From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 18

Template:QingdaoM color

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:36, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Qingdao Metro, Module:Adjacent stations/Guiyang Metro, Module:Adjacent stations/Hefei Metro, Module:Adjacent stations/Jinan Metro, Module:Adjacent stations/Lanzhou Metro, and Module:Adjacent stations/Wenzhou Rail Transit. Gonnym ( talk) 23:41, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Istanbul Metro stations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:36, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/Istanbul Metro. Frietjes ( talk) 22:39, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Delete per nom. The style templates ( Template:M1 style, etc.) still need to be replaced. Gonnym ( talk) 23:44, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply
Added a few styles that were unused. -- Gonnym ( talk) 23:49, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FHR

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. plicit 23:38, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Unused flag template. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 20:28, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:Ulam spiral

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request undeletion of these modules. plicit 23:38, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Unused module which produces the Ulam spiral template, also unused, but has been known to have color contrast issues. Seems unlikely both of these would have any use anywhere unless this could be used on Ulam spiral. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 20:26, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Semantic Web Services Language (SWSL)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. plicit 23:39, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Broken template format that duplicates sources used on Semantic Web Services Language. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 20:18, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CSLI Navy OR

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request undeletion of these templates. plicit 23:39, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Unused military rank/insignia templates. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 20:14, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Reference values for the HICP and interest rate convergence criteria (2013)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 April 27. Izno ( talk) 02:16, 27 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:New Byzantium succession

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. plicit 23:40, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Unused family tree chart which may not be accurate. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 20:10, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Same-sex marriage opinion polls sub-nations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. plicit 23:40, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Unused chart. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 20:10, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:List of snow-producing Atlantic tropical cyclones

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. plicit 23:40, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Unused chart. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 20:07, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PLAAF aircraft inventory

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. plicit 23:41, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Unused and not needed as the same list is featured on People's Liberation Army Air Force under the current inventory section. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 20:06, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Major National and State parties TN

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. plicit 23:41, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Unused chart of political parties in Tamil Nadu, India. Maybe it can be substituted on List of political parties in Tamil Nadu. But the parties are presented in list format. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 20:02, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Razr

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. plicit 23:41, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

"Template to emphasize tex by letter-spacing". Does nothing but transclude itself. Only edit history has been it's creation and a minor edit following that by two minutes. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 20:00, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lonoikahaupu, Keawepoepoe, Keeaumoku Pāpaiahiahi, Kamanawa and Kameʻeiamoku family tree

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 April 25. plicit 23:42, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WarningsTable

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:41, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

No transclusions, documentation, categories, or incoming links. Created six months ago. OK to userfy if the creator wants to keep working on it. Creator's account is globally locked. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 19:51, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Edgar Lungu Cabinet 2016

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. plicit 23:42, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Unused with no mainspace for use. Was being transcluded as a link in a navbox before removal. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 19:24, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

If wanted, this can be subst to 2016 Zambian general election. Gonnym ( talk) 12:37, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Nbbt links

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:42, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

No transclusions or incoming links. Created in 2015, no substantive edits since then. It appears that this template has not been adopted anywhere. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 19:11, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Comparison of Macintosh laptop models

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. plicit 23:43, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Unused. Information related to this is already featured on Comparison of current Macintosh models. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 19:11, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Pakistan Armed Forces sidebar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:43, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

This infobox has no transclusions, having apparently been incorporated into the only possible place for it, Pakistan Armed Forces, at some point. Not usable. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 19:10, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lang-may

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 April 27. Izno ( talk) 02:16, 27 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Istanbul mass transit color

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:43, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

No transclusions. Replaced with Module:Adjacent stations/Istanbul Metro. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 18:56, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Alihodzic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:45, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Unused citation template. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 18:54, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Delete. Created by a user with 3 edits. Might even have been an incorrect attempt in using a citation. Gonnym ( talk) 09:14, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:AMD Ryzen Mobile 3000 series

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request undeletion of these templates. plicit 23:45, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Unused charts. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 18:48, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Benson-Convertibles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:45, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Unused citation template. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 17:38, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Delete. Created 8 years ago and is unused. Gonnym ( talk) 09:13, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Saltivska style

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:46, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

No transclusions. Pages using it have been updated to use Module:Adjacent stations/Kharkiv Metro. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 17:24, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Town and Cantonment wise map of Lahore

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:46, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Unused map template. File image is already used on dozens of articles across Wikipedia including two other used templates. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 16:12, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Delete. Template:Lahore City District is used instead. Gonnym ( talk) 09:12, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hong Kong Public Organizations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:46, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

A giant mass of text with only four links to articles. Currently used on a draft submitted for review of the same name, Draft:Hong Kong Public Organizations. This does not aid in navigation. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 14:57, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Delete. Wow. This isn't how a navbox should be used. Gonnym ( talk) 09:11, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Shmee150 graphical timeline

