From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject icon Essays Low‑impact
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia essays, a collaborative effort to organise and monitor the impact of Wikipedia essays. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. For a listing of essays see the essay directory.
LowThis page has been rated as Low-impact on the project's impact scale.
Note icon
The above rating was automatically assessed using data on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links.

Background

   It occurs to me that there might be reason to regard the following as mere, or mostly, vanity (however perverse a form of vanity) and much or all of it might be dropped out of the essay, but even so, preserving such vanity in its first-saved-revision form would, here (heh, heh) on this talk page, be treated as harmless background:

The first contributor to this essay -- a self-confessed obsessive-compulsive, who is aware that this essay probably only represents a minority viewpoint -- has made a practice of writing, instead, either "on the accompanying article page" (or -- when willing to stop and think about whether only one article is under discussion) "in the article". That contributor also sees piping the word "here", on talk pages, to this essay as an alternative (and perhaps less distracting) practice, that still lessens the opportunity for confusion that is at least theoretically invited by the ambiguous use of "here", which use seems to be reflexive for many of our colleagues.

-- Jerzyt 22:56, 9 January 2015 (UTC) reply

The solution familiar from German Wikipedia is "overleaf" ... -- Florian Blaschke ( talk) 22:14, 21 March 2018 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject icon Essays Low‑impact
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia essays, a collaborative effort to organise and monitor the impact of Wikipedia essays. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. For a listing of essays see the essay directory.
LowThis page has been rated as Low-impact on the project's impact scale.
Note icon
The above rating was automatically assessed using data on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links.

Background

   It occurs to me that there might be reason to regard the following as mere, or mostly, vanity (however perverse a form of vanity) and much or all of it might be dropped out of the essay, but even so, preserving such vanity in its first-saved-revision form would, here (heh, heh) on this talk page, be treated as harmless background:

The first contributor to this essay -- a self-confessed obsessive-compulsive, who is aware that this essay probably only represents a minority viewpoint -- has made a practice of writing, instead, either "on the accompanying article page" (or -- when willing to stop and think about whether only one article is under discussion) "in the article". That contributor also sees piping the word "here", on talk pages, to this essay as an alternative (and perhaps less distracting) practice, that still lessens the opportunity for confusion that is at least theoretically invited by the ambiguous use of "here", which use seems to be reflexive for many of our colleagues.

-- Jerzyt 22:56, 9 January 2015 (UTC) reply

The solution familiar from German Wikipedia is "overleaf" ... -- Florian Blaschke ( talk) 22:14, 21 March 2018 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook