This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
No disclaimers page. |
|
Archives:
1Auto-archiving period: 360 days
![]() |
![]() | See WP:PROPOSAL for Wikipedia's procedural policy on the creation of new guidelines and policies. See how to contribute to Wikipedia guidance for recommendations regarding the creation and updating of policy and guideline pages. |
This seems like a really important article, why isn't it protected? 68.50.116.194 ( talk) 22:00, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
Wikipedia:NDA and has thus listed it
for discussion. This discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 22#Wikipedia:NDA until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Aasim -
Herrscher of Wikis
21:09, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
"In fact, all articles already have a disclaimer, linked at the bottom of this page and every other page on Wikipedia." The disclaimer is accessible from mobile web by clicking the burgur menu. While this certainly makes it accessible from every article page, the user has to do an action to view the disclaimer link. Is it accurate to say "linked at every other page/linked at the bottom of every other page"? Squeezdakat ( talk) 04:18, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
I propose adding the following to #Acceptable disclaimers:
The suicide and suicide methods articles contain hatnotes that link to suicide prevention.
This change would codify the consensus reached at the RFC for Suicide and RFC for Suicide methods. I don't believe there was consensus at the RFCs to have a disclaimer on the broader category of suicide-related articles, so I want to make sure this exception is narrowly written. That's why I'm listing only these two articles as an "acceptable disclaimer". If additional articles use the hatnote, there should be community consensus to override the general rule against disclaimers. I'd appreciate any thoughts others might have.
@ Tamzin, Freedom4U, Mitch Ames, and AirshipJungleman29: Pinging for awareness, due to the related discussion at Talk:Sanctioned Suicide. Edge3 ( talk) 03:37, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
No disclaimers page. |
|
Archives:
1Auto-archiving period: 360 days
![]() |
![]() | See WP:PROPOSAL for Wikipedia's procedural policy on the creation of new guidelines and policies. See how to contribute to Wikipedia guidance for recommendations regarding the creation and updating of policy and guideline pages. |
This seems like a really important article, why isn't it protected? 68.50.116.194 ( talk) 22:00, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
Wikipedia:NDA and has thus listed it
for discussion. This discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 22#Wikipedia:NDA until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Aasim -
Herrscher of Wikis
21:09, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
"In fact, all articles already have a disclaimer, linked at the bottom of this page and every other page on Wikipedia." The disclaimer is accessible from mobile web by clicking the burgur menu. While this certainly makes it accessible from every article page, the user has to do an action to view the disclaimer link. Is it accurate to say "linked at every other page/linked at the bottom of every other page"? Squeezdakat ( talk) 04:18, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
I propose adding the following to #Acceptable disclaimers:
The suicide and suicide methods articles contain hatnotes that link to suicide prevention.
This change would codify the consensus reached at the RFC for Suicide and RFC for Suicide methods. I don't believe there was consensus at the RFCs to have a disclaimer on the broader category of suicide-related articles, so I want to make sure this exception is narrowly written. That's why I'm listing only these two articles as an "acceptable disclaimer". If additional articles use the hatnote, there should be community consensus to override the general rule against disclaimers. I'd appreciate any thoughts others might have.
@ Tamzin, Freedom4U, Mitch Ames, and AirshipJungleman29: Pinging for awareness, due to the related discussion at Talk:Sanctioned Suicide. Edge3 ( talk) 03:37, 17 August 2023 (UTC)