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:41, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

No transclusions, documentation, incoming links, or categories. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 13:34, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Affleck-On Track

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Frietjes ( talk) 18:51, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Unused citation template. The exact citation is used outside of template space on 19 pages. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 00:08, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Speedy keep Thanks for the heads up. There were two difficulties leading to the non-use of the template. First, an editor had discovered that there was a technical problem with the way the template citation linked with sfn inline tags. Instead of fixing that technical problem, the editor deleted the template from the article and substituted a custom made citation. Secondly, various articles have had a custom citation added by other editors in apparent ignorance of the citation template. Both of these difficulties of course defeated the very purpose of the citation template, which is to ensure that a frequently cited book is properly cited uniformly throughout the encyclopedia. I have now fixed the technical problem (which required only the removal of one of the template citation's parameters) and have been adding the template to the pages where it should have been used but wasn't. That should lead to a keeping of the template, which is now on multiple articles as intended. Bahnfrend ( talk) 06:56, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply
    "Speedy keep" a first comment is very meaningless. Gonnym ( talk) 08:17, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Keep per Bahnfrend's explanation, and the high level of utility of the book in the history of rail transport in western australia. JarrahTree 07:58, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Keep, now that it is transcluded in a dozen articles. I have fixed the false-positive sfn errors. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 15:14, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Comment This can be closed now since the formatting has been fixed and is now used on the same articles I pointed out in the nomination. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 15:50, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Second French intervention in Mexico infobox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:42, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

An infobox for this conflict already exists on Second French intervention in Mexico as part of the article. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 00:04, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

There is certainly no benefit in duplication. The sole issue is whether the infobox, which is very large, is better hosted as a separate template or as a part of an already big article. — Brigade Piron ( talk) 07:23, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply
Delete as infoboxes should be used directly inside the article. The only reason an infobox like this looks big is because the usage of references inside the infobox contrary to MOS:INFOBOXREF. Gonnym ( talk) 08:22, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply
Is the statement that "infoboxes should be used directly inside the article" an actual policy, or a statement of preference? Even without references, it would be pretty big. — Brigade Piron ( talk) 16:47, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply
Infoboxes are big, tables are big, prose sections are big. Should we start moving everything to stand-alone templates now? Gonnym ( talk) 09:09, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 18

Template:QingdaoM color

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:36, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Qingdao Metro, Module:Adjacent stations/Guiyang Metro, Module:Adjacent stations/Hefei Metro, Module:Adjacent stations/Jinan Metro, Module:Adjacent stations/Lanzhou Metro, and Module:Adjacent stations/Wenzhou Rail Transit. Gonnym ( talk) 23:41, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Istanbul Metro stations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:36, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/Istanbul Metro. Frietjes ( talk) 22:39, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Delete per nom. The style templates ( Template:M1 style, etc.) still need to be replaced. Gonnym ( talk) 23:44, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply
Added a few styles that were unused. -- Gonnym ( talk) 23:49, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FHR

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. plicit 23:38, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Unused flag template. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 20:28, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:Ulam spiral

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request undeletion of these modules. plicit 23:38, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Unused module which produces the Ulam spiral template, also unused, but has been known to have color contrast issues. Seems unlikely both of these would have any use anywhere unless this could be used on Ulam spiral. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 20:26, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Semantic Web Services Language (SWSL)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. plicit 23:39, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Broken template format that duplicates sources used on Semantic Web Services Language. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 20:18, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CSLI Navy OR

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request undeletion of these templates. plicit 23:39, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Unused military rank/insignia templates. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 20:14, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Reference values for the HICP and interest rate convergence criteria (2013)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 April 27. Izno ( talk) 02:16, 27 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:New Byzantium succession

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. plicit 23:40, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Unused family tree chart which may not be accurate. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 20:10, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Same-sex marriage opinion polls sub-nations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. plicit 23:40, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Unused chart. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 20:10, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:List of snow-producing Atlantic tropical cyclones

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. plicit 23:40, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Unused chart. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 20:07, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PLAAF aircraft inventory

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. plicit 23:41, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Unused and not needed as the same list is featured on People's Liberation Army Air Force under the current inventory section. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 20:06, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Major National and State parties TN

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. plicit 23:41, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Unused chart of political parties in Tamil Nadu, India. Maybe it can be substituted on List of political parties in Tamil Nadu. But the parties are presented in list format. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 20:02, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Razr

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. plicit 23:41, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

"Template to emphasize tex by letter-spacing". Does nothing but transclude itself. Only edit history has been it's creation and a minor edit following that by two minutes. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 20:00, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lonoikahaupu, Keawepoepoe, Keeaumoku Pāpaiahiahi, Kamanawa and Kameʻeiamoku family tree

