Please keep the entry. Whether he is notable or not isn't an issue, or even the manner in which he chose to end his life. The fact that he went to this much effort point to something else few are willing to question is worthy of the entry remaining here.----C M Concepcion
You two need to comment at the actual AfD with your facts/reasoning, not on the 'discussion' page. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mitchell_Heisman jared - i'm sorry for your loss. Centerone ( talk) 07:43, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
"If my hypothesis is correct, this work will be repressed." - Mitchell Heisman
The final decision and the rather ludicrous reason for deleting this entry shows a greater similarity between wikipedia and trash news than I thought possible. Sad reasoning that seems to me to be a mask for the uncomfortable sensation that many people must have had when faced with the actions and work of this man. The first sentence above I think is true. His repression here is not entirely an overt repression, but instead comes from a distaste of some to examine the merits of his argument itself, which is brought violently into our field of vision. Why this man and his work are not represented in this encyclopedia while such undoubtably important folks as Lindsay Lohan are is troubling. Speaks poorly of Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.57.61.25 ( talk) 03:37, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
Don't Delete : It's just begining of a new Psychological era of “Nihilization”. Let people finish first the reading of "Suicide Note". Within next five years it will become a WHITE BOOK of Nihilicide. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.116.220.19 ( talk) 12:01, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
Unless you want your comments to be ignored. The discussion re: deletion is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mitchell Heisman. Fletcher ( talk) 21:50, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
This is why no one of importance takes wikipedia seriously. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.160.36.138 ( talk) 05:58, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Please keep the entry. Whether he is notable or not isn't an issue, or even the manner in which he chose to end his life. The fact that he went to this much effort point to something else few are willing to question is worthy of the entry remaining here.----C M Concepcion
You two need to comment at the actual AfD with your facts/reasoning, not on the 'discussion' page. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mitchell_Heisman jared - i'm sorry for your loss. Centerone ( talk) 07:43, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
"If my hypothesis is correct, this work will be repressed." - Mitchell Heisman
The final decision and the rather ludicrous reason for deleting this entry shows a greater similarity between wikipedia and trash news than I thought possible. Sad reasoning that seems to me to be a mask for the uncomfortable sensation that many people must have had when faced with the actions and work of this man. The first sentence above I think is true. His repression here is not entirely an overt repression, but instead comes from a distaste of some to examine the merits of his argument itself, which is brought violently into our field of vision. Why this man and his work are not represented in this encyclopedia while such undoubtably important folks as Lindsay Lohan are is troubling. Speaks poorly of Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.57.61.25 ( talk) 03:37, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
Don't Delete : It's just begining of a new Psychological era of “Nihilization”. Let people finish first the reading of "Suicide Note". Within next five years it will become a WHITE BOOK of Nihilicide. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.116.220.19 ( talk) 12:01, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
Unless you want your comments to be ignored. The discussion re: deletion is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mitchell Heisman. Fletcher ( talk) 21:50, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
This is why no one of importance takes wikipedia seriously. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.160.36.138 ( talk) 05:58, 5 October 2010 (UTC)