This is the talk page for discussing a candidate for election to the Arbitration Committee. | |||
---|---|---|---|
|
|||
|
Barkeep49 is one of the Wikipedians that I admire most on this project. He is responsible, thoughtful, and careful. He handles difficult situations with aplomb and willingly does the right thing over the easy thing every time. He hears out folks who disagree with him, and when he realizes he's wrong he changes his mind immediately. He is a skilled mediator; when you talk with him he makes you feel heard. He never speaks before thinking and that's why I trust him implicitly. I have nothing but good things to say about him, and I hope everyone joins me in voting for him. Best, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 06:26, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Last year, I was one of the people who persuaded Barkeep49 to run; I thought they were a very good candidate then, and after a year of further admin experience, I am even more convinced of it. Risker ( talk) 20:05, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
I put a Costco Bear in barkeep49's sandbox and he deleted the sandbox! That's the only reason I can think of for someone not supporting his candidacy. He would be an excellent arbitrator. Natureium ( talk) 20:09, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
As above, Barkeep is an absolute joy to have around. Every time he participates in a discussion, it's guaranteed to be a thoughtful, considered, and valuable contribution. Never an overharsh word, he's got a perfect temperament for ArbCom. He's rapidly benefited every area he's worked in, and embarrasses amazes me with how quick he learns. He's just as quick to recognize, apologize, and learn from a mistake. Ideal Committee member. ~ Amory (
u •
t •
c) 12:07, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
Having gotten to know Barkeep49 fairly well, it's completely obvious to me that he is going to be an outstanding addition to the arbitration team. Over the past couple of years, we've all watched him become one of the most trusted and respected voices on the project. He is a skilled mediator, a brilliant evaluator of consensus, and a natural leader. I don't know that I know of anyone who cares about the project more than he does, and I'm thrilled that he's decided to run for the committee. This is an easy choice for me. CThomas3 ( talk) 20:29, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
I have nothing much to express toward this user, but he will surely do good as far as what I have seen with him is concern. An@ss_koko (speak up) 10:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
I left Barkeep a good luck message on their talkpage: [1], and they have asked me to comment here. I feel that Barkeep49 would be an asset to the Committee if elected, as they have demonstrated a thoughtful and balanced approach in their dealings around the project. SilkTork ( talk) 15:20, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
This is the talk page for discussing a candidate for election to the Arbitration Committee. | |||
---|---|---|---|
|
|||
|
Barkeep49 is one of the Wikipedians that I admire most on this project. He is responsible, thoughtful, and careful. He handles difficult situations with aplomb and willingly does the right thing over the easy thing every time. He hears out folks who disagree with him, and when he realizes he's wrong he changes his mind immediately. He is a skilled mediator; when you talk with him he makes you feel heard. He never speaks before thinking and that's why I trust him implicitly. I have nothing but good things to say about him, and I hope everyone joins me in voting for him. Best, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 06:26, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Last year, I was one of the people who persuaded Barkeep49 to run; I thought they were a very good candidate then, and after a year of further admin experience, I am even more convinced of it. Risker ( talk) 20:05, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
I put a Costco Bear in barkeep49's sandbox and he deleted the sandbox! That's the only reason I can think of for someone not supporting his candidacy. He would be an excellent arbitrator. Natureium ( talk) 20:09, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
As above, Barkeep is an absolute joy to have around. Every time he participates in a discussion, it's guaranteed to be a thoughtful, considered, and valuable contribution. Never an overharsh word, he's got a perfect temperament for ArbCom. He's rapidly benefited every area he's worked in, and embarrasses amazes me with how quick he learns. He's just as quick to recognize, apologize, and learn from a mistake. Ideal Committee member. ~ Amory (
u •
t •
c) 12:07, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
Having gotten to know Barkeep49 fairly well, it's completely obvious to me that he is going to be an outstanding addition to the arbitration team. Over the past couple of years, we've all watched him become one of the most trusted and respected voices on the project. He is a skilled mediator, a brilliant evaluator of consensus, and a natural leader. I don't know that I know of anyone who cares about the project more than he does, and I'm thrilled that he's decided to run for the committee. This is an easy choice for me. CThomas3 ( talk) 20:29, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
I have nothing much to express toward this user, but he will surely do good as far as what I have seen with him is concern. An@ss_koko (speak up) 10:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
I left Barkeep a good luck message on their talkpage: [1], and they have asked me to comment here. I feel that Barkeep49 would be an asset to the Committee if elected, as they have demonstrated a thoughtful and balanced approach in their dealings around the project. SilkTork ( talk) 15:20, 25 November 2020 (UTC)