![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 50 | ← | Archive 52 | Archive 53 | Archive 54 | Archive 55 | Archive 56 | → | Archive 60 |
... is there a list somewhere of sources that have had a consensus declaring them to be not reliable, i.e. that fail to be an RS, e.g. the latest being The Daily Mail? The Rambling Man ( talk) 15:34, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
As a heads-up, there is a discussion centering around whether or not attributed opinions need coverage by secondary sources in order to use said opinion in articles. This discussion would greatly benefit from input from editors that understand WP:UNDUE, WP:FRINGE, as well as basic Wikipedia sourcing policies. Thanks. That man from Nantucket ( talk) 22:39, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Perhaps an expansion of the sections on primary and secondary sources would be good.
Why exactly are secondary sources prefered to primary sources, and why would primary sources be unreliable?
Benjamin ( talk) 23:40, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 50 | ← | Archive 52 | Archive 53 | Archive 54 | Archive 55 | Archive 56 | → | Archive 60 |
... is there a list somewhere of sources that have had a consensus declaring them to be not reliable, i.e. that fail to be an RS, e.g. the latest being The Daily Mail? The Rambling Man ( talk) 15:34, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
As a heads-up, there is a discussion centering around whether or not attributed opinions need coverage by secondary sources in order to use said opinion in articles. This discussion would greatly benefit from input from editors that understand WP:UNDUE, WP:FRINGE, as well as basic Wikipedia sourcing policies. Thanks. That man from Nantucket ( talk) 22:39, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Perhaps an expansion of the sections on primary and secondary sources would be good.
Why exactly are secondary sources prefered to primary sources, and why would primary sources be unreliable?
Benjamin ( talk) 23:40, 16 February 2017 (UTC)