GT Advance Championship Racing

I've nominated this article for GA status after I wasted an entire day redoing it. Are there any more improvements before the GA review that I should take note of? And is there anything else that could improve the article significantly (or only a bit -- any advice would be wonderful). Lastly -- should I cite the lead as much as I have? -- Nomader ^{( Talk)} 03:58, 16 February 2008 (UTC) reply

Well, I could answer the question on the GA review, but- no, you don't really have to cite the lead, since the assumption is you're talking about the info in the article later, where it will be cited. The exception is if you used quotes, like "IGN said the game doth sucketh.[cite]" or information which is likely to be contentious, like sales numbers. But extra sourcing never hurt anyone. :) David Fuchs ^{( talk)} 21:09, 21 February 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks a bunch -- but, I don't feel like removing all those sources from the lead (already so many...), so for now at least, they'll stay. I guess this makes it about it for this peer review... I'll move any more comments I have about it to the GA review. -- Nomader ^{( Talk)} 23:28, 21 February 2008 (UTC) reply