I'd like to help standardize'''' and expand Wikipedia's collection of U.S. Supreme Court cases and U.S. Supreme Court Justices.
I'm thinking that each case page should contain the following headings: .
The page for each Justice should contain:
Too much electronic law related information is behind closed doors on paid services - Westlaw and Lexis. This could be a valuable resource for students and laypeople. Please post below if you are interested in joining me.
-- PrinceValium 04:27, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Should we use vs. or v.; examples see below
I should add "Lower Court History" as one of the topics above. This should be brief, however, especially for older cases.
The following pages are done extremely well and would serve as a good example of "analysis" - NPOV explanation of the legal, social, and cultural impact of the case.
However, these are few and far between, and they would all benefit from standardized section headings. -- PrinceValium 12:14, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC)
I'd like to help standardize'''' and expand Wikipedia's collection of U.S. Supreme Court cases and U.S. Supreme Court Justices.
I'm thinking that each case page should contain the following headings: .
The page for each Justice should contain:
Too much electronic law related information is behind closed doors on paid services - Westlaw and Lexis. This could be a valuable resource for students and laypeople. Please post below if you are interested in joining me.
-- PrinceValium 04:27, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Should we use vs. or v.; examples see below
I should add "Lower Court History" as one of the topics above. This should be brief, however, especially for older cases.
The following pages are done extremely well and would serve as a good example of "analysis" - NPOV explanation of the legal, social, and cultural impact of the case.
However, these are few and far between, and they would all benefit from standardized section headings. -- PrinceValium 12:14, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC)