The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:42, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Unused template that does not seem to work. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:52, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:42, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Unused template that does not seem to work. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:52, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:41, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Unused template that does not seem to work. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:52, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:39, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
This is not what a navbox is for, better suited to an article if it really is notable. -- wooden superman 14:33, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
a grouping of links used in multiple related articles to facilitate navigation between those articleswhich is exactly what this is, and exactly what it is for. Similar to other award/recognition navboxes we use in television, this is not really any different than something like {{ EmmyAward DramaWriting}} or {{ EmmyAward ComedyWriting}} which have accompanying articles ( Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Writing for a Drama Series and Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Writing for a Comedy Series respectively), or a plethora of other similar navbox/article combinations. ButlerBlog ( talk) 15:58, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
not a major award, and they've
produced a list on their opinion of what were the best [movies]. I get it - WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS works both directions:
you cannot make a convincing argument based solely on whether other articles do or do not exist(emphasis added). That's why I've pointed out this is notable because it's TV Guide (as the AFI list is notable because it's AFI). It's not some random mag or somebody's blog. At the time of the original list, people didn't go to the Internet or Wikipedia for information on what to watch - they went to TV Guide. It's a recognized source for both the TV project ( WP:TVRS) and in general WP:RSP, and (as already noted) it's a list of articles that the TV project has noted as high priorty. ButlerBlog ( talk) 14:33, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
It is neither improper nor uncommon to simultaneously have a category, a list, and a navigation template that all cover the same topic. These systems of organizing information are considered to be complementary, not inappropriately duplicative.As stated above, it's notable. ButlerBlog ( talk) 11:35, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
It is neither improper nor uncommon to simultaneously have a category, a list, and a navigation template that all cover the same topic. These systems of organizing information are considered to be complementary, not inappropriately duplicative.ButlerBlog ( talk) 16:01, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:39, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
This is not what a navbox is for, better suited to an article if it really is notable. -- wooden superman 14:33, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
a grouping of links used in multiple related articles to facilitate navigation between those articleswhich is exactly what this is, and exactly what it is for. Similar to other award/recognition navboxes we use in television, this is not really any different than something like {{ EmmyAward DramaWriting}} or {{ EmmyAward ComedyWriting}} which have accompanying articles ( Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Writing for a Drama Series and Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Writing for a Comedy Series respectively), or a plethora of other similar navbox/article combinations. ButlerBlog ( talk) 15:58, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 13:11, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Used only on one old talk page. Subst there and delete. Gonnym ( talk) 12:19, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 13:07, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Unused bracket template. Gonnym ( talk) 12:09, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:42, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Unused template that does not seem to work. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:52, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:42, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Unused template that does not seem to work. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:52, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:41, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Unused template that does not seem to work. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:52, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:39, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
This is not what a navbox is for, better suited to an article if it really is notable. -- wooden superman 14:33, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
a grouping of links used in multiple related articles to facilitate navigation between those articleswhich is exactly what this is, and exactly what it is for. Similar to other award/recognition navboxes we use in television, this is not really any different than something like {{ EmmyAward DramaWriting}} or {{ EmmyAward ComedyWriting}} which have accompanying articles ( Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Writing for a Drama Series and Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Writing for a Comedy Series respectively), or a plethora of other similar navbox/article combinations. ButlerBlog ( talk) 15:58, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
not a major award, and they've
produced a list on their opinion of what were the best [movies]. I get it - WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS works both directions:
you cannot make a convincing argument based solely on whether other articles do or do not exist(emphasis added). That's why I've pointed out this is notable because it's TV Guide (as the AFI list is notable because it's AFI). It's not some random mag or somebody's blog. At the time of the original list, people didn't go to the Internet or Wikipedia for information on what to watch - they went to TV Guide. It's a recognized source for both the TV project ( WP:TVRS) and in general WP:RSP, and (as already noted) it's a list of articles that the TV project has noted as high priorty. ButlerBlog ( talk) 14:33, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
It is neither improper nor uncommon to simultaneously have a category, a list, and a navigation template that all cover the same topic. These systems of organizing information are considered to be complementary, not inappropriately duplicative.As stated above, it's notable. ButlerBlog ( talk) 11:35, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
It is neither improper nor uncommon to simultaneously have a category, a list, and a navigation template that all cover the same topic. These systems of organizing information are considered to be complementary, not inappropriately duplicative.ButlerBlog ( talk) 16:01, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:39, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
This is not what a navbox is for, better suited to an article if it really is notable. -- wooden superman 14:33, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
a grouping of links used in multiple related articles to facilitate navigation between those articleswhich is exactly what this is, and exactly what it is for. Similar to other award/recognition navboxes we use in television, this is not really any different than something like {{ EmmyAward DramaWriting}} or {{ EmmyAward ComedyWriting}} which have accompanying articles ( Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Writing for a Drama Series and Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Writing for a Comedy Series respectively), or a plethora of other similar navbox/article combinations. ButlerBlog ( talk) 15:58, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 13:11, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Used only on one old talk page. Subst there and delete. Gonnym ( talk) 12:19, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 13:07, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Unused bracket template. Gonnym ( talk) 12:09, 22 May 2023 (UTC)