This is ridiculous. Ronz added so many complaints against my edits that you would think I am the devil itself. Wow. I have added some more to show how unrelated complaints will appear as if it matters. Frankly, this website is a waste of time! Also, It is abuse to use this medium to harass another user and TROCHOS and DOUG are actively doing. Marburg72 ( talk) 02:42, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Further evidence of Sock Puppetry is seen on Paul B's talk page, when Trochos asked him to sign the page in support of his claims: Marburg72 I have just filed an RfC about user Marburg72, whose edit you recently reverted. If you would like to add any comments, under the headings "Other users who endorse this summary", or "Outside view" or in the "Users who endorse this summary:" at the end of Marburg72's "Response" section, please do so Pauls request for endorsement of the RFC is in direct violation of Wikipedia policy listed as "Sock Puppetry" or possibly Meat Puppetry". As stated here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sock_puppetry Do not recruit meatpuppets. It is considered highly inappropriate to advertise Wikipedia articles to your friends, family members, or communities of people who agree with you, so that they come to Wikipedia and support your side of a debate. If you feel that a debate is ignoring your voice, then the appropriate action is to avoid personal attacks, seek comments and involvement from other Wikipedians, or pursue dispute resolution. These are well-tested processes, designed to avoid the problem of exchanging bias in one direction for bias in another. Wikipedia has policies and processes to mitigate the disruption caused by meatpuppetry:
1. Consensus in many debates and discussions is not based upon number of votes, but upon policy-related points made by editors. Newcomers are unlikely to understand Wikipedia policies and practices , or to introduce any evidence that other users have not already mentioned . 2. In votes or vote-like discussions, new users tend to be disregarded or given significantly less weight, especially if there are many of them expressing the same opinion. 3. For the purposes of dispute resolution, the Arbitration Committee has ruled that when there is uncertainty whether a party is one user with sock puppets, or several users acting as meatpuppets, they may be treated as one entity.
Marburg72 ( talk) 01:23, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
Marburg72 ( talk) 03:04, 4 July 2008 (UTC) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/David_Trochos Marburg72 ( talk) 03:45, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
This is ridiculous. Ronz added so many complaints against my edits that you would think I am the devil itself. Wow. I have added some more to show how unrelated complaints will appear as if it matters. Frankly, this website is a waste of time! Also, It is abuse to use this medium to harass another user and TROCHOS and DOUG are actively doing. Marburg72 ( talk) 02:42, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Further evidence of Sock Puppetry is seen on Paul B's talk page, when Trochos asked him to sign the page in support of his claims: Marburg72 I have just filed an RfC about user Marburg72, whose edit you recently reverted. If you would like to add any comments, under the headings "Other users who endorse this summary", or "Outside view" or in the "Users who endorse this summary:" at the end of Marburg72's "Response" section, please do so Pauls request for endorsement of the RFC is in direct violation of Wikipedia policy listed as "Sock Puppetry" or possibly Meat Puppetry". As stated here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sock_puppetry Do not recruit meatpuppets. It is considered highly inappropriate to advertise Wikipedia articles to your friends, family members, or communities of people who agree with you, so that they come to Wikipedia and support your side of a debate. If you feel that a debate is ignoring your voice, then the appropriate action is to avoid personal attacks, seek comments and involvement from other Wikipedians, or pursue dispute resolution. These are well-tested processes, designed to avoid the problem of exchanging bias in one direction for bias in another. Wikipedia has policies and processes to mitigate the disruption caused by meatpuppetry:
1. Consensus in many debates and discussions is not based upon number of votes, but upon policy-related points made by editors. Newcomers are unlikely to understand Wikipedia policies and practices , or to introduce any evidence that other users have not already mentioned . 2. In votes or vote-like discussions, new users tend to be disregarded or given significantly less weight, especially if there are many of them expressing the same opinion. 3. For the purposes of dispute resolution, the Arbitration Committee has ruled that when there is uncertainty whether a party is one user with sock puppets, or several users acting as meatpuppets, they may be treated as one entity.
Marburg72 ( talk) 01:23, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
Marburg72 ( talk) 03:04, 4 July 2008 (UTC) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/David_Trochos Marburg72 ( talk) 03:45, 4 July 2008 (UTC)