![]() | Astronomy: Astronomical objects Project‑class | |||||||||
|
Comment is requested on whether the proposed policy for determining the notability of extrasolar planets, their host stars, and other planetary-mass bodies should be adopted as a supplement to WP:NASTRO.
Maybe a section called "Dealing with extrasolar planets", inside section " #Examples"? It doesn't seem specific enough to merge into the general "criteria" section, in my humble and not-really-very-informed-about-this-topic opinion. -- Enric Naval ( talk) 16:08, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
I'm curious to know if User:Wer900 has a test case in mind. This proposed guideline seems so needlessly technical and specific (although I am a history major and not too bright about the sciences). The proposal looks so much like a solution looking for a problem that I have to believe there's a host of articles in the crosshairs. Chris Troutman ( talk) 02:57, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
Excellent work. Kudos to all who contributed. Merge it with WP:NASTRO. Provide instructions for removing en masse enormous numbers of space object articles that fail this and WP:NASTRO. As this will have to be done by bot, there are many technical issues. Probably all info regarding objects failing this and nastro should be moved from articles to lists. Exactly how the list should be set up to receive this information should be discussed. Alternatively, the info could be dumped and re-gotten whenever it's needed from the same place it was gotten in the first place. This and NASTRO have to be not only ceremonial documents but also actually implemented in terms of the masses of articles failing this and NASTRO that have all been created. The bot should be taught to seek out and delete all NASTRO failing articles, and either re-place them on a list or just get rid of their contents. Please help because the existence of NASTRO failing articles defies NASTRO, WP:GNG, and makes it difficult to say that Wikipedia articles require notability when they clearly do not as long as these articles exist. Chrisrus ( talk) 15:15, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
![]() | Astronomy: Astronomical objects Project‑class | |||||||||
|
Comment is requested on whether the proposed policy for determining the notability of extrasolar planets, their host stars, and other planetary-mass bodies should be adopted as a supplement to WP:NASTRO.
Maybe a section called "Dealing with extrasolar planets", inside section " #Examples"? It doesn't seem specific enough to merge into the general "criteria" section, in my humble and not-really-very-informed-about-this-topic opinion. -- Enric Naval ( talk) 16:08, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
I'm curious to know if User:Wer900 has a test case in mind. This proposed guideline seems so needlessly technical and specific (although I am a history major and not too bright about the sciences). The proposal looks so much like a solution looking for a problem that I have to believe there's a host of articles in the crosshairs. Chris Troutman ( talk) 02:57, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
Excellent work. Kudos to all who contributed. Merge it with WP:NASTRO. Provide instructions for removing en masse enormous numbers of space object articles that fail this and WP:NASTRO. As this will have to be done by bot, there are many technical issues. Probably all info regarding objects failing this and nastro should be moved from articles to lists. Exactly how the list should be set up to receive this information should be discussed. Alternatively, the info could be dumped and re-gotten whenever it's needed from the same place it was gotten in the first place. This and NASTRO have to be not only ceremonial documents but also actually implemented in terms of the masses of articles failing this and NASTRO that have all been created. The bot should be taught to seek out and delete all NASTRO failing articles, and either re-place them on a list or just get rid of their contents. Please help because the existence of NASTRO failing articles defies NASTRO, WP:GNG, and makes it difficult to say that Wikipedia articles require notability when they clearly do not as long as these articles exist. Chrisrus ( talk) 15:15, 21 July 2013 (UTC)