For some reason a few with bad titles have got through the last bot run. See List of Wansapanataym episodes for example Lyndaship ( talk) 09:03, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Looking through the last lot I'm not sure if the output generated by the bot is what you desire see Rob Bonta. Unfortunately an editor (User:Johnj1995) on 17/18 Oct tried to sort out a lot of these title insertions by removing the title completely and marking the link dead leaving the bot with no title to replace resulting in a rather mangled output. I don't know if you consider this a problem, if you don't fine but otherwise if the bot can't be amended I wonder if a rollback of all his edits will let the bot sort it. The problem exists with a number from the last batch (due to the difference between when I added them to the list and the bot running) and a condsiderable number from this batch Lyndaship ( talk) 14:11, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
{{
cite web}}
and left a bare URL, not good. My bot responded with a {{
usurped}}
which is OK, but obviously not as good as cite web woud have been; the bot has no way of restoring the original cite. My bot also didn't remove the {{dead link}}
when converting to {{
usurped}}
, that could be fixed. --
Green
C
15:01, 24 October 2022 (UTC){{
dead link}}
tags. Also I'd be curious to see an example of "half having no subsequent edits" as that sounds like an oversight in the bot or my process flow. --
Green
C
16:24, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
{{
usurped}}
so other bots don't convert the square-links into {{
cite web}}
thus re-opening the usurpation problem. {{
usurped}}
is sort of like a flag telling other bots (and people) the underlying URL has been usurped! I'll add Please check if http://archive.rubicon-foundation.org is related to this problem, · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 07:44, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
User:Lyndaship, there are 28 domains in the waiting list, enough for batch 8. I will wait until you say ready to run. -- Green C 23:02, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Someone was thoughtful to spam WP:URLREQ with a JUDI domain: Special:Diff/1121212361/1121222360 -- Green C 05:04, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
I have updated some references to the classlessactions.com website, such as on the Commonwealth Bank ( diff), Aveo Group ( diff), and 7-Eleven ( diff) webpages, marking the url-status as dead and (in some cases) adding archive links that were missing. I think that the classlessactions.com site now looks like something related to gambling, and nothing like the site seen in the archive links.
Earlier today, I saw this addition to the 7-Eleven article. It contains an article text hyperlink to the ibonmobile.com.tw website, which seemed inappropriate to me. Reviewing Wiki policy and guidelines on external links leads me to think that including the ibonmobile website in the EL section of the 7-Eleven article is not justified as it is too tangential to the main topic of the page. I was considering whether to add the ibonmobile.com.tw site as a reference, or simply remove what I think is an inappropriate external link. While looking into these policies / guidelines, I came across this page, and wondered whether the classlessactions.com references that I changed a while back are an example of the website usurption that this page describes? Advice please. Thanks, 1.141.198.161 ( talk) 02:49, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
For some reason a few with bad titles have got through the last bot run. See List of Wansapanataym episodes for example Lyndaship ( talk) 09:03, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Looking through the last lot I'm not sure if the output generated by the bot is what you desire see Rob Bonta. Unfortunately an editor (User:Johnj1995) on 17/18 Oct tried to sort out a lot of these title insertions by removing the title completely and marking the link dead leaving the bot with no title to replace resulting in a rather mangled output. I don't know if you consider this a problem, if you don't fine but otherwise if the bot can't be amended I wonder if a rollback of all his edits will let the bot sort it. The problem exists with a number from the last batch (due to the difference between when I added them to the list and the bot running) and a condsiderable number from this batch Lyndaship ( talk) 14:11, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
{{
cite web}}
and left a bare URL, not good. My bot responded with a {{
usurped}}
which is OK, but obviously not as good as cite web woud have been; the bot has no way of restoring the original cite. My bot also didn't remove the {{dead link}}
when converting to {{
usurped}}
, that could be fixed. --
Green
C
15:01, 24 October 2022 (UTC){{
dead link}}
tags. Also I'd be curious to see an example of "half having no subsequent edits" as that sounds like an oversight in the bot or my process flow. --
Green
C
16:24, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
{{
usurped}}
so other bots don't convert the square-links into {{
cite web}}
thus re-opening the usurpation problem. {{
usurped}}
is sort of like a flag telling other bots (and people) the underlying URL has been usurped! I'll add Please check if http://archive.rubicon-foundation.org is related to this problem, · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 07:44, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
User:Lyndaship, there are 28 domains in the waiting list, enough for batch 8. I will wait until you say ready to run. -- Green C 23:02, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Someone was thoughtful to spam WP:URLREQ with a JUDI domain: Special:Diff/1121212361/1121222360 -- Green C 05:04, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
I have updated some references to the classlessactions.com website, such as on the Commonwealth Bank ( diff), Aveo Group ( diff), and 7-Eleven ( diff) webpages, marking the url-status as dead and (in some cases) adding archive links that were missing. I think that the classlessactions.com site now looks like something related to gambling, and nothing like the site seen in the archive links.
Earlier today, I saw this addition to the 7-Eleven article. It contains an article text hyperlink to the ibonmobile.com.tw website, which seemed inappropriate to me. Reviewing Wiki policy and guidelines on external links leads me to think that including the ibonmobile website in the EL section of the 7-Eleven article is not justified as it is too tangential to the main topic of the page. I was considering whether to add the ibonmobile.com.tw site as a reference, or simply remove what I think is an inappropriate external link. While looking into these policies / guidelines, I came across this page, and wondered whether the classlessactions.com references that I changed a while back are an example of the website usurption that this page describes? Advice please. Thanks, 1.141.198.161 ( talk) 02:49, 2 January 2024 (UTC)