge. -- Donald Trung ( Talk 💬) ( Sockpuppets 🎭) ( Articles 📚) 20:10, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
What about sanctions against admins? QuackGuru ( talk) 19:42, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
- @ QuackGuru: All admins are editors. No one has passed WP:RFA without making a single edit. ((( The Quixotic Potato))) ( talk) 20:05, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
|
|
Essays Low‑impact | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Per WP:ESSAYS, this should probably be placed in the userspace of the creator, ScienceApologist ( talk · contribs) until/unless it proves to be something that reflects a broader consensus of Wikipedians. SA, would you be amenable to such a move? -- El on ka 22:22, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- I think with some additional input it would make a reasonable projectspace essay. — Locke Cole • t • c 00:25, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
"...we're saving you from yourself." @ harej 22:32, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Armbrust The Homunculus 10:58, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Sanctions against editors are not punitive → Wikipedia:Sanctions against editors should not be punitive – Guideline is more helpful than a description, especially when the latter is inaccurate. Hyacinth ( talk) 04:24, 1 May 2014 (UTC) Hyacinth ( talk) 04:24, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
- I've fixed the request, assuming you don't want to move the essay to WT space. -- BDD ( talk) 16:31, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support: The fact that the current title isn't true is the entire reason the essay exists! — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 10:12, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
- I think this is a good idea. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 14:25, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
I believe that this essay has earned enough support from the community that it should be upgraded to a guideline.-- Mr. Guye ( talk) 22:03, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
- Support, if the interest is building an encyclopedia then this should be paramount over punitive measures that have no inherent benefit for the mission of collecting free knowledge. -- Donald Trung ( Talk 💬) ( Sockpuppets 🎭) ( Articles 📚) 20:10, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
What about sanctions against admins? QuackGuru ( talk) 19:42, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
- @ QuackGuru: All admins are editors. No one has passed WP:RFA without making a single edit. ((( The Quixotic Potato))) ( talk) 20:05, 16 August 2017 (UTC)