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 April 25. plicit 23:42, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WarningsTable

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:41, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

No transclusions, documentation, categories, or incoming links. Created six months ago. OK to userfy if the creator wants to keep working on it. Creator's account is globally locked. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 19:51, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Edgar Lungu Cabinet 2016

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. plicit 23:42, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Unused with no mainspace for use. Was being transcluded as a link in a navbox before removal. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 19:24, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

If wanted, this can be subst to 2016 Zambian general election. Gonnym ( talk) 12:37, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Nbbt links

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:42, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

No transclusions or incoming links. Created in 2015, no substantive edits since then. It appears that this template has not been adopted anywhere. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 19:11, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Comparison of Macintosh laptop models

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. plicit 23:43, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Unused. Information related to this is already featured on Comparison of current Macintosh models. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 19:11, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Pakistan Armed Forces sidebar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:43, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

This infobox has no transclusions, having apparently been incorporated into the only possible place for it, Pakistan Armed Forces, at some point. Not usable. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 19:10, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lang-may

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 April 27. Izno ( talk) 02:16, 27 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Istanbul mass transit color

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:43, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

No transclusions. Replaced with Module:Adjacent stations/Istanbul Metro. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 18:56, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Alihodzic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:45, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Unused citation template. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 18:54, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Delete. Created by a user with 3 edits. Might even have been an incorrect attempt in using a citation. Gonnym ( talk) 09:14, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:AMD Ryzen Mobile 3000 series

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request undeletion of these templates. plicit 23:45, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Unused charts. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 18:48, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Benson-Convertibles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:45, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Unused citation template. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 17:38, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Delete. Created 8 years ago and is unused. Gonnym ( talk) 09:13, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Saltivska style

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:46, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

No transclusions. Pages using it have been updated to use Module:Adjacent stations/Kharkiv Metro. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 17:24, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Town and Cantonment wise map of Lahore

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:46, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Unused map template. File image is already used on dozens of articles across Wikipedia including two other used templates. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 16:12, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Delete. Template:Lahore City District is used instead. Gonnym ( talk) 09:12, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hong Kong Public Organizations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:46, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

A giant mass of text with only four links to articles. Currently used on a draft submitted for review of the same name, Draft:Hong Kong Public Organizations. This does not aid in navigation. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 14:57, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Delete. Wow. This isn't how a navbox should be used. Gonnym ( talk) 09:11, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Shmee150 graphical timeline

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:41, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

No transclusions, documentation, incoming links, or categories. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 13:34, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Affleck-On Track

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Frietjes ( talk) 18:51, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Unused citation template. The exact citation is used outside of template space on 19 pages. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 00:08, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Speedy keep Thanks for the heads up. There were two difficulties leading to the non-use of the template. First, an editor had discovered that there was a technical problem with the way the template citation linked with sfn inline tags. Instead of fixing that technical problem, the editor deleted the template from the article and substituted a custom made citation. Secondly, various articles have had a custom citation added by other editors in apparent ignorance of the citation template. Both of these difficulties of course defeated the very purpose of the citation template, which is to ensure that a frequently cited book is properly cited uniformly throughout the encyclopedia. I have now fixed the technical problem (which required only the removal of one of the template citation's parameters) and have been adding the template to the pages where it should have been used but wasn't. That should lead to a keeping of the template, which is now on multiple articles as intended. Bahnfrend ( talk) 06:56, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply
    "Speedy keep" a first comment is very meaningless. Gonnym ( talk) 08:17, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Keep per Bahnfrend's explanation, and the high level of utility of the book in the history of rail transport in western australia. JarrahTree 07:58, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Keep, now that it is transcluded in a dozen articles. I have fixed the false-positive sfn errors. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 15:14, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Comment This can be closed now since the formatting has been fixed and is now used on the same articles I pointed out in the nomination. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 15:50, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Second French intervention in Mexico infobox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:42, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

An infobox for this conflict already exists on Second French intervention in Mexico as part of the article. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 00:04, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply

There is certainly no benefit in duplication. The sole issue is whether the infobox, which is very large, is better hosted as a separate template or as a part of an already big article. — Brigade Piron ( talk) 07:23, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply
Delete as infoboxes should be used directly inside the article. The only reason an infobox like this looks big is because the usage of references inside the infobox contrary to MOS:INFOBOXREF. Gonnym ( talk) 08:22, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply
Is the statement that "infoboxes should be used directly inside the article" an actual policy, or a statement of preference? Even without references, it would be pretty big. — Brigade Piron ( talk) 16:47, 18 April 2022 (UTC) reply
Infoboxes are big, tables are big, prose sections are big. Should we start moving everything to stand-alone templates now? Gonnym ( talk) 09:09, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook