This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I have written an article Mahatma Gandhi Central University protest which was accepted for article for creation on 27 December 2019 but some users copied text from sources which were (Times of India, The Telegraph The wire and The Quint ) newspapers of India and pasted them to the article which violated the copy right policy of Wikipedia and the page was deleted. I didn't even get enough time to fix the problem. It took almost 3 months to summarize the independent reliable sources to write this article. As Wikipedia plays a vital role in letting world know about the important things across the globe. Hope you'd love to help me in inclusion of one of the India's topic to the Wikipedia so that whole world may know about it. Now, I want to remove all the copied text from the article and will write my own words in place of copied text so that it may not be deleted again for violating the Wikipedia's policy. This article may be the helpful to the researchers and students who are curious to explore India. Therefore, you are requested to undo the deletion and restoration the page. From now, I'll try my level best not to violate Wikipedia's policies. So, Could you please restore the page once ? Waiting for your kind reply. Thanking you-- Rohitmishra111 ( talk) 17:46, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
@ Rohitmishra111: You need to ask the deleting admin, 331dot first, and if that doesn't work out, post to WP:DRV.-- Deep fried okra 18:12, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
@ Rohitmishra111: I don't see where anyone but you added content to this page.-- Deep fried okra 18:15, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
I see you already asked 331dot. Next step is WP:DRV. I think 331dot's offer to mail you the txt so you can write in own words is the best choice.-- Deep fried okra 18:18, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
We're getting minimal compliance with the rule that you should talk to the closing admin before opening a DRV. So, I'm thinking we should ask that DRVClerk be modified to create a page notice for each new daily page it generates. The notice would say something like, "Yo, dummy, have you talked to the closing admin yet?" Specific wording might need to be tweaked, but you get the idea. -- RoySmith (talk) 18:36, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
WP:DELREVD includes: "Consider attempting to discuss the matter with the closer". I think that new DRV nominators routinely skim read WP:DELREVD.
Repeatedly, recently, the failure of nominators to discuss with the closer, has been mentioned. Often, the context is that the nominator would have benefited from doing so.
The same issue was well addressed at WP:Move review by including in the header template the "Discussion with closer" link. I think this has been very helpful, working by providing review nominators with examples in previous cases. In practice, the "Discussion with closer" link has to be manually added, and if the nominator leaves it as a redlink then it is an appropriately pointy reminder of something not done. This doesn't make it mandatory, but does encourage it.
I suggest adding this "Discussion with closer" link to the template {{ DRV links}}. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 00:40, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Experienced Wikipedians can and should talk to the closer first, of course. I'm talking about how we look to outsiders.— S Marshall T/ C 14:45, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Does anyone else think that putting an LTA in a hatnote on a high-profile page like DRV gives too much attention to the LTA? Leviv ich 04:28, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I have written an article Mahatma Gandhi Central University protest which was accepted for article for creation on 27 December 2019 but some users copied text from sources which were (Times of India, The Telegraph The wire and The Quint ) newspapers of India and pasted them to the article which violated the copy right policy of Wikipedia and the page was deleted. I didn't even get enough time to fix the problem. It took almost 3 months to summarize the independent reliable sources to write this article. As Wikipedia plays a vital role in letting world know about the important things across the globe. Hope you'd love to help me in inclusion of one of the India's topic to the Wikipedia so that whole world may know about it. Now, I want to remove all the copied text from the article and will write my own words in place of copied text so that it may not be deleted again for violating the Wikipedia's policy. This article may be the helpful to the researchers and students who are curious to explore India. Therefore, you are requested to undo the deletion and restoration the page. From now, I'll try my level best not to violate Wikipedia's policies. So, Could you please restore the page once ? Waiting for your kind reply. Thanking you-- Rohitmishra111 ( talk) 17:46, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
@ Rohitmishra111: You need to ask the deleting admin, 331dot first, and if that doesn't work out, post to WP:DRV.-- Deep fried okra 18:12, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
@ Rohitmishra111: I don't see where anyone but you added content to this page.-- Deep fried okra 18:15, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
I see you already asked 331dot. Next step is WP:DRV. I think 331dot's offer to mail you the txt so you can write in own words is the best choice.-- Deep fried okra 18:18, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
We're getting minimal compliance with the rule that you should talk to the closing admin before opening a DRV. So, I'm thinking we should ask that DRVClerk be modified to create a page notice for each new daily page it generates. The notice would say something like, "Yo, dummy, have you talked to the closing admin yet?" Specific wording might need to be tweaked, but you get the idea. -- RoySmith (talk) 18:36, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
WP:DELREVD includes: "Consider attempting to discuss the matter with the closer". I think that new DRV nominators routinely skim read WP:DELREVD.
Repeatedly, recently, the failure of nominators to discuss with the closer, has been mentioned. Often, the context is that the nominator would have benefited from doing so.
The same issue was well addressed at WP:Move review by including in the header template the "Discussion with closer" link. I think this has been very helpful, working by providing review nominators with examples in previous cases. In practice, the "Discussion with closer" link has to be manually added, and if the nominator leaves it as a redlink then it is an appropriately pointy reminder of something not done. This doesn't make it mandatory, but does encourage it.
I suggest adding this "Discussion with closer" link to the template {{ DRV links}}. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 00:40, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Experienced Wikipedians can and should talk to the closer first, of course. I'm talking about how we look to outsiders.— S Marshall T/ C 14:45, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Does anyone else think that putting an LTA in a hatnote on a high-profile page like DRV gives too much attention to the LTA? Leviv ich 04:28, 31 January 2020 (UTC)