To request an A-Class review of an article:
A-Class=current
to the {{
WPGUNS}} project banner at the top of the article's talk page and save the page. See the
project banner instructions for more details on the exact syntax.=== [[Name of nominated article]] ===
at the top.~~~~
).Project members are heavily encouraged to participate in the review process, especially if they have specific knowledge of the topic in question. When reviewing the article one should keep the criteria for featured articles in mind when supporting or opposing a nomination. However, remember that unlike actual featured articles, A-Class articles are not expected to fully meet all of the criteria. When opposing a nomination, a reviewer should have substantive issues with the article. Objections over relatively minor issues of writing style or formatting should be avoided at this stage as the article is expected to require a bit more work. A comprehensive, accurate, well-sourced, and decently-written article should qualify for A-Class status even if it could use some further copyediting.
Reviews will be closed by a project coordinator after seven days have elapsed. An article will generally be promoted to A-Class if (a) it has garnered at least three endorsements from uninvolved editors, and (b) there are no substantive objections indicative of a major flaw in the article.
To close a review, coordinator(s) should:
[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Firearms/A-Class review/Name of nominated article/Name of archive]]
). The existing review page will become a redirect to the archive.{{subst:archive top}}
and {{subst:archive bottom}}
to the top and bottom of the review subpage, respectively.A-Class=current
in the {{
WPGUNS}} project banner at the top of the article's talk page to either A-Class=pass
(if the nomination is successful) or A-Class=fail
(if it is not).To request subsequent A-Class reviews (second, third, forth, etc.), simply follow the directions above for requesting a new peer review. The difference will be that instead of creating a new review page, you will edit the existing redirect to the archive into a new review request. New A-Class reviews should not be requested until a project coordinator has archived an existing review.
To request an A-Class review of an article:
A-Class=current
to the {{
WPGUNS}} project banner at the top of the article's talk page and save the page. See the
project banner instructions for more details on the exact syntax.=== [[Name of nominated article]] ===
at the top.~~~~
).Project members are heavily encouraged to participate in the review process, especially if they have specific knowledge of the topic in question. When reviewing the article one should keep the criteria for featured articles in mind when supporting or opposing a nomination. However, remember that unlike actual featured articles, A-Class articles are not expected to fully meet all of the criteria. When opposing a nomination, a reviewer should have substantive issues with the article. Objections over relatively minor issues of writing style or formatting should be avoided at this stage as the article is expected to require a bit more work. A comprehensive, accurate, well-sourced, and decently-written article should qualify for A-Class status even if it could use some further copyediting.
Reviews will be closed by a project coordinator after seven days have elapsed. An article will generally be promoted to A-Class if (a) it has garnered at least three endorsements from uninvolved editors, and (b) there are no substantive objections indicative of a major flaw in the article.
To close a review, coordinator(s) should:
[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Firearms/A-Class review/Name of nominated article/Name of archive]]
). The existing review page will become a redirect to the archive.{{subst:archive top}}
and {{subst:archive bottom}}
to the top and bottom of the review subpage, respectively.A-Class=current
in the {{
WPGUNS}} project banner at the top of the article's talk page to either A-Class=pass
(if the nomination is successful) or A-Class=fail
(if it is not).To request subsequent A-Class reviews (second, third, forth, etc.), simply follow the directions above for requesting a new peer review. The difference will be that instead of creating a new review page, you will edit the existing redirect to the archive into a new review request. New A-Class reviews should not be requested until a project coordinator has archived an existing review.