September 30
templated text used across ship articles
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 07:01, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- Template:Attacker class aircraft facilities ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Attacker class armament ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Attacker class beam ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Attacker class capacity ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Attacker class displacement ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
No longer needed as substituted with the actual text in the last few articles that used them. There are further examples of this type of template in Category:Attacker class escort carrier infobox templates GraemeLeggett ( talk) 18:37, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete all per nomination. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 00:10, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Rover class tanker displacement
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 07:01, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused template originally used to put a value in a series of shipinfoboxes. GraemeLeggett ( talk) 18:12, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 00:07, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Missouri Democratic primary, 2008
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:33, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- Template:Missouri Democratic primary, 2008 ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Missouri Republican primary, 2008 ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Two templates which display results of each county's respective results in both party's primary election in the state of Missouri which is already featured on the 2008 Missouri Democratic presidential primary and 2008 Missouri Republican presidential primary. For counties in each state, the only information in table format that is notable enough to display is presidential election results, not party primaries. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 21:29, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno ( talk) 22:19, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 03:40, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep because all the uses I checked contained information that isn't present in the article prose. If you feel that presidential primary results are not notable enough to be included in articles (bearing in mind that Notability guidelines do not apply to article content) it would be better in my view to get consensus to remove them, then update the related articles, rather than backdoor deletion by removing the templates that contain the information. 192.76.8.74 ( talk) 04:26, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- I'm seeking consensus through this Tfd. Templates like these shouldn't be used. Because if this should be kept, then we should have both parties country primary results for all fifty states in each of their respective counties. And the information can easily be found in the 2008 Missouri primary articles which already has this information. Hard to believe anyone would be able to find this information just by browsing articles of Missouri counties. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 14:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- delete, all the information is now in the Democratic presidential primary county by county results and the Republican presidential primary county by county results. Frietjes ( talk) 15:19, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
September 30
templated text used across ship articles
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 07:01, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- Template:Attacker class aircraft facilities ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Attacker class armament ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Attacker class beam ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Attacker class capacity ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Attacker class displacement ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
No longer needed as substituted with the actual text in the last few articles that used them. There are further examples of this type of template in Category:Attacker class escort carrier infobox templates GraemeLeggett ( talk) 18:37, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete all per nomination. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 00:10, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Rover class tanker displacement
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 07:01, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused template originally used to put a value in a series of shipinfoboxes. GraemeLeggett ( talk) 18:12, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 00:07, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Missouri Democratic primary, 2008
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:33, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- Template:Missouri Democratic primary, 2008 ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Missouri Republican primary, 2008 ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Two templates which display results of each county's respective results in both party's primary election in the state of Missouri which is already featured on the 2008 Missouri Democratic presidential primary and 2008 Missouri Republican presidential primary. For counties in each state, the only information in table format that is notable enough to display is presidential election results, not party primaries. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 21:29, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno ( talk) 22:19, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 03:40, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep because all the uses I checked contained information that isn't present in the article prose. If you feel that presidential primary results are not notable enough to be included in articles (bearing in mind that Notability guidelines do not apply to article content) it would be better in my view to get consensus to remove them, then update the related articles, rather than backdoor deletion by removing the templates that contain the information. 192.76.8.74 ( talk) 04:26, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- I'm seeking consensus through this Tfd. Templates like these shouldn't be used. Because if this should be kept, then we should have both parties country primary results for all fifty states in each of their respective counties. And the information can easily be found in the 2008 Missouri primary articles which already has this information. Hard to believe anyone would be able to find this information just by browsing articles of Missouri counties. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 14:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- delete, all the information is now in the Democratic presidential primary county by county results and the Republican presidential primary county by county results. Frietjes ( talk) 15:19, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).