From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

209.235.156.0/24

209.235.156.0/24 · contribs · block · log · stalk · Robtex · whois · Google

Reason: We've been getting a lot of nasty stuff from this range. It seems like it might be a proxy of some sort. Last time something from this range came up, one of the abusers of the range deleted it, which is the only reason I thought "proxy". -- jpgordon ::==( o ) 22:08, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

I haven't been able to find anything conclusive on this range to date, but having looked at it before I can confirm two things: 1) it's been used by users who have been jumping between confirmed open CGI proxies, and 2) most Google results for these IPs show they have been web servers recently. It seems Hostopia and INFB route their traffic around a fair bit through closed proxies. Until something more concrete turns up, I would think a checkuser block would be more maintainable than an open proxy block, which is something I endorse btw. -- zzuuzz (talk) 10:58, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
{{ inconclusive}}.  Likely. Checkuserblocked. -- zzuuzz (talk) 14:59, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

212.247.11.156

212.247.11.156 · talk · contribs · block · log · stalk · Robtex · whois · Google · ipcheck · HTTP · geo · rangeblocks · spur · shodan

Seems like many persons are using this IP. Possible proxy? Highest Heights ( talk) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

{{ inconclusive}} Q T C 07:01, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

209.235.156.0/24

209.235.156.0/24 · contribs · block · log · stalk · Robtex · whois · Google

Reason: We've been getting a lot of nasty stuff from this range. It seems like it might be a proxy of some sort. Last time something from this range came up, one of the abusers of the range deleted it, which is the only reason I thought "proxy". -- jpgordon ::==( o ) 22:08, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

I haven't been able to find anything conclusive on this range to date, but having looked at it before I can confirm two things: 1) it's been used by users who have been jumping between confirmed open CGI proxies, and 2) most Google results for these IPs show they have been web servers recently. It seems Hostopia and INFB route their traffic around a fair bit through closed proxies. Until something more concrete turns up, I would think a checkuser block would be more maintainable than an open proxy block, which is something I endorse btw. -- zzuuzz (talk) 10:58, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
{{ inconclusive}}.  Likely. Checkuserblocked. -- zzuuzz (talk) 14:59, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

212.247.11.156

212.247.11.156 · talk · contribs · block · log · stalk · Robtex · whois · Google · ipcheck · HTTP · geo · rangeblocks · spur · shodan

Seems like many persons are using this IP. Possible proxy? Highest Heights ( talk) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

{{ inconclusive}} Q T C 07:01, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook