Dear Administrator, I would like to request to restore the article "Judicial Shamanism". The discussion presented here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Judicial_Shamanism is completely uncompetent. The concept of "judicial shamanism" is used by the following people: 1) Article "In the fortress of double standards" ("Dvygubu standartu citadeleje") of President Rolandas Paksas of Lithuania explicitely mentions the concept of "judicial shamanism" http://www.ivaizdis.lt/zinpr_det.php?id=9827 and http://www.paksas.eu/news.php?strid=1577&id=3139
2) The concept of "judicial shamanism" is explicitely mentioned at the official website of the Lithuanian Constitutional Court http://www.lrkt.lt/APublikacijos_20080320b.html
3) There is an article "Theory of Judicial Shamanism" of Stanislovas Tomas published by the WORLD CONGRESS OF PHILOSOHPY OF LAW (that took place in 2005) http://direct.bl.uk/bld/PlaceOrder.do?UIN=211909788&ETOC=RN&from=searchengine He also has a number of other scientific publications on the subject, and is a law teacher.
4) The concept of "judicial shamanism" is also in use in the works of Rafael Prince from the University of Sao Paolo http://www.buscalegis.ufsc.br/revistas/index.php/buscalegis/article/viewFile/33054/32234
5) There is article "Shamans, Law and Logic" of professor Rolandas Pavilionis http://www.vgtu.lt/upload/mc/lm_73kn_3.pdf and http://www.skrastas.lt/?rub=1065924817&data=2006-01-24
6) The conception of judicial shamanism is mentioned at page 42 of Sergey Shirokogoroff called "Phsychomental Complex of the Tungus".
7) The conception of judicial shamanism is mentioned at page 48 of "Le systeme des objets" by Jean Baudrillard.
8) The deletion is not unanimous, since as we see in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Judicial_Shamanism - a user tried to protest.
9) there is a requirement to have a discussion on deletion for a sufficiently long period. The discussion started on 14 January 2010 and the article was deleted on 21 January - THAT IS SEVEN DAYS ONLY - this is an insufficiently short period and violation of wiki-rules.
This is why the article shall be restored.
- The correct place to raise your concerns is deletion review. 7 days, by the way, is the standard time period for deletion discussions here. Ged UK 18:47, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
Dear Administrator, I would like to request to restore the article "Judicial Shamanism". The discussion presented here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Judicial_Shamanism is completely uncompetent. The concept of "judicial shamanism" is used by the following people: 1) Article "In the fortress of double standards" ("Dvygubu standartu citadeleje") of President Rolandas Paksas of Lithuania explicitely mentions the concept of "judicial shamanism" http://www.ivaizdis.lt/zinpr_det.php?id=9827 and http://www.paksas.eu/news.php?strid=1577&id=3139
2) The concept of "judicial shamanism" is explicitely mentioned at the official website of the Lithuanian Constitutional Court http://www.lrkt.lt/APublikacijos_20080320b.html
3) There is an article "Theory of Judicial Shamanism" of Stanislovas Tomas published by the WORLD CONGRESS OF PHILOSOHPY OF LAW (that took place in 2005) http://direct.bl.uk/bld/PlaceOrder.do?UIN=211909788&ETOC=RN&from=searchengine He also has a number of other scientific publications on the subject, and is a law teacher.
4) The concept of "judicial shamanism" is also in use in the works of Rafael Prince from the University of Sao Paolo http://www.buscalegis.ufsc.br/revistas/index.php/buscalegis/article/viewFile/33054/32234
5) There is article "Shamans, Law and Logic" of professor Rolandas Pavilionis http://www.vgtu.lt/upload/mc/lm_73kn_3.pdf and http://www.skrastas.lt/?rub=1065924817&data=2006-01-24
6) The conception of judicial shamanism is mentioned at page 42 of Sergey Shirokogoroff called "Phsychomental Complex of the Tungus".
7) The conception of judicial shamanism is mentioned at page 48 of "Le systeme des objets" by Jean Baudrillard.
8) The deletion is not unanimous, since as we see in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Judicial_Shamanism - a user tried to protest.
9) there is a requirement to have a discussion on deletion for a sufficiently long period. The discussion started on 14 January 2010 and the article was deleted on 21 January - THAT IS SEVEN DAYS ONLY - this is an insufficiently short period and violation of wiki-rules.
This is why the article shall be restored.
- The correct place to raise your concerns is deletion review. 7 days, by the way, is the standard time period for deletion discussions here. Ged UK 18:47, 30 January 2010 (UTC)