This page has archives. Sections older than 700 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Some one has edited the language of uttar pradesh without any source, https://www.uponline.in/about/profile/culture/languages-of-uttar-pradesh Here the source link for census result, Bhojpuri is second most spoken language of UP, Still he updated some unknown languages which is not aware by anyone in uttar pradesh, please revert the page to 20-25 days back condition Saurabh Kumar Chaubey ( talk) 13:12, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Where does one find definitive information on the status and list/archive of their past, closed and open dispute requests? Essentially, the title says it all. This is asking a generic community relevant question, which may have been answered elsewhere but a preliminary search on Wikipedia and on search engines do not give a concise and complete definitive answer. MMmpds ( talk) 23:41, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello Mediator, I have been forced to come here on the advise of Arnold Reinhold Sir due to the strange activities of User Ekdalian. I want to state the VEDAS as a source of Baidya Caste position. As you might be knowing, VEDAS are the highest authority in Hinduism. VEDAS are considered the Divine Truth. But Ekdalian is threatening me with Account Block, and also stating that Vedas and Puranas cannot be mentioned as source, but amusingly "TAMPERED PURANAS" are clearly mentioned as source in the present Baidya article. I AM REALLY SHOCKED AND SADDENED TO SEE SUCH INSULT OF VEDAS.
So I request the Mediator to help me in the cause of stating VEDAS as a source in this article.
Anirban Kolkata Anirban Kolkata ( talk) 07:51, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Please see the notice at the top of this page. Requests for dispute resolution are not accepted from this talk page. — TransporterMan ( TALK) 19:48, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
G'day, I would like to know about the DR protocol sequence. We have long term disput with lots of discussions in TP so I prepared DRN request upon agreement to come here, but we never formally went through any methods that precede DRN - we didn't request for third opinion, and we didn't request for comment. My my question is, first, can we skip these procedures that precede the DRN, is that OK even, and second, if we fail here, can we go back and request for a comment, etc.
౪ Santa ౪
99°
09:54, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
This page has archives. Sections older than 700 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Some one has edited the language of uttar pradesh without any source, https://www.uponline.in/about/profile/culture/languages-of-uttar-pradesh Here the source link for census result, Bhojpuri is second most spoken language of UP, Still he updated some unknown languages which is not aware by anyone in uttar pradesh, please revert the page to 20-25 days back condition Saurabh Kumar Chaubey ( talk) 13:12, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Where does one find definitive information on the status and list/archive of their past, closed and open dispute requests? Essentially, the title says it all. This is asking a generic community relevant question, which may have been answered elsewhere but a preliminary search on Wikipedia and on search engines do not give a concise and complete definitive answer. MMmpds ( talk) 23:41, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello Mediator, I have been forced to come here on the advise of Arnold Reinhold Sir due to the strange activities of User Ekdalian. I want to state the VEDAS as a source of Baidya Caste position. As you might be knowing, VEDAS are the highest authority in Hinduism. VEDAS are considered the Divine Truth. But Ekdalian is threatening me with Account Block, and also stating that Vedas and Puranas cannot be mentioned as source, but amusingly "TAMPERED PURANAS" are clearly mentioned as source in the present Baidya article. I AM REALLY SHOCKED AND SADDENED TO SEE SUCH INSULT OF VEDAS.
So I request the Mediator to help me in the cause of stating VEDAS as a source in this article.
Anirban Kolkata Anirban Kolkata ( talk) 07:51, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Please see the notice at the top of this page. Requests for dispute resolution are not accepted from this talk page. — TransporterMan ( TALK) 19:48, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
G'day, I would like to know about the DR protocol sequence. We have long term disput with lots of discussions in TP so I prepared DRN request upon agreement to come here, but we never formally went through any methods that precede DRN - we didn't request for third opinion, and we didn't request for comment. My my question is, first, can we skip these procedures that precede the DRN, is that OK even, and second, if we fail here, can we go back and request for a comment, etc.
౪ Santa ౪
99°
09:54, 19 July 2024 (UTC)