Emilio Garcia Gomez
- 1. Suggestions for improving the article.
- 2. The initial review was helpful in that it caused a reworking of the article: the "Life and Works" section was divided into two sections, and the sequence in which the information was presented was refashioned. This has improved the article's clarity and ease of comprehension. So, it should be elevated regarding the quality assessment. Elfelix ( talk) 22:13, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
Javascript review
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program.
- This article has no images. Please see if there are any free use images that fall under the Wikipedia:Image use policy and fit under one of the Wikipedia:Image copyright tags that can be uploaded. To upload images on Wikipedia, go to Special:Upload; to upload non- fair use images on the Wikimedia Commons, go to commons:special:upload. [?]
- Please try to include a free use image in the top right corner of the article. [?]
- You may wish to consider adding an appropriate infobox for this article, if one exists relating to the topic of the article. [?]
- Please add
{{persondata|PLEASE SEE [[WP:PDATA]]!}}along with the required parameters to the article - see Wikipedia:Persondata for more information. [?] - Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at Wikipedia:Guide to layout. [?]
- This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as it could be. Please see if anything can be expanded upon. [?]
- Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [?]
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, DrKiernan ( talk) 17:49, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Emilio Garcia Gomez
- 1. Suggestions for improving the article.
- 2. The initial review was helpful in that it caused a reworking of the article: the "Life and Works" section was divided into two sections, and the sequence in which the information was presented was refashioned. This has improved the article's clarity and ease of comprehension. So, it should be elevated regarding the quality assessment. Elfelix ( talk) 22:13, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
Javascript review
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program.
- This article has no images. Please see if there are any free use images that fall under the Wikipedia:Image use policy and fit under one of the Wikipedia:Image copyright tags that can be uploaded. To upload images on Wikipedia, go to Special:Upload; to upload non- fair use images on the Wikimedia Commons, go to commons:special:upload. [?]
- Please try to include a free use image in the top right corner of the article. [?]
- You may wish to consider adding an appropriate infobox for this article, if one exists relating to the topic of the article. [?]
- Please add
{{persondata|PLEASE SEE [[WP:PDATA]]!}}along with the required parameters to the article - see Wikipedia:Persondata for more information. [?] - Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at Wikipedia:Guide to layout. [?]
- This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as it could be. Please see if anything can be expanded upon. [?]
- Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [?]
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, DrKiernan ( talk) 17:49, 28 December 2007 (UTC)