![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I think that the following criterion could be defined more clearly:
The featured topic director, GamerPro64, or his delegate Juhachi, determine the timing of the process for each nomination. For a nomination to be promoted to FT or GT status, consensus must be reached for a group to be promoted to featured or good topic status.
I am going to recommend that we follow the WP:FPC guidelines of:
For promotion, if an image is listed here for ten days with five or more reviewers in support and the consensus is in its favor, it can be added to the Wikipedia:Featured pictures list. Consensus is generally regarded to be a two-third majority in support, including the nominator and/or creator of the image; however, anonymous votes are generally disregarded, as are opinions of sockpuppets.
Rephrased for our project:
For promotion, if a topic is listed here for ten days with five or more reviewers in support and the consensus is in its favor, it can be promoted. Consensus is generally regarded to be a two-third majority in support, including the nominator(s) of the topic; however, anonymous votes are generally disregarded, as are opinions of sockpuppets.
Thoughts? Kees08 (Talk) 19:59, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
Happy 2019 to those of you that follow the human calendar, or 1001110101001100101 to those that have evolved and only speak binary ;-) I've been through the GT/FT process a couple of times now over the last couple of years and I am wondering if there is a way to make some of these processes easier to do and thus drive up participation? My first note is that the process to add 1 article to a 20 article topic is the same as getting the original 20 article topic approved, that seems overly complicated IMO. Instead of having FT and GT queues perhaps there could be a queue for additions, checked by "a trusted member" and the other queue can be new topics (Feature or Good). If it's passed the first time then a cursory check that the new article fits in, isn't missing anything etc. is 10 times easier to do. Thoughts? MPJ-DK ( talk) 01:40, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi. The Good Topic Wikipedia:Featured topics/Gascon campaign of 1345 has just had a second of its three articles promoted to FA. I believe that this makes the whole topic featured. Is it OK for me to move it from the list of GTs to the list of FTs, or is there a set procedure? Thanks. Gog the Mild ( talk) 13:03, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/Marvel Cinematic Universe films/addition4. I'm wondering if it's necessary to file a WP:FTRC if, since the most recent update, three new articles have come under the purview of the topic, but none of them have been to GAN ( Talk:Captain Marvel (film), Talk:Avengers: Endgame and Talk:Spider-Man: Far From Home), and one of the previous ones has actually been delisted ( Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Black Panther (film)/1). I've seen it implied that (for that particular topic?) articles under that heading need to be GA nominated by a certain date, but not necessarily that the topic would automatically be demoted after a certain period of time. Hijiri 88 ( 聖 やや) 02:14, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I think that the following criterion could be defined more clearly:
The featured topic director, GamerPro64, or his delegate Juhachi, determine the timing of the process for each nomination. For a nomination to be promoted to FT or GT status, consensus must be reached for a group to be promoted to featured or good topic status.
I am going to recommend that we follow the WP:FPC guidelines of:
For promotion, if an image is listed here for ten days with five or more reviewers in support and the consensus is in its favor, it can be added to the Wikipedia:Featured pictures list. Consensus is generally regarded to be a two-third majority in support, including the nominator and/or creator of the image; however, anonymous votes are generally disregarded, as are opinions of sockpuppets.
Rephrased for our project:
For promotion, if a topic is listed here for ten days with five or more reviewers in support and the consensus is in its favor, it can be promoted. Consensus is generally regarded to be a two-third majority in support, including the nominator(s) of the topic; however, anonymous votes are generally disregarded, as are opinions of sockpuppets.
Thoughts? Kees08 (Talk) 19:59, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
Happy 2019 to those of you that follow the human calendar, or 1001110101001100101 to those that have evolved and only speak binary ;-) I've been through the GT/FT process a couple of times now over the last couple of years and I am wondering if there is a way to make some of these processes easier to do and thus drive up participation? My first note is that the process to add 1 article to a 20 article topic is the same as getting the original 20 article topic approved, that seems overly complicated IMO. Instead of having FT and GT queues perhaps there could be a queue for additions, checked by "a trusted member" and the other queue can be new topics (Feature or Good). If it's passed the first time then a cursory check that the new article fits in, isn't missing anything etc. is 10 times easier to do. Thoughts? MPJ-DK ( talk) 01:40, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi. The Good Topic Wikipedia:Featured topics/Gascon campaign of 1345 has just had a second of its three articles promoted to FA. I believe that this makes the whole topic featured. Is it OK for me to move it from the list of GTs to the list of FTs, or is there a set procedure? Thanks. Gog the Mild ( talk) 13:03, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/Marvel Cinematic Universe films/addition4. I'm wondering if it's necessary to file a WP:FTRC if, since the most recent update, three new articles have come under the purview of the topic, but none of them have been to GAN ( Talk:Captain Marvel (film), Talk:Avengers: Endgame and Talk:Spider-Man: Far From Home), and one of the previous ones has actually been delisted ( Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Black Panther (film)/1). I've seen it implied that (for that particular topic?) articles under that heading need to be GA nominated by a certain date, but not necessarily that the topic would automatically be demoted after a certain period of time. Hijiri 88 ( 聖 やや) 02:14, 15 October 2019 (UTC)