FAC Nominator User:Northwesterner1
Stats excerpted as of 3 March 2023. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 22:34, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Please set up separate sections for each nomination
I nominate Hawkeye7 for the monumental effort to retain the star at Hanford Site, requiring an almost complete rewrite. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 16:28, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Hawkeye7 Thanks for working on this article! I see that this FAR just closed, and I hadn't noticed until today. I actually have some concerns about the article. I don't think it's particularly clear, especially in the lead, that this cleanup is ongoing. You have to dig through the article a bit to find statements like, Of the four areas that were formally listed as Superfund sites on October 4, 1989, only one has been removed from the list following cleanup
. I'm also not sure that the role of Indigenous people in the cleanup is well covered. The only statement about their involvement is in the sentence that The cleanup effort was managed by the DOE under the oversight of the two regulatory agencies. A citizen-led Hanford Advisory Board provides recommendations from community stakeholders, including local and state governments, regional environmental organizations, business interests, and Native American tribes
.
But I can find
reports of a multi-generational Indigenous cleanup effort and that Today [2022], their outreach work has reached a fever pitch
. So maybe their work should be mentioned a little beyond some recommendations made to the DOE?
In summary, I think it should be clearer that this cleanup is incomplete, ongoing, and that Indigenous people have a leadership role in that cleanup. Sorry I'm late to the discussion!! Larataguera ( talk) 17:59, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
FAC Nominator User:Northwesterner1
Stats excerpted as of 3 March 2023. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 22:34, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Please set up separate sections for each nomination
I nominate Hawkeye7 for the monumental effort to retain the star at Hanford Site, requiring an almost complete rewrite. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 16:28, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Hawkeye7 Thanks for working on this article! I see that this FAR just closed, and I hadn't noticed until today. I actually have some concerns about the article. I don't think it's particularly clear, especially in the lead, that this cleanup is ongoing. You have to dig through the article a bit to find statements like, Of the four areas that were formally listed as Superfund sites on October 4, 1989, only one has been removed from the list following cleanup
. I'm also not sure that the role of Indigenous people in the cleanup is well covered. The only statement about their involvement is in the sentence that The cleanup effort was managed by the DOE under the oversight of the two regulatory agencies. A citizen-led Hanford Advisory Board provides recommendations from community stakeholders, including local and state governments, regional environmental organizations, business interests, and Native American tribes
.
But I can find
reports of a multi-generational Indigenous cleanup effort and that Today [2022], their outreach work has reached a fever pitch
. So maybe their work should be mentioned a little beyond some recommendations made to the DOE?
In summary, I think it should be clearer that this cleanup is incomplete, ongoing, and that Indigenous people have a leadership role in that cleanup. Sorry I'm late to the discussion!! Larataguera ( talk) 17:59, 4 March 2023 (UTC)