Where can I appeal this decision? It is being used unfairly to prevent any mention that the inscriptions exist on any article, not just the deleted one. The decision should rightfully have been MERGE not DELETE. Wikipedia is acting unfairly like it is the ENEMY of sourced information now, like it is AFRAID to let people hear anything about certain things and neutrally let them make up their own mind about anything without telling them "what to think", and I intend to take this to an appeal by following due process. This is a total abuse of admin power. Til Eulenspiegel ( talk) 21:04, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
- WP:DRV. But, Without a good basis for an overturn it's unlikely to go anywhere. IRWolfie- ( talk) 21:46, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Where can I appeal this decision? It is being used unfairly to prevent any mention that the inscriptions exist on any article, not just the deleted one. The decision should rightfully have been MERGE not DELETE. Wikipedia is acting unfairly like it is the ENEMY of sourced information now, like it is AFRAID to let people hear anything about certain things and neutrally let them make up their own mind about anything without telling them "what to think", and I intend to take this to an appeal by following due process. This is a total abuse of admin power. Til Eulenspiegel ( talk) 21:04, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
- WP:DRV. But, Without a good basis for an overturn it's unlikely to go anywhere. IRWolfie- ( talk) 21:46, 13 August 2012 (UTC)