In class - Assignment overview

• Overview of the course
• Introduction to how Wikipedia will be used in the course
• Understanding Wikipedia as a community, we'll discuss its expectations and etiquette.

Assignment - Editing basics

• Basics of editing
• Anatomy of Wikipedia articles, what makes a good article, how to distinguish between good and bad articles
• Collaborating and engaging with the Wiki editing community
• Tips on finding the best articles to work on for class assignments

Handouts: Handout: Editing Wikipedia, Using Talk Pages, Evaluating Wikipedia

Assignment - Practice the basics

• Create an account and then complete assigned training modules. During this training, you will make edits in a sandbox and learn the basic rules of Wikipedia.
• Create a User page.
• To practice editing and communicating on Wikipedia, introduce yourself to another student on their user talk page.
• Explore topics related to your topic area to get a feel for how Wikipedia is organized. What areas seem to be missing? As you explore, make a mental note of articles that seem like good candidates for improvement.

Milestones

All students have Wikipedia user accounts and are listed on the course page.

Assignment - Explore topics/Add to an article

• List 3 to 5 course-relevant Wikipedia articles that need work and that you might like to work on to the course discussion forum. Include each potential Wikipedia article as a new forum topic. For each article, provide a brief description of what you think is needed. Look through other students' suggestions to find other articles you might work on and to identify an editing partner.
• Add 1–2 sentences of new information, backed up with a citation to an appropriate source, to a Wikipedia article related to the class. There are two ways to do this -- either start with a scientific article and add the citation to a relevant Wikipedia article or start with a Wikipedia article and then find a relevant citation in the scientific literature
  • Starting with a scientific article: Look through articles from Current Directions in Psychological Science or a similar reference source for interesting articles relevant to the course published in the last 5-7 years. Add one idea or fact from this research to a relevant article in Wikipedia, preferably one on which you'd want to work. Be sure to include an inline citation to the original source. One way to find a Wikipedia article for this new information is to identify some keywords from the title or abstract of the Current Directions' article and conduct an advanced Google search of the form keywords site:Wikipedia.org, , which will restrict the search to the wikipedia.org domain. For example, a Google search on "person perception thin slices site:wikipedia.org" returns articles on "interpersonal perception", "Blink (book)" "Nalini Ambady" and "Thin-slicing", all of which are relevant to this topic. 
  • Starting with a Wikipedia article: Alternatively, you could identify a Wikipedia article and then conduct a Google scholar or Psych Info search on that topic to find relevant scholarly articles. For example, to find relevant, recent scholarly articles relevant to the  Wikipedia article on thin slicing, you could conduct a Google Scholar search, with the key words "person perception" and "thin slice" and a custom date range from 2008-2016.
• Handouts:
  

Choosing an article
Citing Sources
Avoiding Plagiarism

Milestones

• Select an article to work on and partner to work with. Add your topic on the course page. In addition, include your name, partner's name, sandbox and article URL on this spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1XsFv5K_zdDMofU-sv4qW6RiZbwRNO3Zxq2b97IF7ZAQ/edit#gid=0
• Schedule a time to meet with Professor Kraut during the week of during the week of Oct 1.  Email Ja'Ron Pitts < andrew.cmu.edu jpittsandrew.cmu.edu> to make your appointment.

Milestones

• Meet with Professor Kraut to get your article approved and discuss your plans for improving it.

Assignment - Initial bibliography

• Compile a bibliography of relevant, reliable sources and post it to the talk page of the article you are working on. Begin reading the sources. Make sure to check in on the talk page (or watchlist) to see if anyone has advice on your bibliography.
• If you are improving an existing article, create a detailed outline reflecting your proposed changes, and post this outline along with a brief description of your plans, on the article’s talk page for community feedback. Make sure to check back on the talk page often and engage with any responses.
• If you are starting a new article, write a 3–4 paragraph summary version of your article—with citations—in your Wikipedia sandbox. 

Milestones

All students have started editing articles or drafts on Wikipedia.

Assignment - Move articles to mainspace

• Move your sandbox articles and edits into main space. 
  • If you are expanding an existing article, copy your edits into the article. If you are making many small edits, save after each edit before you make the next one. As a minimum, save after you have made changes in a single paragraph. Do NOT paste over the entire existing article, or large sections of the existing article, because this will make it difficult for community members to understood what you have done.  As a result, they are likely to delete all your changes.
• A general reminder: Don't panic if your contribution disappears, and don't try to force it back in.
  • Check to see if there is an explanation of the edit on the article's talk page. If not, (politely) ask why it was removed.
  • Contact your instructor or Wikipedia Content Expert and let them know.
  • If you are creating a new article, do NOT copy and paste your text, or there will be no record of your work history. Follow the instructions in the "Moving out of your sandbox" handout.

Assignment - Choose articles to peer review

• Select two classmates’ articles that you will peer review and copyedit. Add your names next to the articles you will peer review in this spreadsheet. (You don’t need to start reviewing yet.)

Assignment - Complete first draft

• If you are revising an existing article, continue to improve the article by rewriting and/or adding new material.
• If you are creating a new article, expand your article into a complete first draft.

Milestones

Students have posted their first, complete round of edits to their article, so that other classmates and the Wikipedia community can review their improvements.

Assignment - Peer review and copyedit

• Peer review two of your classmates’ articles. Leave suggestions on the articles' talk pages.
• Copy-edit the two reviewed articles.

Milestones

Every student has finished reviewing their assigned articles, making sure that every article has been reviewed.

Assignment - Address peer review suggestions

• Make edits to your article based on peers’ feedback. If you disagree with a suggestion, use the artical talk pages to politely discuss and come to a consensus on your edit.

Assignment - Continue improving articles

• Return to your classmates' articles you previously reviewed, and provide more suggestions for further improvement. If there is a disagreement, suggest a compromise.
• Do additional research and writing to further improve to your article, based on your classmates' suggestions and any additional areas for improvement you can identify.

Assignment - Final article

• Add final touches to your Wikipedia article.  Proofread.
• Submit the article and the essay in the course homework forum

Assignment - Reflective essay

• Write and turn in a reflective essay  (5-10 pages) on your Wikipedia contributions. The essay should have two components. Each team will submit a single reflective essay.
• The first section should describe and document what you actually did for the assignment and provide a rationale for your changes. Here you should include a URL to the article you worked on and provide an overview of the work you did.  What were your improvement goals. Why these goals?. What types of contributions did you make?  How did you reorganize the page, if you did.  What areas in the article did you expand?  What new material did you add?  What is your assessment of the extent of the improvements you made -- e.g., small updates or corrections ,  adding new section, major reorganization, etc.
• The second section should describe what you learned about how an online community operates by participating in the assignment.  What kind of interaction did you have with the Wikipedia infrastructure (e.g., policies and guidelines) or with members of the community? What does Wikipedia do to make it easy or hard for newcomers to participate?  How could Wikipedia more effectively take advantage of motivated volunteers like you?

Milestones