This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current main page. |
The result of the debate was create as revised.
Category:Cyprinidae stubs currently has a backlog of 812 pages, and not enough subcategories. Therefore, I propose to reorganize it like this:
Current structure:
New structure:
This would involve creating the following categories/templates:
And deleting these categories/templates:
Andumé ( talk) 20:07, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Hi there. The
Category:Ranunculaceae is large, with
over 250 existing stubs. So I propose the creation of
Category:Ranunculaceae stubs. Best, --
Fadesga (
talk) 22:02, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Hi there. The
Category:Boraginaceae is large, with
over 300 existing stubs. So I propose the creation of
Category:Boraginaceae stubs. Best, --
Fadesga (
talk) 21:28, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
The result of the debate was created.
I propose creation of the following:
The result of the debate was created.
I was sorting Ukraine stubs lately and noticed several military-related templates that seem redundant, all uperged to
Category:Ukraine stubs. I can't find any reference to these being proposed, but I'm certainly willing to give them a chance.
I propose Category:Ukrainian military stubs to contain {{ Ukraine-mil-stub}}, as well as an upmerged {{ Ukraine-mil-unit-stub}} (which would be assigned to all the articles currently wearing Ukrainian-navy-stub, Ukraine-minesweeper-stub, UGF-stub, USG-stub, and UAF-stub, after which I would propose those unused templates for deletion). Her Pegship ( ?) 21:55, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
I've done some preliminary analysis leading up to this request, which appears in two sections of
Category talk:Japanese dam stubs: "Stub sorting - sub-categories - some statistics" and "Stub sorting - sub-categories - using PetScan". I propose creating the following stub templates+categories with the prospective article populations listed below.
The numbers are not 100% aligned between the PetScan results and the original stub cat article count, but they are within a dozen or so articles of each other. Creation and re-stubbing along these lines would effectively de-populate Category:Japanese dam stubs with its ~1,600 stubs into sub-cats of between about 140 and 350 articles each. Thanks for your review and approval. --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me) 20:15, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Hi there. The
Category:Alismatales is very large, with
over 100 existing stubs (not yet assigned to a subcategory), in turn part of
over 200 stub-category articles. So I propose the creation of
Category:Alismatales stubs. Best, --
Fadesga (
talk) 19:26, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
The following templates from
Category:European politician stubs have over 60 transclusions:
Cheers. Curbon7 ( talk) 05:13, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Upmerged stub template under
Category:European airline stubs and
Category:Asian airline stubs. Per speedy creation criterion S2. An incomplete list of stubs can be found at
User:I Am Andumé/List of Turkish airline stubs.
Andumé (
talk) 18:15, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
The
Category:Bryophyte stubs is very large, with over 600 stub articles. It contains {{
Moss-stub}} with over 60 stubs so far; and further, the Petscan tool shows that the
Category:Mosses has
over 600 articles. So I think it would make sense to create the
Category:Moss stubs, as a subcategory of
Category:Bryophyte stubs. Regards, --
Fadesga (
talk) 00:53, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current main page. |
The result of the debate was create as revised.
Category:Cyprinidae stubs currently has a backlog of 812 pages, and not enough subcategories. Therefore, I propose to reorganize it like this:
Current structure:
New structure:
This would involve creating the following categories/templates:
And deleting these categories/templates:
Andumé ( talk) 20:07, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Hi there. The
Category:Ranunculaceae is large, with
over 250 existing stubs. So I propose the creation of
Category:Ranunculaceae stubs. Best, --
Fadesga (
talk) 22:02, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Hi there. The
Category:Boraginaceae is large, with
over 300 existing stubs. So I propose the creation of
Category:Boraginaceae stubs. Best, --
Fadesga (
talk) 21:28, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
The result of the debate was created.
I propose creation of the following:
The result of the debate was created.
I was sorting Ukraine stubs lately and noticed several military-related templates that seem redundant, all uperged to
Category:Ukraine stubs. I can't find any reference to these being proposed, but I'm certainly willing to give them a chance.
I propose Category:Ukrainian military stubs to contain {{ Ukraine-mil-stub}}, as well as an upmerged {{ Ukraine-mil-unit-stub}} (which would be assigned to all the articles currently wearing Ukrainian-navy-stub, Ukraine-minesweeper-stub, UGF-stub, USG-stub, and UAF-stub, after which I would propose those unused templates for deletion). Her Pegship ( ?) 21:55, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
I've done some preliminary analysis leading up to this request, which appears in two sections of
Category talk:Japanese dam stubs: "Stub sorting - sub-categories - some statistics" and "Stub sorting - sub-categories - using PetScan". I propose creating the following stub templates+categories with the prospective article populations listed below.
The numbers are not 100% aligned between the PetScan results and the original stub cat article count, but they are within a dozen or so articles of each other. Creation and re-stubbing along these lines would effectively de-populate Category:Japanese dam stubs with its ~1,600 stubs into sub-cats of between about 140 and 350 articles each. Thanks for your review and approval. --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me) 20:15, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Hi there. The
Category:Alismatales is very large, with
over 100 existing stubs (not yet assigned to a subcategory), in turn part of
over 200 stub-category articles. So I propose the creation of
Category:Alismatales stubs. Best, --
Fadesga (
talk) 19:26, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
The following templates from
Category:European politician stubs have over 60 transclusions:
Cheers. Curbon7 ( talk) 05:13, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Upmerged stub template under
Category:European airline stubs and
Category:Asian airline stubs. Per speedy creation criterion S2. An incomplete list of stubs can be found at
User:I Am Andumé/List of Turkish airline stubs.
Andumé (
talk) 18:15, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
The
Category:Bryophyte stubs is very large, with over 600 stub articles. It contains {{
Moss-stub}} with over 60 stubs so far; and further, the Petscan tool shows that the
Category:Mosses has
over 600 articles. So I think it would make sense to create the
Category:Moss stubs, as a subcategory of
Category:Bryophyte stubs. Regards, --
Fadesga (
talk) 00:53, 2 September 2023 (UTC)