From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 29

Template:Largest cities of Jordan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 05:53, 6 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Single-use article content template. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 23:58, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Delete Subst per nomination. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 00:32, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete No reason for this template (because the content isn't shared between articles). Subst and delete. — hike395 ( talk) 14:37, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Rockford and Interurban

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 05:55, 6 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Unused and no mainspace for use. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 23:02, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Manila LRT Yellow Line

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 22:24, 5 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Not needed as LRT Line 1 (Metro Manila) has detailed route map in the infobox. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 22:14, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sōtetsu and Tōkyū Shin-Yokohama Lines

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:10, 5 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Unused and nothing but text. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 22:06, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Delete. Not sure how this would even be used? Mackensen (talk) 00:05, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply
  • DeleteDaxServer ( t · m · c) 20:35, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply
  • delete: unused; functioning navbox templates for the tokyu/sotetsu shin-yokohama lines already exist and are used at their respective articles. Nyamo Kurosawa ( talk) 19:30, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per everyone else. XtraJovial ( talkcontribs) 15:06, 1 February 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Khulna-Dhaka line

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 February 5. Izno ( talk) 22:24, 5 February 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Khulna-Mongla Port line

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was move to correct title Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:13, 5 February 2023 (UTC) reply

{{ Khulna-Mongla Port line}} (with hyphen) is used; {{ Khulna–Mongla Port line}} (with en-dash) is the unused one. Useddenim ( talk) 03:48, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Merge both. We have templates for the same line. We can merge them. Mehedi Abedin 03:55, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply
If one of the Khulna–Mongla templates is to be kept, it should be the one with the dash (not hyphen) in the title, per MOS. The hyphenated template should be redirected to the merge target. Content from whichever template is better should end up at the merge target. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 05:58, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ Jonesey95: The correct content is at hyphen, so it should be moved to Ndash and become a redirect. I think that might require an admin for the WP:HISTMERGE? Useddenim ( talk) 01:01, 2 February 2023 (UTC) Useddenim ( talk) 01:01, 2 February 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Fatehabad–Kaptai line

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 February 5. Izno ( talk) 21:55, 5 February 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:East–West Trunk Line (RIT)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 21:55, 5 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Unused and no articles for use. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 21:50, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Thiruvananthapuram Monorail Map

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:02, 5 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Unused. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 20:13, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Edmonton–Drumheller train map

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 February 5. Izno ( talk) 20:12, 5 February 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Coast Rail Corridor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 20:09, 5 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Unused. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 19:56, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PNR Northrail

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 February 5. Izno ( talk) 20:10, 5 February 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Olive Subdivision

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 February 5. Izno ( talk) 20:10, 5 February 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:UGM Bus Route

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 February 5. Izno ( talk) 20:11, 5 February 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Seattle Subdivision

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Izno ( talk) 20:10, 5 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Unused. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 19:25, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Black Butte Subdivision

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 February 5. Izno ( talk) 20:10, 5 February 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bakersfield Subdivision

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 February 5. Izno ( talk) 20:11, 5 February 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Guerneville Branch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 February 5. Izno ( talk) 20:11, 5 February 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mojahedin offshoots

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 18:35, 5 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Unused chart format template. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 16:38, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Delete per nomination. This is a useless template that formed part of a larger scheme of articles, all of which have now been deleted for not being notable and WP:OR. Fad Ariff ( talk) 13:02, 2 February 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Turco-Mongol

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Izno ( talk) 18:35, 5 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Propose merging Template:Turco-Mongol with Template:Mongol Empire.
I propose merging Template:Turco-Mongol (created in 2020) into Template:Mongol Empire (created in 2007). They already largely overlap, and I think the content in Template:Turco-Mongol (which essentially has Turco-Mongol tradition, i.e. the political and cultural legacy of the Mongol Empire, as its subject) can easily be explained in the context of Template:Mongol Empire. A merger would not cause any template-size problems (because it is autocollapsible) or weighting problems in Template:Mongol Empire. Nederlandse Leeuw ( talk) 15:52, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:BSA, Western Region, Area 4, Council locations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 18:35, 5 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Unused maps. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 15:30, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Please move them to somewhere in my userspace rather than delete them. Thanks! Banaticus ( talk) 00:57, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Vandalism (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 18:33, 5 February 2023 (UTC) reply

WP:NENAN, only three four targets. Muhandes ( talk) 14:47, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 29

