I am a bit worried here as Ryulong simply does not seem to get it. Blocks like this are the exact thing this RFC is discussing. A first time block of one week, on a IP editor whom is editing the same subjects as Ryulong is exactly what this RFC is about. Also, I am still noticing that Ryulong is continuing to revert non-vandalism edits such as:
Mind you all of these reverts and the block were performed after this RFC was filed. If it is clear enough that Ryulong is not going to take these concerns to heart and work on improving his behavior there is no point to it being open and I might as well just file a RFAR. Tiptoety talk 20:06, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Let me begin by assuming you missed Ottava Rima's call for your head, and decided to go straight for me. What you fail to grasp Ryulong, is that I have absolutely no remorse for an admin who is unwilling to take suggestions and corrective actions upon the communities various objections, outlined in both of these RfC's. But that was before your second response. You only now say you will try to appease us, and change, but only with a possible arbitration case in the air (yet likely to retire over?). Regardless. You were the party who assumed this RfC might be used for a case, and if my view is endorsed with enough signatures, I will have no problem filing the case myself. But as you should know, this might not happen given that it is not the most popular view at the moment. If this is the case, then so be it. I hold no grudge with you. Syn ergy 20:39, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
I noticed that Mythdon stated that Ryulong said he would wheel war. After reading over the diff, the comment Ryulong made here did bring up a few concerns, but did not see like a statement of his intentions to wheel war. I think Ryulong should have an opportunity to clarify what he meant by that statement and encourage him t do so. Tiptoety talk 22:20, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Okay, I have just looked through a talk page post made by Ryulong, and now I find that he threatened to block an editor, only because that editor was changing header colors on an article episode list. Disturbing, isn't it?. — Mythdon ( talk • contribs) 19:48, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
While Ryulong generally abuses rollback, I have recently found him to have made a somewhat more WP:ROLLBACK-compliant rollback for a change. This was a rollback of false information—potential vandalism. However, the issue is that Ryulong did not warn the offending editor of their offense that was rolled back. I am not defending Ryulong, but rather pointing out that he may be cleaning up his act. — Mythdon ( talk • contribs) 23:27, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
I am a bit worried here as Ryulong simply does not seem to get it. Blocks like this are the exact thing this RFC is discussing. A first time block of one week, on a IP editor whom is editing the same subjects as Ryulong is exactly what this RFC is about. Also, I am still noticing that Ryulong is continuing to revert non-vandalism edits such as:
Mind you all of these reverts and the block were performed after this RFC was filed. If it is clear enough that Ryulong is not going to take these concerns to heart and work on improving his behavior there is no point to it being open and I might as well just file a RFAR. Tiptoety talk 20:06, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Let me begin by assuming you missed Ottava Rima's call for your head, and decided to go straight for me. What you fail to grasp Ryulong, is that I have absolutely no remorse for an admin who is unwilling to take suggestions and corrective actions upon the communities various objections, outlined in both of these RfC's. But that was before your second response. You only now say you will try to appease us, and change, but only with a possible arbitration case in the air (yet likely to retire over?). Regardless. You were the party who assumed this RfC might be used for a case, and if my view is endorsed with enough signatures, I will have no problem filing the case myself. But as you should know, this might not happen given that it is not the most popular view at the moment. If this is the case, then so be it. I hold no grudge with you. Syn ergy 20:39, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
I noticed that Mythdon stated that Ryulong said he would wheel war. After reading over the diff, the comment Ryulong made here did bring up a few concerns, but did not see like a statement of his intentions to wheel war. I think Ryulong should have an opportunity to clarify what he meant by that statement and encourage him t do so. Tiptoety talk 22:20, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Okay, I have just looked through a talk page post made by Ryulong, and now I find that he threatened to block an editor, only because that editor was changing header colors on an article episode list. Disturbing, isn't it?. — Mythdon ( talk • contribs) 19:48, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
While Ryulong generally abuses rollback, I have recently found him to have made a somewhat more WP:ROLLBACK-compliant rollback for a change. This was a rollback of false information—potential vandalism. However, the issue is that Ryulong did not warn the offending editor of their offense that was rolled back. I am not defending Ryulong, but rather pointing out that he may be cleaning up his act. — Mythdon ( talk • contribs) 23:27, 11 March 2009 (UTC)