Is there any point in continuing this now that Fred is not an admin? -- Tarage ( talk) 21:30, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
- I think the election coordinators have stated that they do not think this should be withdrawn/closed. While the community has traditionally elected only admin to serve on ArbCom it is not an actual requirement. Best,
Barkeep49 (
talk)
21:38, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
- Yes there have been non admins who have tried in the past. They failed, but it's not an explicit requirement even if many feel it's an implicit one and so most don't bother. Nil Einne ( talk) 08:41, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- Tarage, Fred is still a standing candidate. After deliberating with commissioners, that is what came to an agreement on. — CYBERPOWER ( Chat) 23:39, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
The electoral commission has discussed the issue of Fred Bauder's nomination and agrees that he is to appear on the voting ballot. After discussing the the definition of being in good standing, the committee has opted to consider good standing as "to not be subjects of an active block". Fred's block was lifted before the nomination period was closed, thus his nomination has been restored. Fred Bauder is also reminded that unless the questions outright attack or out users, questions cannot be moved or removed from the candidate's questions page.— CYBERPOWER ( Around) 01:46, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
In my edit history, the date of my edit asking a question to Fred is strikken through. What does that mean? @ Cyberpower678: can you help me understand? PizzaMan ( talk · contribs) PizzaMan ♨♨♨ 05:09, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- It means some content from the page has been removed, and all revisions which contained it have been surpressed by
WP:Oversight. It is nothing to do with your question itself.
Boing! said Zebedee (
talk)
07:39, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you for explaining, Boing! said Zebedee. I hope things wil stay calm here from now on (and that perhaps my question could be a small contribution to that). PizzaMan ♨♨♨ 21:35, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Is there any point in continuing this now that Fred is not an admin? -- Tarage ( talk) 21:30, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
- I think the election coordinators have stated that they do not think this should be withdrawn/closed. While the community has traditionally elected only admin to serve on ArbCom it is not an actual requirement. Best,
Barkeep49 (
talk)
21:38, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
- Yes there have been non admins who have tried in the past. They failed, but it's not an explicit requirement even if many feel it's an implicit one and so most don't bother. Nil Einne ( talk) 08:41, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- Tarage, Fred is still a standing candidate. After deliberating with commissioners, that is what came to an agreement on. — CYBERPOWER ( Chat) 23:39, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
The electoral commission has discussed the issue of Fred Bauder's nomination and agrees that he is to appear on the voting ballot. After discussing the the definition of being in good standing, the committee has opted to consider good standing as "to not be subjects of an active block". Fred's block was lifted before the nomination period was closed, thus his nomination has been restored. Fred Bauder is also reminded that unless the questions outright attack or out users, questions cannot be moved or removed from the candidate's questions page.— CYBERPOWER ( Around) 01:46, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
In my edit history, the date of my edit asking a question to Fred is strikken through. What does that mean? @ Cyberpower678: can you help me understand? PizzaMan ( talk · contribs) PizzaMan ♨♨♨ 05:09, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- It means some content from the page has been removed, and all revisions which contained it have been surpressed by
WP:Oversight. It is nothing to do with your question itself.
Boing! said Zebedee (
talk)
07:39, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you for explaining, Boing! said Zebedee. I hope things wil stay calm here from now on (and that perhaps my question could be a small contribution to that). PizzaMan ♨♨♨ 21:35, 14 November 2018 (UTC)