- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Izno (
talk) 05:53, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
reply
Single-use article content template. Subst and delete. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 23:58, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Delete Subst per nomination. --
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 00:32, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Delete No reason for this template (because the content isn't shared between articles). Subst and delete. —
hike395 (
talk) 14:37, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Izno (
talk) 05:55, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
reply
Unused and no mainspace for use.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 23:02, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Izno (
talk) 22:24, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
reply
Not needed as
LRT Line 1 (Metro Manila) has detailed route map in the infobox.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 22:14, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 21:10, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
reply
Unused and nothing but text.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 22:06, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. Not sure how this would even be used?
Mackensen
(talk) 00:05, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Delete —
DaxServer (
t ·
m ·
c) 20:35, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- delete: unused; functioning navbox templates for the tokyu/sotetsu shin-yokohama lines already exist and are used at their respective articles.
Nyamo Kurosawa (
talk) 19:30, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per everyone else.
XtraJovial (
talk •
contribs) 15:06, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on
2023 February 5.
Izno (
talk) 22:24, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was move to correct title
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 21:13, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
reply
{{
Khulna-Mongla Port line}} (with hyphen) is used; {{
Khulna–Mongla Port line}} (with en-dash) is the unused one.
Useddenim (
talk) 03:48, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Merge both. We have templates for the same line. We can merge them.
Mehedi Abedin 03:55, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- If one of the Khulna–Mongla templates is to be kept, it should be the one with the dash (not hyphen) in the title, per MOS. The hyphenated template should be redirected to the merge target. Content from whichever template is better should end up at the merge target. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 05:58, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- @
Jonesey95: The correct content is at hyphen, so it should be moved to Ndash and become a redirect. I think that might require an admin for the
WP:HISTMERGE?
Useddenim (
talk) 01:01, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Useddenim (
talk) 01:01, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on
2023 February 5.
Izno (
talk) 21:55, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Izno (
talk) 21:55, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
reply
Unused and no articles for use.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 21:50, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 21:02, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
reply
Unused.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 20:13, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on
2023 February 5.
Izno (
talk) 20:12, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Izno (
talk) 20:09, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
reply
Unused.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 19:56, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on
2023 February 5.
Izno (
talk) 20:10, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on
2023 February 5.
Izno (
talk) 20:10, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on
2023 February 5.
Izno (
talk) 20:11, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was keep.
Izno (
talk) 20:10, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
reply
Unused.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 19:25, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on
2023 February 5.
Izno (
talk) 20:10, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on
2023 February 5.
Izno (
talk) 20:11, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on
2023 February 5.
Izno (
talk) 20:11, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Izno (
talk) 18:35, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
reply
Unused chart format template.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 16:38, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nomination. This is a useless template that formed part of a larger scheme of articles, all of which have now been deleted for not being notable and WP:OR.
Fad Ariff (
talk) 13:02, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was keep.
Izno (
talk) 18:35, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
reply
Propose merging
Template:Turco-Mongol with
Template:Mongol Empire.
I propose merging
Template:Turco-Mongol (created in 2020) into
Template:Mongol Empire (created in 2007). They already largely overlap, and I think the content in Template:Turco-Mongol (which essentially has
Turco-Mongol tradition, i.e. the political and cultural legacy of the
Mongol Empire, as its subject) can easily be explained in the context of Template:Mongol Empire. A merger would not cause any template-size problems (because it is autocollapsible) or
weighting problems in Template:Mongol Empire.
Nederlandse Leeuw (
talk) 15:52, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Izno (
talk) 18:35, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
reply
Unused maps.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 15:30, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Please move them to somewhere in my userspace rather than delete them. Thanks!
Banaticus (
talk) 00:57, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Izno (
talk) 18:33, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
reply
WP:NENAN, only three four targets.
Muhandes (
talk) 14:47, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).