This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current main page. |
Reason: A pattern of attacks on User talk:Diannaa, all coming from different IP ranges. Most edits have been oversighted. Self-declared vandal: [1] All the IPs are in different geographic locations, so this is obviously some proxying service. -- Petri Krohn ( talk) 00:25, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
I've anonblocked this IP for six months per the result of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/123.236.241.218. When you open up http://123.236.241.218 it presents a login prompt, so it is functioning as a web server at least to that degree. My question is whether this IP should be hardblocked. Googling the IP does not show it on any proxy lists. I got no results from a reverse DNS. Thanks, EdJohnston ( talk) 01:33, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Reason: Discovered open port 80/tcp on 116.255.25.57 . Can we confirm if this is or is not a proxy. Thanks!-- Gordonrox24 | Talk 01:37, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current main page. |
Reason: A pattern of attacks on User talk:Diannaa, all coming from different IP ranges. Most edits have been oversighted. Self-declared vandal: [1] All the IPs are in different geographic locations, so this is obviously some proxying service. -- Petri Krohn ( talk) 00:25, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
I've anonblocked this IP for six months per the result of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/123.236.241.218. When you open up http://123.236.241.218 it presents a login prompt, so it is functioning as a web server at least to that degree. My question is whether this IP should be hardblocked. Googling the IP does not show it on any proxy lists. I got no results from a reverse DNS. Thanks, EdJohnston ( talk) 01:33, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Reason: Discovered open port 80/tcp on 116.255.25.57 . Can we confirm if this is or is not a proxy. Thanks!-- Gordonrox24 | Talk 01:37, 14 March 2011 (UTC)