The peer review department of the Pornography WikiProject conducts peer review of articles on request. The primary objective is to encourage better articles by having contributors who may not have worked on articles to examine them and provide ideas for further improvement.
The peer review process is highly flexible and can deal with articles of any quality. The process is intended to make marginal and good quality articles to excellent, encyclopedic ones. However, use of a peer review for articles assessed below the Pornography WikiProject's B-Class may not be a good use of reviewer's time.
Editors with article requests involving significant policy concerns or edit wars should use Wikipedia:Third opinion, Wikipedia:Requests for comment, and/or the Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents for others.) before a peer review.
All reviews are conducted by fellow editors—usually members of the Pornography WikiProject. While there is a general intent to expand this process to allow for review by subject experts, the preparations for this are not yet complete. Please consider reviewing someone else's article too, if you request yours :-)
peer-review=yes
to the {{
WikiProject Pornography}} project banner at the top of the article's talk page (see the
project banner instructions for more details on the exact syntax).=== [[Name of nominated article]] ===
at the top.~~~~
).{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Pornography/Assessment/Peer review/Name of nominated article}}
at the top of the
list of requests on this page.Everyone is encouraged to comment on any request listed here. To comment on an article, please add a new section (using ==== [[User:Your name|Your name]] ====
) for your comments, in order to keep multiple responses legible.
Reviews should be archived after they have been inactive for some time, or when the article is nominated as a featured article candidate. To archive a review:
peer-review=yes
with old-peer-review=yes
in the {{
WikiProject Pornography}} project banner template at the top of the article's talk page{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Pornography/Peer review/Name of nominated article}}
from this page to the
current archive page.
Draft:Alexis DeVell Artemes ( talk) 02:39, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The peer review department of the Pornography WikiProject conducts peer review of articles on request. The primary objective is to encourage better articles by having contributors who may not have worked on articles to examine them and provide ideas for further improvement.
The peer review process is highly flexible and can deal with articles of any quality. The process is intended to make marginal and good quality articles to excellent, encyclopedic ones. However, use of a peer review for articles assessed below the Pornography WikiProject's B-Class may not be a good use of reviewer's time.
Editors with article requests involving significant policy concerns or edit wars should use Wikipedia:Third opinion, Wikipedia:Requests for comment, and/or the Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents for others.) before a peer review.
All reviews are conducted by fellow editors—usually members of the Pornography WikiProject. While there is a general intent to expand this process to allow for review by subject experts, the preparations for this are not yet complete. Please consider reviewing someone else's article too, if you request yours :-)
peer-review=yes
to the {{
WikiProject Pornography}} project banner at the top of the article's talk page (see the
project banner instructions for more details on the exact syntax).=== [[Name of nominated article]] ===
at the top.~~~~
).{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Pornography/Assessment/Peer review/Name of nominated article}}
at the top of the
list of requests on this page.Everyone is encouraged to comment on any request listed here. To comment on an article, please add a new section (using ==== [[User:Your name|Your name]] ====
) for your comments, in order to keep multiple responses legible.
Reviews should be archived after they have been inactive for some time, or when the article is nominated as a featured article candidate. To archive a review:
peer-review=yes
with old-peer-review=yes
in the {{
WikiProject Pornography}} project banner template at the top of the article's talk page{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Pornography/Peer review/Name of nominated article}}
from this page to the
current archive page.
Draft:Alexis DeVell Artemes ( talk) 02:39, 21 May 2020 (UTC)