Essays Low‑impact | ||||||||||
|
Propose moving this to WP:WikiProject Climate change as a project WP:ADVICEPAGE. NewsAndEventsGuy ( talk) 19:10, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
wordsmithing the appropiate glue"; some things should not be glued together into a gigantic tarball. The appropriate "wordsmithing" is to structure matters into manageable modules, and at appropriate levels. The problem in putting this section into a Project level discussion is that it gets mixed into other discussions, to the confusion and detriment of all. The appropriate place for discussing a topic "X" is (generally) at "Talk:X". (I say "generally", as sub-topics, especially where they strongly parallel, or may not have much discussion specific to them) are often consolidated into a higher level. Thus the discussion that can be reasonably expected on theAR5/AR4/FAR/SAR/TAR/AR6 subtopics is best consolidated under IPCC_citation.) To the extent that IPCC citation is included within a Project it is sufficient to have link pointing here. ♦ J. Johnson (JJ) ( talk) 19:44, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
FYI, if it's an oversight, please add inline citation template for the full volumes so those entries follow the same pattern and look like the entries for the subparts. If its intentional, please add add an explanatory note to aide the unwary's understanding. NewsAndEventsGuy ( talk) 19:09, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
Thanks JJ for all your work on IPCC citations! NewsAndEventsGuy ( talk) 19:38, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
I just tagged this "essay". As you may know, there is a confusing mishmash between info pages, help pages, essay pages etc. In terms of policy and guideline, they have all been classified as the equivalent "clout" of an essay. That's the technical letter of policy. ( WP:CONLEVEL). However, for a while I was really working hard at doing assessment and classification of our thousands of pages in these categories. My experience is that "on the street" there is a perception of a bit more clout for "information pages" than mere essays. We could discuss elevating this to an information page, but it seems reasonable (to me) to get some broad input for that. And in any case, I'm not going further on this now since the whole thing is still being developed. (My compliments on the AR5 formatting, JJ, it's much more user friendly than the AR4 version.) NewsAndEventsGuy ( talk) 23:33, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Essays Low‑impact | ||||||||||
|
Propose moving this to WP:WikiProject Climate change as a project WP:ADVICEPAGE. NewsAndEventsGuy ( talk) 19:10, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
wordsmithing the appropiate glue"; some things should not be glued together into a gigantic tarball. The appropriate "wordsmithing" is to structure matters into manageable modules, and at appropriate levels. The problem in putting this section into a Project level discussion is that it gets mixed into other discussions, to the confusion and detriment of all. The appropriate place for discussing a topic "X" is (generally) at "Talk:X". (I say "generally", as sub-topics, especially where they strongly parallel, or may not have much discussion specific to them) are often consolidated into a higher level. Thus the discussion that can be reasonably expected on theAR5/AR4/FAR/SAR/TAR/AR6 subtopics is best consolidated under IPCC_citation.) To the extent that IPCC citation is included within a Project it is sufficient to have link pointing here. ♦ J. Johnson (JJ) ( talk) 19:44, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
FYI, if it's an oversight, please add inline citation template for the full volumes so those entries follow the same pattern and look like the entries for the subparts. If its intentional, please add add an explanatory note to aide the unwary's understanding. NewsAndEventsGuy ( talk) 19:09, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
Thanks JJ for all your work on IPCC citations! NewsAndEventsGuy ( talk) 19:38, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
I just tagged this "essay". As you may know, there is a confusing mishmash between info pages, help pages, essay pages etc. In terms of policy and guideline, they have all been classified as the equivalent "clout" of an essay. That's the technical letter of policy. ( WP:CONLEVEL). However, for a while I was really working hard at doing assessment and classification of our thousands of pages in these categories. My experience is that "on the street" there is a perception of a bit more clout for "information pages" than mere essays. We could discuss elevating this to an information page, but it seems reasonable (to me) to get some broad input for that. And in any case, I'm not going further on this now since the whole thing is still being developed. (My compliments on the AR5 formatting, JJ, it's much more user friendly than the AR4 version.) NewsAndEventsGuy ( talk) 23:33, 14 August 2019 (UTC)