The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 03:30, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Please see WT:SPI/C#Is Template:SPI empty report in use?; no one on the clerk team can quite figure out what this was for, or why it has a nontrivial history despite having no transclusions and not being the kind of template you'd subst, but everyone seems to agree it's no longer in use, if it ever was. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she/they) 17:05, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 03:28, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Template links to only two articles; does not meet guidelines at MOS:FILM#Navigation. DoubleCross ( ‡) 14:12, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 03:33, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Single-use template which is not a sidebar. Even further, this is the kind of template that should already be described as the lead in an article. Izno ( talk) 03:26, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 03:26, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
This navigation template is used only on the article for organic fish itself. None of the other articles in the template discuss organic fish, or even mention the term. Epipelagic ( talk) 00:24, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 03:30, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Please see WT:SPI/C#Is Template:SPI empty report in use?; no one on the clerk team can quite figure out what this was for, or why it has a nontrivial history despite having no transclusions and not being the kind of template you'd subst, but everyone seems to agree it's no longer in use, if it ever was. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she/they) 17:05, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 03:28, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Template links to only two articles; does not meet guidelines at MOS:FILM#Navigation. DoubleCross ( ‡) 14:12, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 03:33, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Single-use template which is not a sidebar. Even further, this is the kind of template that should already be described as the lead in an article. Izno ( talk) 03:26, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 03:26, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
This navigation template is used only on the article for organic fish itself. None of the other articles in the template discuss organic fish, or even mention the term. Epipelagic ( talk) 00:24, 22 September 2021 (UTC)