 | This is an
essay. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been
thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. |
Here are some words in an intro to an article, that tend to unbalance the intro to the point that it becomes non- NPOV. You can use these in the conditions listed, but please, try to avoid using more than two of them in any given intro:
- "Self-proclaimed": As long as only the subject of the article (or the subject of this modifier) is proclaiming that s/he/it is whatever, you're good; if not, well, you're misusing "Self-proclaimed".
- "Fraudulent": In articles about financial and legal matters, if you can provide cites, kosher; anywhere else, and especially without cites, you're well into the "not good" zone.
- "Dishonest": No. Just, no.
- "Supernatural": As applied to the article's subject, not kosher.
- "Controversial": In the body of the paragraph, it is OK, not in the header.
(Feel free to edit this; it is a preliminary draft, and hopes to become much better.)
| This is an
essay. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been
thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. |
Here are some words in an intro to an article, that tend to unbalance the intro to the point that it becomes non- NPOV. You can use these in the conditions listed, but please, try to avoid using more than two of them in any given intro:
- "Self-proclaimed": As long as only the subject of the article (or the subject of this modifier) is proclaiming that s/he/it is whatever, you're good; if not, well, you're misusing "Self-proclaimed".
- "Fraudulent": In articles about financial and legal matters, if you can provide cites, kosher; anywhere else, and especially without cites, you're well into the "not good" zone.
- "Dishonest": No. Just, no.
- "Supernatural": As applied to the article's subject, not kosher.
- "Controversial": In the body of the paragraph, it is OK, not in the header.
(Feel free to edit this; it is a preliminary draft, and hopes to become much better.)