Active:
Inactive/away:
To update this listing, edit this template and scroll down until you find the right list of arbitrators.
Please may I suggest a minor word change for the remedy that states Alkiver is desysopped. I'm of personal belief that the words "stripped of his administrative privileges" is possibly a little heavy handed. How about something a little more neutral like "is to have his administrator privileges revoked". Just something for you to consider. Ryan Postlethwaite 15:25, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Done. FloNight ♥♥♥ 22:51, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
I'm not sure what wording would be appropriate so I won't suggest anything specific on the workshop, but I had a comment. 7 of the 14 links on the FoF about Alkivar's adminship link to logs; maybe a note about proper log entries should be included in the principles, either as a separate principle or under " Communication". Milto LOL pia 01:49, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
A new essay I started yesterday, intended in general terms but specifically inspired by the multiple leniency experiments that have been proposed in this case. Basically, you can't squeeze blood from a turnip. Extreme gestures of good faith and leniency aren't necessary when an editor shows no hint of remorse. Durova Charge! 17:41, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Kirill and Flo, don't you think a finding (and remedy, depending on the finding) should be part of the decision? See the workshop, he's certainly part of the dispute too. A finding one way or another regarding his status would be appreciated. Picaroon (t) 00:59, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
The subsection title Burntsauce is sock of a banned user should probably have "sock" replaced with the word "puppet", since the text reads that he may be a meatpuppet or a sockpuppet. This isn't important by any stretch, but it seems like something that should be done anyways. Cheers, The Hybrid T/ C 04:44, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Under the "Decorum" statement shouldn't the move to de-sysop and block Eyrian for incivility and sockpuppetry during the trivia edit war be added as a possible decision? –– Lid( Talk) 12:59, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Flonight's comment in her oppose for Proposed remedy 1.1 suggests that there is private evidence supporting the decisions here. If this is indeed the case, could the final decision make it clear? This seems important, particularly if the Committee is indeed taking the unusual step of barring an RfA. Chick Bowen 03:07, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
I am not sure where best to post this, but it seems like it will be seen here. I just wanted to encourage the arbiters to close this case now (as they seem inclined to do) and take up the related Eyrian matter as a separate case. It is better to move forward with these remedies now; they have the clear support of the committee and can enter into force while sanctions (if necessary) on others ar considered. Eluchil404 08:05, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Active:
Inactive/away:
To update this listing, edit this template and scroll down until you find the right list of arbitrators.
Please may I suggest a minor word change for the remedy that states Alkiver is desysopped. I'm of personal belief that the words "stripped of his administrative privileges" is possibly a little heavy handed. How about something a little more neutral like "is to have his administrator privileges revoked". Just something for you to consider. Ryan Postlethwaite 15:25, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Done. FloNight ♥♥♥ 22:51, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
I'm not sure what wording would be appropriate so I won't suggest anything specific on the workshop, but I had a comment. 7 of the 14 links on the FoF about Alkivar's adminship link to logs; maybe a note about proper log entries should be included in the principles, either as a separate principle or under " Communication". Milto LOL pia 01:49, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
A new essay I started yesterday, intended in general terms but specifically inspired by the multiple leniency experiments that have been proposed in this case. Basically, you can't squeeze blood from a turnip. Extreme gestures of good faith and leniency aren't necessary when an editor shows no hint of remorse. Durova Charge! 17:41, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Kirill and Flo, don't you think a finding (and remedy, depending on the finding) should be part of the decision? See the workshop, he's certainly part of the dispute too. A finding one way or another regarding his status would be appreciated. Picaroon (t) 00:59, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
The subsection title Burntsauce is sock of a banned user should probably have "sock" replaced with the word "puppet", since the text reads that he may be a meatpuppet or a sockpuppet. This isn't important by any stretch, but it seems like something that should be done anyways. Cheers, The Hybrid T/ C 04:44, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Under the "Decorum" statement shouldn't the move to de-sysop and block Eyrian for incivility and sockpuppetry during the trivia edit war be added as a possible decision? –– Lid( Talk) 12:59, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Flonight's comment in her oppose for Proposed remedy 1.1 suggests that there is private evidence supporting the decisions here. If this is indeed the case, could the final decision make it clear? This seems important, particularly if the Committee is indeed taking the unusual step of barring an RfA. Chick Bowen 03:07, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
I am not sure where best to post this, but it seems like it will be seen here. I just wanted to encourage the arbiters to close this case now (as they seem inclined to do) and take up the related Eyrian matter as a separate case. It is better to move forward with these remedies now; they have the clear support of the committee and can enter into force while sanctions (if necessary) on others ar considered. Eluchil404 08:05, 7 November 2007 (UTC)