 | To help centralise discussions and keep related topics together, please start new conversations at Wikipedia talk:Database reports. |
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
How come today's update says
- Long pages; data as of 21:15, 19 March 2012 (UTC).
Did the bot really run several days ago, and it's only being posted now? Or was there a glitch of some sort?
—WWoods (
talk)
18:48, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
- The Toolserver's replication of the English Wikipedia database is broken, so the database is lagged by a few days. You can follow the status of the Toolserver here: < http://status.toolserver.org/>. There's also a note about the lagged reports at Wikipedia:Database reports/Announcements. Hope that helps. -- MZMcBride ( talk) 22:45, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
 | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I need the top list to be generated daily so that I can setup the proper bots to archive them. — Ahnoneemoos ( talk) 03:31, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Please contact the operator of the bot who updates the page - MZMcBride ( talk · contribs) - directly and ask them for what you need. Regards So Why 18:02, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- I saw this request earlier. It's unclear to me how daily updates would affect the ability to archive the pages (or mark the pages for archival). -- MZMcBride ( talk) 18:03, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
@ Snaevar: Please can we
- split the current column 3 into two, so that we can sort on current length?
- add an "edit section 0" link, after the current edit link?
-- Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:32, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- Go for splitting column 3 into two. Adding an section 0 is a different matter, it is not possbile to do that solely with an SQL query. You will probably need an bot to add the section link. Since I am not running a bot, I cannot help you with that.--
Snaevar (
talk)
20:17, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- @ Snaevar: Thank you. The column split was the more important tweak. I've done quite a bit of archiving in the last few days; coudl you rebuild the list, please, so I can see what's left? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:30, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
|
| To help centralise discussions and keep related topics together, please start new conversations at Wikipedia talk:Database reports. |
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
How come today's update says
- Long pages; data as of 21:15, 19 March 2012 (UTC).
Did the bot really run several days ago, and it's only being posted now? Or was there a glitch of some sort?
—WWoods (
talk)
18:48, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
- The Toolserver's replication of the English Wikipedia database is broken, so the database is lagged by a few days. You can follow the status of the Toolserver here: < http://status.toolserver.org/>. There's also a note about the lagged reports at Wikipedia:Database reports/Announcements. Hope that helps. -- MZMcBride ( talk) 22:45, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
|
| This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I need the top list to be generated daily so that I can setup the proper bots to archive them. — Ahnoneemoos ( talk) 03:31, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Please contact the operator of the bot who updates the page - MZMcBride ( talk · contribs) - directly and ask them for what you need. Regards So Why 18:02, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- I saw this request earlier. It's unclear to me how daily updates would affect the ability to archive the pages (or mark the pages for archival). -- MZMcBride ( talk) 18:03, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
@ Snaevar: Please can we
- split the current column 3 into two, so that we can sort on current length?
- add an "edit section 0" link, after the current edit link?
-- Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:32, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- Go for splitting column 3 into two. Adding an section 0 is a different matter, it is not possbile to do that solely with an SQL query. You will probably need an bot to add the section link. Since I am not running a bot, I cannot help you with that.--
Snaevar (
talk)
20:17, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- @ Snaevar: Thank you. The column split was the more important tweak. I've done quite a bit of archiving in the last few days; coudl you rebuild the list, please, so I can see what's left? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:30, 23 August 2015 (UTC)