Leave it for people to delete an entire page/section of useful information in less than 2 days. I just love the fact that nothing has changed around here. The same mentality as usual: We don't want to fix what's broken so we're just going to delete it. I came here for the "full list" of cryptocurrencies, but I see it's has already been deleted. Way to go...this is no longer a full list. DragonFire1024 ( talk) 04:07, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- It was almost 3 weeks of discussion, but regardless, that's not the mentality - one of the main argumentents was that the majority of cryptocurrencies aren't significant enough to be included on the list. Most currencies listed were temporary fads or spam. Those that are significant are limited in number, which is why the currencies that are significant enough can and should be listed at the cryptocurrencies article. Not everything deserves to be listed on Wikipedia simply for existing. ~ Super Hamster Talk Contribs 04:32, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- The list is still in the article history. Some parts of it were basically spam that we're better off without, but I'd agree that some other parts of it should have been kept. 50.0.121.102 ( talk) 04:48, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
Leave it for people to delete an entire page/section of useful information in less than 2 days. I just love the fact that nothing has changed around here. The same mentality as usual: We don't want to fix what's broken so we're just going to delete it. I came here for the "full list" of cryptocurrencies, but I see it's has already been deleted. Way to go...this is no longer a full list. DragonFire1024 ( talk) 04:07, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- It was almost 3 weeks of discussion, but regardless, that's not the mentality - one of the main argumentents was that the majority of cryptocurrencies aren't significant enough to be included on the list. Most currencies listed were temporary fads or spam. Those that are significant are limited in number, which is why the currencies that are significant enough can and should be listed at the cryptocurrencies article. Not everything deserves to be listed on Wikipedia simply for existing. ~ Super Hamster Talk Contribs 04:32, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- The list is still in the article history. Some parts of it were basically spam that we're better off without, but I'd agree that some other parts of it should have been kept. 50.0.121.102 ( talk) 04:48, 15 January 2014 (UTC)