A-Teams are small groups of at least three editors who work closely together to improve an article to the vaunted A-Class. Collaborative editing is one of the main attractions at Wikipedia. And promoting an article to A-Class on an A-Team is a rewarding experience. An A-Class article presents a complete and thorough encyclopedic treatment of a subject, such as might be written by an expert in the field. An article that undergoes this process must be reviewed by at least two members. The A-Class rating is the highest assessment level that may be assigned by an individual WikiProject; higher assessment levels are granted only by Wikipedia-wide independent assessment processes. For information regarding B-Class and other quality types click here.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
No consensus to promote at this time - Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) via MilHistBot ( talk) 03:20, 25 November 2019 (UTC) « Return to A-Class review list
Instructions for nominators and reviewers
Cold War ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this article for A-Class review because it was recently de-listed at GAR and it appears to be well below our A-Class standard, and needs quite a bit of work to meet it. Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 09:04, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Overall, this needs a lot of love and attention to get it up to A-class standard. Harrias talk 14:03, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Margaret Thatcher ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
A-Class toolbox |
---|
Currently a Good Article, I think it's pretty fair to say this article has come a long way since the subject's death in 2013, and largely for the better in my opinion. I previously brought up the subject of nominating this article for A-Class status in February 2018, see Talk:Margaret Thatcher/Archive 26#A-Class proposal. Two editors (namely JFG and Gravuritas) agreed with my proposal to nominate the article, though at the time no WikiProject this article was of interest in had A-Class capability (thanks Lionelt for the heads-up). Comments and feedback are very much appreciated.-- Neve~ selbert 21:26, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Comment: Hi @ Neveselbert: I'm thrilled that you've nominated Margaret Thatcher to be the first A-Class Review at WP Conservatism. I will start my review presently. Please note @ 1990'sguy: has stepped to to be the second reviewer. – Lionel( talk) 03:41, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
Image review
@ Neveselbert: I recommend that you check all of the licensing and then I'll continue with image review. Thanks! – Lionel( talk) 09:07, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Comment: @ Neveselbert: From the getgo, this article looks pretty good. It has a logical organization and seems thorough. I will look more closely in the coming days, but so far, I have these constructive criticisms:
Comments: some general comments and results of Toolbox checks
– Lionel( talk) 09:14, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
Source Review
– Lionel( talk) 09:14, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
Comments: @ Neveselbert: the article size is 70930. Articles > 50K are candidates for splitting WP:TOOBIG. IMO the Premiership section is too long--especially since there is a standalone article. The section may be overly detailed taking into account this is a Bio. Apart from that, the Bibliography section is still pretty large. – Lionel( talk) 06:41, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
{{
Split}}
tag for each section.--
Neve~
selbert 23:29, 28 May 2018 (UTC)Comment: @ Neveselbert:
– Lionel( talk) 10:03, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
A-Teams are small groups of at least three editors who work closely together to improve an article to the vaunted A-Class. Collaborative editing is one of the main attractions at Wikipedia. And promoting an article to A-Class on an A-Team is a rewarding experience. An A-Class article presents a complete and thorough encyclopedic treatment of a subject, such as might be written by an expert in the field. An article that undergoes this process must be reviewed by at least two members. The A-Class rating is the highest assessment level that may be assigned by an individual WikiProject; higher assessment levels are granted only by Wikipedia-wide independent assessment processes. For information regarding B-Class and other quality types click here.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
No consensus to promote at this time - Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) via MilHistBot ( talk) 03:20, 25 November 2019 (UTC) « Return to A-Class review list
Instructions for nominators and reviewers
Cold War ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this article for A-Class review because it was recently de-listed at GAR and it appears to be well below our A-Class standard, and needs quite a bit of work to meet it. Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 09:04, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Overall, this needs a lot of love and attention to get it up to A-class standard. Harrias talk 14:03, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Margaret Thatcher ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
A-Class toolbox |
---|
Currently a Good Article, I think it's pretty fair to say this article has come a long way since the subject's death in 2013, and largely for the better in my opinion. I previously brought up the subject of nominating this article for A-Class status in February 2018, see Talk:Margaret Thatcher/Archive 26#A-Class proposal. Two editors (namely JFG and Gravuritas) agreed with my proposal to nominate the article, though at the time no WikiProject this article was of interest in had A-Class capability (thanks Lionelt for the heads-up). Comments and feedback are very much appreciated.-- Neve~ selbert 21:26, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Comment: Hi @ Neveselbert: I'm thrilled that you've nominated Margaret Thatcher to be the first A-Class Review at WP Conservatism. I will start my review presently. Please note @ 1990'sguy: has stepped to to be the second reviewer. – Lionel( talk) 03:41, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
Image review
@ Neveselbert: I recommend that you check all of the licensing and then I'll continue with image review. Thanks! – Lionel( talk) 09:07, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Comment: @ Neveselbert: From the getgo, this article looks pretty good. It has a logical organization and seems thorough. I will look more closely in the coming days, but so far, I have these constructive criticisms:
Comments: some general comments and results of Toolbox checks
– Lionel( talk) 09:14, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
Source Review
– Lionel( talk) 09:14, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
Comments: @ Neveselbert: the article size is 70930. Articles > 50K are candidates for splitting WP:TOOBIG. IMO the Premiership section is too long--especially since there is a standalone article. The section may be overly detailed taking into account this is a Bio. Apart from that, the Bibliography section is still pretty large. – Lionel( talk) 06:41, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
{{
Split}}
tag for each section.--
Neve~
selbert 23:29, 28 May 2018 (UTC)Comment: @ Neveselbert:
– Lionel( talk) 10:03, 7 June 2018 (UTC)