Wow, Z-Man is watching this page like a hawk! Twenty seconds after voting I have been deemed to not count and my vote removed... Removing dissenting opinions from your own vote... this is why I love Wikipedia! All rules are completely arbitrary based on who deems their own agendas need enforcing. 68.186.60.2 ( talk) 01:34, 21 November 2007 (UTC) reply

• I have to agree, i was watching this page myself after making my vote and saw his come and go very quickly. His opinion may be strongly against yours, but it does not make his opinion invalid. Qapf ( talk) 01:40, 21 November 2007 (UTC) reply
  • I would hardly call this a valid comment. Mr. Z-man 01:59, 21 November 2007 (UTC) reply
    • The other thing I love is the fact that all but two dissenting votes have been commented on by Z-Man as well, basically restating his original vote. If you can't delete 'em, at least say SOMETHING, right? 68.186.60.2 ( talk) 07:08, 22 November 2007 (UTC) reply
      • Excuse me for discussing. I find your comments quite rude. Please assume good faith. Mr. Z-man 07:12, 22 November 2007 (UTC) reply

I would like to have this page reinstated. You could move the guitar incompatibility section of the rockband page here. It's factual information condensed in a nice table and there is obviously a big demand for this page. The voting outcome was 5/18 in favour of keeping the page, yet it was deleted!-- Beau ( talk) 14:55, 4 January 2008 (UTC) reply

I say keep. It should not have been deleted. -- 207.135.146.151 ( talk) 06:19, 27 January 2008 (UTC) reply