Sorry, I have a problem with a "no diffs" policy. Arbitrators need to be comfortable with diffs. Evidence is important. --
Elonka02:01, 23 November 2013 (UTC)reply
No problem Elonka. I prefer to see how a candidate thinks and assume that any experienced editor will be able to provide diffs in an actual arbitration proceeding. But, we are all different and thank goodness for that! If this is a deciding issue for you, I respect that. --
regentspark (
comment)
01:52, 25 November 2013 (UTC)reply
Hi Regents. I wish you would reconsider. If you carry that practice over to the Arb Committee, your communications would deprive readers of a deeper understanding. I think that diffs are simply a communication tool -- but if we had a judge who refused to cite other cases, that would be a judge whose work would be less helpful than the normal judge.--
Epeefleche (
talk)
03:36, 26 November 2013 (UTC)reply
Sorry, I have a problem with a "no diffs" policy. Arbitrators need to be comfortable with diffs. Evidence is important. --
Elonka02:01, 23 November 2013 (UTC)reply
No problem Elonka. I prefer to see how a candidate thinks and assume that any experienced editor will be able to provide diffs in an actual arbitration proceeding. But, we are all different and thank goodness for that! If this is a deciding issue for you, I respect that. --
regentspark (
comment)
01:52, 25 November 2013 (UTC)reply
Hi Regents. I wish you would reconsider. If you carry that practice over to the Arb Committee, your communications would deprive readers of a deeper understanding. I think that diffs are simply a communication tool -- but if we had a judge who refused to cite other cases, that would be a judge whose work would be less helpful than the normal judge.--
Epeefleche (
talk)
03:36, 26 November 2013 (UTC)reply