Clerk note: The following users could not be notified due to page protection or bot exclusion:
Please notify them manually, or take other appropriate action. MediationBot ( talk) 16:39, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
I think the logical next step in this dispute is to ask for an uninvolved admin to close the RFC, not to begin another process here.-- Taylornate ( talk) 16:52, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
Furthermore, there are several editors who explicitly stated their support of my position and you have listed none of them here. Why?-- Taylornate ( talk) 16:59, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
I agree that a mediator would be useful here since it seems to have devolved into a revert-war.
— User:Y12J
Really, you you write this as you begin a fresh round, ending one week without reverts?-- Taylornate ( talk) 00:27, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
Clerk note: The following users could not be notified due to page protection or bot exclusion:
Please notify them manually, or take other appropriate action. MediationBot ( talk) 20:29, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Finley just sent out the notice that the request is rejected due to Taylor's disagreeing to it. Might've saved some time to ask him beforehand. This page is apparently going to get deleted after "a reasonable amount of time" according to the template, so I would like to propose we archive it (as well as this talk page) on the extensor page's talk. Any agreement or objections? Y12J ( talk) 22:05, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
I can see no objection. If Doctor No objects, let him sue. JonRichfield ( talk) 13:46, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Clerk note: The following users could not be notified due to page protection or bot exclusion:
Please notify them manually, or take other appropriate action. MediationBot ( talk) 16:39, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
I think the logical next step in this dispute is to ask for an uninvolved admin to close the RFC, not to begin another process here.-- Taylornate ( talk) 16:52, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
Furthermore, there are several editors who explicitly stated their support of my position and you have listed none of them here. Why?-- Taylornate ( talk) 16:59, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
I agree that a mediator would be useful here since it seems to have devolved into a revert-war.
— User:Y12J
Really, you you write this as you begin a fresh round, ending one week without reverts?-- Taylornate ( talk) 00:27, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
Clerk note: The following users could not be notified due to page protection or bot exclusion:
Please notify them manually, or take other appropriate action. MediationBot ( talk) 20:29, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Finley just sent out the notice that the request is rejected due to Taylor's disagreeing to it. Might've saved some time to ask him beforehand. This page is apparently going to get deleted after "a reasonable amount of time" according to the template, so I would like to propose we archive it (as well as this talk page) on the extensor page's talk. Any agreement or objections? Y12J ( talk) 22:05, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
I can see no objection. If Doctor No objects, let him sue. JonRichfield ( talk) 13:46, 17 April 2012 (UTC)