Should "Britannica versus Wikipedia references" be a FUI? I mean, like Tewy said: "That's about the same as banning all vandalism nominations." Chrishy man 18:36, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- Like I said, maybe we should include a disclaimer (such as "Do not explicitly mention a Britannica vs. Wikipedia reference as it will rarely be approved, however, if the links make the reference, the motto has a higher chance of being approved.") Is that good? ~ Magnus animum ( aka Steptrip) 23:23, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- Sounds acceptable. I like it Chrishy man 21:00, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
- I'm going to transfer this discussion to WT:MOTD/N, where everyone seems to be. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 22:16, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Should "Britannica versus Wikipedia references" be a FUI? I mean, like Tewy said: "That's about the same as banning all vandalism nominations." Chrishy man 18:36, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- Like I said, maybe we should include a disclaimer (such as "Do not explicitly mention a Britannica vs. Wikipedia reference as it will rarely be approved, however, if the links make the reference, the motto has a higher chance of being approved.") Is that good? ~ Magnus animum ( aka Steptrip) 23:23, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- Sounds acceptable. I like it Chrishy man 21:00, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
- I'm going to transfer this discussion to WT:MOTD/N, where everyone seems to be. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 22:16, 28 April 2007 (UTC)