A -
B -
C -
D -
E -
F -
G -
H -
I -
J -
K -
L -
M -
N -
O -
P -
Q -
R -
S -
T -
U -
V -
W -
X -
Y -
Z
202 - Lets get going on Project #17!
The-Pope (
talk) 12:19, 31 March 2011 (UTC)reply
178 - and the initial surge is on - 10% done in 4 hours... can we finish it in 2 days? A look at the list shows plenty of Iranians... anyone speak
Farsi?
The-Pope (
talk) 16:44, 31 March 2011 (UTC)reply
93 - S done apart from one PROD, one copyvio and one Saudi Prince,
Sultan bin Saud for whom I cannot find any sources. You'd have thought there would be something, but this needs another pair of eyes. If anyone does manage to source it, perhaps you could sort out
the other royal Saudi football fans at the same time.--
CharlieDelta (
talk) 20:21, 2 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Crikey, that looks tough, but I'll take a shot at it. I was all convinced I could find him through his dad, before realizing that his dad had over 100 children.... --
joe deckertalk to me 20:28, 2 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Okay, I have something.
[1] this looks like the same person in Arabic, which I tracked down through the enormous list of King Saud's sons in the Arabic wikipedia. The Royal Guard claim in that article ties into claims in this book
[2] of a Sultan bin Saud who had a similar position. Awfully sketchy. I've added the relevant links to the WP page, but feedback appreciated. --
joe deckertalk to me 20:53, 2 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Good enough, I think. He clearly exists and that's a reputable publisher. Thanks.--
CharlieDelta (
talk) 21:05, 2 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Note: With 22 at deletion, there are really only 14 left to go! --
joe deckertalk to me 15:09, 4 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Hey, can anyone make sense of whether
Omprakash Singh and
Om Prakash Singh are the same person? The career spans don't overlap well, etc., but ... I'm honestly just not sure. --
joe deckertalk to me 16:21, 4 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Yeah. The article is in fact a mess. I did find a ref, with a quote that I had to pull out of the Google books search results since it wasn't visible in the text, but it does confirm "MLA of party X", which is something. --
joe deckertalk to me 20:56, 4 April 2011 (UTC)reply
A -
B -
C -
D -
E -
F -
G -
H -
I -
J -
K -
L -
M -
N -
O -
P -
Q -
R -
S -
T -
U -
V -
W -
X -
Y -
Z
202 - Lets get going on Project #17!
The-Pope (
talk) 12:19, 31 March 2011 (UTC)reply
178 - and the initial surge is on - 10% done in 4 hours... can we finish it in 2 days? A look at the list shows plenty of Iranians... anyone speak
Farsi?
The-Pope (
talk) 16:44, 31 March 2011 (UTC)reply
93 - S done apart from one PROD, one copyvio and one Saudi Prince,
Sultan bin Saud for whom I cannot find any sources. You'd have thought there would be something, but this needs another pair of eyes. If anyone does manage to source it, perhaps you could sort out
the other royal Saudi football fans at the same time.--
CharlieDelta (
talk) 20:21, 2 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Crikey, that looks tough, but I'll take a shot at it. I was all convinced I could find him through his dad, before realizing that his dad had over 100 children.... --
joe deckertalk to me 20:28, 2 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Okay, I have something.
[1] this looks like the same person in Arabic, which I tracked down through the enormous list of King Saud's sons in the Arabic wikipedia. The Royal Guard claim in that article ties into claims in this book
[2] of a Sultan bin Saud who had a similar position. Awfully sketchy. I've added the relevant links to the WP page, but feedback appreciated. --
joe deckertalk to me 20:53, 2 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Good enough, I think. He clearly exists and that's a reputable publisher. Thanks.--
CharlieDelta (
talk) 21:05, 2 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Note: With 22 at deletion, there are really only 14 left to go! --
joe deckertalk to me 15:09, 4 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Hey, can anyone make sense of whether
Omprakash Singh and
Om Prakash Singh are the same person? The career spans don't overlap well, etc., but ... I'm honestly just not sure. --
joe deckertalk to me 16:21, 4 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Yeah. The article is in fact a mess. I did find a ref, with a quote that I had to pull out of the Google books search results since it wasn't visible in the text, but it does confirm "MLA of party X", which is something. --
joe deckertalk to me 20:56, 4 April 2011 (UTC)reply