It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors and is made to be humorous. This page is not one of
Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been
thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. This essay isn't meant to be taken seriously.
People are always trying to get articles about themselves on Wikipedia. Usually, though, when people try to create articles about themselves, those articles are deleted almost immediately, since the person in question obviously does not meet Wikipedia's standards of
encyclopedic notability. Here is a list of unusual ideas some Wikipedia editors came up with for how you could potentially acquire significant enough coverage in secondary sources to make yourself encyclopedically notable enough to warrant an article about yourself on Wikipedia:
Create a better Wikipedia, then claim you made it before this Wikipedia and sue Wikipedia into uploading your article
Get your article published as a humorous article so it doesn't need 99 sources.
Making a list like this, and I bet there needs to be references in order for this to be valid. Right?citation needed
DISCLAIMER: Some of the ideas on this list may be illegal in your jurisdiction. The ideas on this list are only ideas; they are not suggestions. The Wikimedia Foundation and the editors involved in the creation of this list are not in any way morally or legally responsible for any bodily harm, damage of property, imprisonment, or any other negative outcomes that may result from following through with any of the ideas on this list. This is a list of ideas; this list makes no guarantees or certifications. Readers who make use of the ideas on this list may not necessarily receive an article on Wikipedia. Please contact your doctor if you experience an erection lasting more than four hours.
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors and is made to be humorous. This page is not one of
Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been
thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. This essay isn't meant to be taken seriously.
People are always trying to get articles about themselves on Wikipedia. Usually, though, when people try to create articles about themselves, those articles are deleted almost immediately, since the person in question obviously does not meet Wikipedia's standards of
encyclopedic notability. Here is a list of unusual ideas some Wikipedia editors came up with for how you could potentially acquire significant enough coverage in secondary sources to make yourself encyclopedically notable enough to warrant an article about yourself on Wikipedia:
Create a better Wikipedia, then claim you made it before this Wikipedia and sue Wikipedia into uploading your article
Get your article published as a humorous article so it doesn't need 99 sources.
Making a list like this, and I bet there needs to be references in order for this to be valid. Right?citation needed
DISCLAIMER: Some of the ideas on this list may be illegal in your jurisdiction. The ideas on this list are only ideas; they are not suggestions. The Wikimedia Foundation and the editors involved in the creation of this list are not in any way morally or legally responsible for any bodily harm, damage of property, imprisonment, or any other negative outcomes that may result from following through with any of the ideas on this list. This is a list of ideas; this list makes no guarantees or certifications. Readers who make use of the ideas on this list may not necessarily receive an article on Wikipedia. Please contact your doctor if you experience an erection lasting more than four hours.