Infobox : Make Infoboxes for Robotics articles which need robotics standards
Stubs : 213 stubs exist of which around 50% could be improved to Start-class
Update : Begin tagging and assessing all related robotics articles with project banner, located on the Template page.
Peer Review
Peer review requests in addition to article reassessment requests can be made here.
Assessment requests
Make new requests on assessment/re-assessment of the article of choice by listing via typing (# [["Title of article"]], Reason: "reason". ~~~~) below. Make sure new requests go on the bottom of the list.
Robot Operating System, Reason: Large restructuring and updates to the article and I'd like to know where to go from here/if my edits were an improvement.
ApprehensiveAndroid (
talk) 07:39, 29 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Botball, Reason: I would like to know what more I can do on this article to improve it and its content. Thank you.
Midorihana~いいですね?はい! 07:40, 25 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Done I'll reply on Botball's talk page. - Dan
Dank55 (
talk) 13:19, 25 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Memristor, Reason: Has not yet been assessed. — C M B J 19:55, 19 July 2008 (UTC)reply
YDone. Article has been assessed as B-Class with Low importance until article is further improved.
- Jameson L. Taitalk ♦
contribs 01:56, 20 July 2008 (UTC)reply
Robot software, Reason: This messy article is unassessed.
Utopianfiat (
talk) 21:05, 8 November 2009 (UTC) Done Quick assessment done - will take a deeper look later this evening.
Chaosdruid (
talk) 21:08, 27 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Gittins index, Reason: I think it should be B-class
217.238.209.29 (
talk) 12:55, 18 July 2010 (UTC) Done Left at Start as the article is in a bit of a state copy wise. Needs copyediting and checking before B class could be assigned. Will check in more depth later this evening
Chaosdruid (
talk) 21:08, 27 July 2010 (UTC)reply
FIRST Lego League, Reason: I think this article may be above start-class and I want to improve it (along with all
FIRST articles).
Chris857 (
talk) 01:36, 15 June 2011 (UTC)reply
Hi - I have had a quick look. Please remember that the robotics project does not use the "C" class in assessments (though it may change in the future). For the article assessment to change it would have to meet "B" class criteria.
There appears to be a problem with the FIRST LEGO league websites so I will take another look over the weekend when, hopefully, the sites have returned.
Chaosdruid (
talk) 16:57, 18 June 2011 (UTC)reply
It appears that both usfirst.org and firstlegoleague.org are having difficulty.
Chris857 (
talk) 19:17, 18 June 2011 (UTC)reply
Cluster analysis, Reason: I spent a lot of time into restructuring this article; many sections have been split or merged out into other articles (such as
hierarchical clustering,
fuzzy clustering,
spectral clustering), and I've tried to bring the article back to the general topic of cluster analysis much more, giving an overview of key concepts and shortening the section of applications. While I plan to add a more "visual" explanation of what cluster analysis is, I believe the article has improved significantly over the last half year (compare:
[1]) and might now deserves a B rating again. And of course, I'd welcome some feedback on structuring the article and what you think is missing to further improve it! Thank you. --
Chire (
talk) 17:24, 8 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Done Left, as a massive list in the middle of the article should probably be moved to a stand-alone list article.
Chaosdruid (
talk) 14:28, 16 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Mean-shift, Reason: I added some formulas and usage examples that offer meaningful content on the technique. I believe this qualifies it for start-class. --Akats, 18 Oct 2011
RoboCup Junior, Reason: I fixed up and updated a lot of the incorrect information from the page. I also removed the comparison to FLL as (a) it is no longer valid (b) it was unreferenced and (c) it isn't really a valid comparison. As recommended by Chaosdruid, we should review the grading of this article.
Wheelandbolt (
talk) 00:35, 23 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Done Left as needs some more work for B
Chaosdruid (
talk) 14:28, 16 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Infobox : Make Infoboxes for Robotics articles which need robotics standards
Stubs : 213 stubs exist of which around 50% could be improved to Start-class
Update : Begin tagging and assessing all related robotics articles with project banner, located on the Template page.
Peer Review
Peer review requests in addition to article reassessment requests can be made here.
Assessment requests
Make new requests on assessment/re-assessment of the article of choice by listing via typing (# [["Title of article"]], Reason: "reason". ~~~~) below. Make sure new requests go on the bottom of the list.
Robot Operating System, Reason: Large restructuring and updates to the article and I'd like to know where to go from here/if my edits were an improvement.
ApprehensiveAndroid (
talk) 07:39, 29 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Botball, Reason: I would like to know what more I can do on this article to improve it and its content. Thank you.
Midorihana~いいですね?はい! 07:40, 25 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Done I'll reply on Botball's talk page. - Dan
Dank55 (
talk) 13:19, 25 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Memristor, Reason: Has not yet been assessed. — C M B J 19:55, 19 July 2008 (UTC)reply
YDone. Article has been assessed as B-Class with Low importance until article is further improved.
- Jameson L. Taitalk ♦
contribs 01:56, 20 July 2008 (UTC)reply
Robot software, Reason: This messy article is unassessed.
Utopianfiat (
talk) 21:05, 8 November 2009 (UTC) Done Quick assessment done - will take a deeper look later this evening.
Chaosdruid (
talk) 21:08, 27 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Gittins index, Reason: I think it should be B-class
217.238.209.29 (
talk) 12:55, 18 July 2010 (UTC) Done Left at Start as the article is in a bit of a state copy wise. Needs copyediting and checking before B class could be assigned. Will check in more depth later this evening
Chaosdruid (
talk) 21:08, 27 July 2010 (UTC)reply
FIRST Lego League, Reason: I think this article may be above start-class and I want to improve it (along with all
FIRST articles).
Chris857 (
talk) 01:36, 15 June 2011 (UTC)reply
Hi - I have had a quick look. Please remember that the robotics project does not use the "C" class in assessments (though it may change in the future). For the article assessment to change it would have to meet "B" class criteria.
There appears to be a problem with the FIRST LEGO league websites so I will take another look over the weekend when, hopefully, the sites have returned.
Chaosdruid (
talk) 16:57, 18 June 2011 (UTC)reply
It appears that both usfirst.org and firstlegoleague.org are having difficulty.
Chris857 (
talk) 19:17, 18 June 2011 (UTC)reply
Cluster analysis, Reason: I spent a lot of time into restructuring this article; many sections have been split or merged out into other articles (such as
hierarchical clustering,
fuzzy clustering,
spectral clustering), and I've tried to bring the article back to the general topic of cluster analysis much more, giving an overview of key concepts and shortening the section of applications. While I plan to add a more "visual" explanation of what cluster analysis is, I believe the article has improved significantly over the last half year (compare:
[1]) and might now deserves a B rating again. And of course, I'd welcome some feedback on structuring the article and what you think is missing to further improve it! Thank you. --
Chire (
talk) 17:24, 8 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Done Left, as a massive list in the middle of the article should probably be moved to a stand-alone list article.
Chaosdruid (
talk) 14:28, 16 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Mean-shift, Reason: I added some formulas and usage examples that offer meaningful content on the technique. I believe this qualifies it for start-class. --Akats, 18 Oct 2011
RoboCup Junior, Reason: I fixed up and updated a lot of the incorrect information from the page. I also removed the comparison to FLL as (a) it is no longer valid (b) it was unreferenced and (c) it isn't really a valid comparison. As recommended by Chaosdruid, we should review the grading of this article.
Wheelandbolt (
talk) 00:35, 23 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Done Left as needs some more work for B
Chaosdruid (
talk) 14:28, 16 February 2012 (UTC)reply