From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 22

Template:User SPI Clerk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 03:30, 30 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Please see WT:SPI/C#Is Template:SPI empty report in use?; no one on the clerk team can quite figure out what this was for, or why it has a nontrivial history despite having no transclusions and not being the kind of template you'd subst, but everyone seems to agree it's no longer in use, if it ever was. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she/they) 17:05, 22 September 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Miss Congeniality

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 03:28, 30 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Template links to only two articles; does not meet guidelines at MOS:FILM#Navigation. DoubleCross ( ) 14:12, 22 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Delete per nom. -- Engineerchange ( talk) 14:47, 22 September 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Swedish nuclear weapons program timeline

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 03:33, 30 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Single-use template which is not a sidebar. Even further, this is the kind of template that should already be described as the lead in an article. Izno ( talk) 03:26, 22 September 2021 (UTC) reply

  • Delete Subst onto the article. No need for it to be on it's own template space. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 15:06, 22 September 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Organic fish

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 03:26, 30 September 2021 (UTC) reply

This navigation template is used only on the article for organic fish itself. None of the other articles in the template discuss organic fish, or even mention the term. Epipelagic ( talk) 00:24, 22 September 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 22

Template:User SPI Clerk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 03:30, 30 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Please see WT:SPI/C#Is Template:SPI empty report in use?; no one on the clerk team can quite figure out what this was for, or why it has a nontrivial history despite having no transclusions and not being the kind of template you'd subst, but everyone seems to agree it's no longer in use, if it ever was. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she/they) 17:05, 22 September 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Miss Congeniality

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 03:28, 30 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Template links to only two articles; does not meet guidelines at MOS:FILM#Navigation. DoubleCross ( ) 14:12, 22 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Delete per nom. -- Engineerchange ( talk) 14:47, 22 September 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Swedish nuclear weapons program timeline

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 03:33, 30 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Single-use template which is not a sidebar. Even further, this is the kind of template that should already be described as the lead in an article. Izno ( talk) 03:26, 22 September 2021 (UTC) reply

  • Delete Subst onto the article. No need for it to be on it's own template space. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 15:06, 22 September 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Organic fish

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 03:26, 30 September 2021 (UTC) reply

This navigation template is used only on the article for organic fish itself. None of the other articles in the template discuss organic fish, or even mention the term. Epipelagic ( talk) 00:24, 22 September 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook