This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Avoid using wikilinks page. |
|
This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
I'd like to move this piece to a guideline so that when people think it's a stupid idea and try to refute it, I have some muscle to back it up with. Who's with me? - Omegatron (User:Omegatron) 20:15, Apr 3, 2005 (UTC)
Call me lazy but when I was reading this article i really wanted to know what spagetti_code was. I wished that there was some way of me clicking on the word that would easily tell me what that word meant, and then I could keep reading this article with more understanding. Instead, I stopped reading the article, came on this discussion to complain and will next go look up spagetti code the old fashioned way and probably never come back to this page. Wikilinks could have prevented the mild annoyance and subsequent distraction of this accidental reader. I (common un-initiated wiki browser) LIKE convenient meaningful wikilinks. If you have a problem with them, fix the problems. 68.41.80.161 ( talk) 02:12, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
This is supposed to be humor? I would suggest that this be marked for deletion. Who agrees? Stigmatella aurantiaca ( talk) 13:59, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
This is worth keeping. Why do you not think this is funny ? buffbills ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:44, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
I think it's funny. Keep it. It's also annoying; but keep it anyway. CohuttaBlue ( talk) 14:14, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
How could you do every world as a wikilinks? I wonder how much time need to do that. Neutrinium 14:02, 30 November 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neutrinium ( talk • contribs)
i cant believe ive never seen thisbefore...
does this mean there is a wikipedia page for literally every single unique blue word found here? Snarevox ( talk) 00:12, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Avoid using wikilinks page. |
|
This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
I'd like to move this piece to a guideline so that when people think it's a stupid idea and try to refute it, I have some muscle to back it up with. Who's with me? - Omegatron (User:Omegatron) 20:15, Apr 3, 2005 (UTC)
Call me lazy but when I was reading this article i really wanted to know what spagetti_code was. I wished that there was some way of me clicking on the word that would easily tell me what that word meant, and then I could keep reading this article with more understanding. Instead, I stopped reading the article, came on this discussion to complain and will next go look up spagetti code the old fashioned way and probably never come back to this page. Wikilinks could have prevented the mild annoyance and subsequent distraction of this accidental reader. I (common un-initiated wiki browser) LIKE convenient meaningful wikilinks. If you have a problem with them, fix the problems. 68.41.80.161 ( talk) 02:12, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
This is supposed to be humor? I would suggest that this be marked for deletion. Who agrees? Stigmatella aurantiaca ( talk) 13:59, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
This is worth keeping. Why do you not think this is funny ? buffbills ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:44, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
I think it's funny. Keep it. It's also annoying; but keep it anyway. CohuttaBlue ( talk) 14:14, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
How could you do every world as a wikilinks? I wonder how much time need to do that. Neutrinium 14:02, 30 November 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neutrinium ( talk • contribs)
i cant believe ive never seen thisbefore...
does this mean there is a wikipedia page for literally every single unique blue word found here? Snarevox ( talk) 00:12, 24 October 2022 (UTC)