Bloggers' Top-Cited Wikipedia 2006 Entries: Nielson BuzzMetrics (as in, Nielson TV ratings...?)
report on the most linked-to Wikipedia articles among bloggers. The top 3 were, in order:
"Who knew shoplifting techniques could be found on Wikipedia? Every possible shoplifting method, from "bag switching" to "milkshake subterfuge" can be found here."
What other articles are "instructive" on not-so-savory topics? List of racial slurs, others.
WikiCast has launched: podcast based loosely around Wikipedia content and made by Wikipedians. See
Category:Wikicast material on Commons. (?)
Wiki industry
Citizendium update:
First live article on Biology:
Criteria, significance?
Compare with Wikipedia version?
Immaturity of approval process and/or templates? See image to right: contradiction, and redundant statement. Needs significant clarification before release.
Draft pages are now users, such as
this one, but don't have a namespace of their own.
Updated statistics:
659 "CZ:Live" articles
1 approved, 1 up for approval (
this thread fleshes out the approval process a little)
136 editors, 431 registered users (is this the number of humans, or usernames?)
3-400 edits/day
Leading workgroup, Health Sciences, has 21 editors (the blog post is already out of date) and 6 authors
Most viewed pages at Citizendium:
Main Page [5,574]
Biology [1,338]
Talk:Biology [912]
Chiropractic [902]
Category:CZ Live [631]
Citizendium Pilot:Discipline Workgroups [604]
Barbara McClintock [319]
Citizendium Pilot:High priority articles for pilot [278]
Citizendium Pilot:Notice Board [256]
User talk:Larry Sanger [234]
Wikia
Openhosting.com
From the Signpost and Wikizine
[tEmplate] - On most projects, the first letter of an article title starts with a capital letter, but some subjects are correctly spelled with a starting lowercase letter. There is a way around this by using a special template that changes the appearance of the title with JavaScript.
TIME Magazine has named "You" the person of the year. You as in Youtube, user generated content, of which Wikipedia is one of the major players.
"It's about the cosmic compendium of knowledge Wikipedia and the million-channel people's network YouTube and the online metropolis MySpace. It's about the many wresting power from the few and helping one another for nothing and how that will not only change the world, but also change the way the world changes."
If anybody provides some particularly interesting feedback, or one of us has anything cool to say, we'd say it here. Who knows? It might be interesting, if we ever have anything to say.
Several comments about recording quality - yeah, tough to get right. But we'll try Levelator this time.
We seriously need better microphones, for MessedRocker in particular. Shall we all chip in a few bucks?
Daveydweeb (chat/review!) 07:18, 15 December 2006 (UTC)reply
From the WP:WWPC talk page: We need to talk less about feedback. Obviously, we don't need to talk about this point for too long. ;)
The World According to Wikipedia
This would be a quick, light-hearted discussion of any particularly funny page-rankings we see on
The Top 100 pages at Wikipedia. There's at least two or three minutes' worth of humour in that.
Bloggers' Top-Cited Wikipedia 2006 Entries: Nielson BuzzMetrics (as in, Nielson TV ratings...?)
report on the most linked-to Wikipedia articles among bloggers. The top 3 were, in order:
"Who knew shoplifting techniques could be found on Wikipedia? Every possible shoplifting method, from "bag switching" to "milkshake subterfuge" can be found here."
What other articles are "instructive" on not-so-savory topics? List of racial slurs, others.
WikiCast has launched: podcast based loosely around Wikipedia content and made by Wikipedians. See
Category:Wikicast material on Commons. (?)
Wiki industry
Citizendium update:
First live article on Biology:
Criteria, significance?
Compare with Wikipedia version?
Immaturity of approval process and/or templates? See image to right: contradiction, and redundant statement. Needs significant clarification before release.
Draft pages are now users, such as
this one, but don't have a namespace of their own.
Updated statistics:
659 "CZ:Live" articles
1 approved, 1 up for approval (
this thread fleshes out the approval process a little)
136 editors, 431 registered users (is this the number of humans, or usernames?)
3-400 edits/day
Leading workgroup, Health Sciences, has 21 editors (the blog post is already out of date) and 6 authors
Most viewed pages at Citizendium:
Main Page [5,574]
Biology [1,338]
Talk:Biology [912]
Chiropractic [902]
Category:CZ Live [631]
Citizendium Pilot:Discipline Workgroups [604]
Barbara McClintock [319]
Citizendium Pilot:High priority articles for pilot [278]
Citizendium Pilot:Notice Board [256]
User talk:Larry Sanger [234]
Wikia
Openhosting.com
From the Signpost and Wikizine
[tEmplate] - On most projects, the first letter of an article title starts with a capital letter, but some subjects are correctly spelled with a starting lowercase letter. There is a way around this by using a special template that changes the appearance of the title with JavaScript.
TIME Magazine has named "You" the person of the year. You as in Youtube, user generated content, of which Wikipedia is one of the major players.
"It's about the cosmic compendium of knowledge Wikipedia and the million-channel people's network YouTube and the online metropolis MySpace. It's about the many wresting power from the few and helping one another for nothing and how that will not only change the world, but also change the way the world changes."
If anybody provides some particularly interesting feedback, or one of us has anything cool to say, we'd say it here. Who knows? It might be interesting, if we ever have anything to say.
Several comments about recording quality - yeah, tough to get right. But we'll try Levelator this time.
We seriously need better microphones, for MessedRocker in particular. Shall we all chip in a few bucks?
Daveydweeb (chat/review!) 07:18, 15 December 2006 (UTC)reply
From the WP:WWPC talk page: We need to talk less about feedback. Obviously, we don't need to talk about this point for too long. ;)
The World According to Wikipedia
This would be a quick, light-hearted discussion of any particularly funny page-rankings we see on
The Top 100 pages at Wikipedia. There's at least two or three minutes' worth of humour in that.