Template:Largest cities of Jordan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 05:53, 6 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Single-use article content template. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 23:58, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Delete Subst per nomination. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 00:32, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete No reason for this template (because the content isn't shared between articles). Subst and delete. — hike395 ( talk) 14:37, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Rockford and Interurban

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 05:55, 6 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Unused and no mainspace for use. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 23:02, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Manila LRT Yellow Line

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 22:24, 5 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Not needed as LRT Line 1 (Metro Manila) has detailed route map in the infobox. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 22:14, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sōtetsu and Tōkyū Shin-Yokohama Lines

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:10, 5 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Unused and nothing but text. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 22:06, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Delete. Not sure how this would even be used? Mackensen (talk) 00:05, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply
  • DeleteDaxServer ( t · m · c) 20:35, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply
  • delete: unused; functioning navbox templates for the tokyu/sotetsu shin-yokohama lines already exist and are used at their respective articles. Nyamo Kurosawa ( talk) 19:30, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per everyone else. XtraJovial ( talkcontribs) 15:06, 1 February 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Khulna-Dhaka line

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 February 5. Izno ( talk) 22:24, 5 February 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Khulna-Mongla Port line

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was move to correct title Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:13, 5 February 2023 (UTC) reply

{{ Khulna-Mongla Port line}} (with hyphen) is used; {{ Khulna–Mongla Port line}} (with en-dash) is the unused one. Useddenim ( talk) 03:48, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Merge both. We have templates for the same line. We can merge them. Mehedi Abedin 03:55, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply
If one of the Khulna–Mongla templates is to be kept, it should be the one with the dash (not hyphen) in the title, per MOS. The hyphenated template should be redirected to the merge target. Content from whichever template is better should end up at the merge target. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 05:58, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ Jonesey95: The correct content is at hyphen, so it should be moved to Ndash and become a redirect. I think that might require an admin for the WP:HISTMERGE? Useddenim ( talk) 01:01, 2 February 2023 (UTC) Useddenim ( talk) 01:01, 2 February 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Fatehabad–Kaptai line

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 February 5. Izno ( talk) 21:55, 5 February 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:East–West Trunk Line (RIT)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 21:55, 5 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Unused and no articles for use. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 21:50, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Thiruvananthapuram Monorail Map

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:02, 5 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Unused. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 20:13, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Edmonton–Drumheller train map

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 February 5. Izno ( talk) 20:12, 5 February 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Coast Rail Corridor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 20:09, 5 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Unused. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 19:56, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PNR Northrail

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 February 5. Izno ( talk) 20:10, 5 February 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Olive Subdivision

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 February 5. Izno ( talk) 20:10, 5 February 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:UGM Bus Route

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 February 5. Izno ( talk) 20:11, 5 February 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Seattle Subdivision

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Izno ( talk) 20:10, 5 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Unused. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 19:25, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Black Butte Subdivision

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 February 5. Izno ( talk) 20:10, 5 February 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bakersfield Subdivision

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 February 5. Izno ( talk) 20:11, 5 February 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Guerneville Branch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 February 5. Izno ( talk) 20:11, 5 February 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mojahedin offshoots

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 18:35, 5 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Unused chart format template. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 16:38, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Delete per nomination. This is a useless template that formed part of a larger scheme of articles, all of which have now been deleted for not being notable and WP:OR. Fad Ariff ( talk) 13:02, 2 February 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Turco-Mongol

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Izno ( talk) 18:35, 5 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Propose merging Template:Turco-Mongol with Template:Mongol Empire.
I propose merging Template:Turco-Mongol (created in 2020) into Template:Mongol Empire (created in 2007). They already largely overlap, and I think the content in Template:Turco-Mongol (which essentially has Turco-Mongol tradition, i.e. the political and cultural legacy of the Mongol Empire, as its subject) can easily be explained in the context of Template:Mongol Empire. A merger would not cause any template-size problems (because it is autocollapsible) or weighting problems in Template:Mongol Empire. Nederlandse Leeuw ( talk) 15:52, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:BSA, Western Region, Area 4, Council locations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 18:35, 5 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Unused maps. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 15:30, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Please move them to somewhere in my userspace rather than delete them. Thanks! Banaticus ( talk) 00:57, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Vandalism (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 18:33, 5 February 2023 (UTC) reply

WP:NENAN, only three four targets. Muhandes ( talk) 14:47, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook